Monday,
March 24, 2003
|
|
Feature |
|
Mass awakening needed
to curb Net porn
Vasantha Arora
INTERNET
pornography has become a big business in the USA with computer users
spending nearly $3 billion annually to see porn on increasingly explicit
Websites, according to a new survey.
New-York based research
firm, Datamonitor, says porn Website owners, in a bid to lure more
customers, inundate the Internet with porn spam, which is often laced
with graphic sexual photographs, as a teaser to visit paid sex Websites.
Spam is sent randomly to millions of e-mail addresses in one go.
Porn Website owners got a
shot in the arm last week when a federal appeals court in Philadelphia
struck down a law aimed at shielding children from Internet porn. The
court affirmed earlier decisions that said even though porn offends many
persons; porn on the Web is free speech, protected by the First
Amendment to the US Constitution.
Emboldened by this,
pornographers began flooding unsolicited porn advertisements to many
Internet mailboxes, including some easily accessed by children.
A California-based
columnist for PC computer magazine, John Dvorak, estimates that he gets
500 e-mails a day, with as many as 100 that he never asked for, touting
porn sites.
He says moderately
effective filters are available to block porn spam from one’s
electronic mailbox. Some of the filters recognise that the return e-mail
address is fictitious or impossible to trace and prevent the
pornographic message from reaching onemail inbox.
But then defining what
constitutes porn is tricky. Porn site owners have eased the term
"adult material" into the lexicon, making even hard-core
sexual content seem like harmless entertainment for grown-ups, media
reports here said.
Gail Dines, who is the
director of American studies programme at Wheelock College in Boston,
has written a chapter about Internet porn in a new feminist anthology
called Sisterhood is Forever.
She notes that
pornographers pioneered much of the Internet’s sophisticated
technology by introducing such features as video streaming and pop-up
ads.
According to her, the
effect of porn, first honed by ever-more-provocative sex magazines,
beginning with the soft porn of Playboy magazine in 1953, is that even
young boys are accepting the degradation of women as the norm. In other
words, boys are seeing themselves as entitled to use females any way
they want.
The only real hope at the
moment, Dines says, is that as more and more people are agitated by the
waves of porn on their Internet screens, porn will again be viewed as
harmful, rather than as a victimless crime.
Many companies have fired
employees for accepting porn messages at their computer workstations,
sometimes innocently.
Even though federal laws
aimed at Internet porn have been unsuccessful due to unfavourable court
decisions, several US states have taken steps on their own.
For instance, the
northwestern state of Utah offers a lengthy discussion of Internet porn
and porn spam on the Website of its State Attorney General Mark
Shurtleff. Last year, Utah passed a law aimed at prosecuting firms that,
without being asked, send Internet porn into Utah homes, where children
can view it.
Utah will soon offer its
citizens what it calls a "virtual 911 button", named after the
code that people use to call for help by telephone in an emergency.
This will enable Utah
residents to block further messages from undesirable Websites while at
the same time alerting the state attorney general. Utah hopes this new
technology will be an effective weapon against Internet pornographers.
|