The Tribune - Spectrum

ART & LITERATURE
'ART AND SOUL
BOOKS
MUSINGS
TIME OFF
YOUR OPTION
ENTERTAINMENT
BOLLYWOOD BHELPURI
TELEVISION
WIDE ANGLE
FITNESS
GARDEN LIFE
NATURE
SUGAR 'N' SPICE
CONSUMER ALERT
TRAVEL
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
CAPTION CONTEST
FEEDBACK

Sunday, January 19, 2003
Books

Vibrant account of great games superpowers played
Parshotam Mehra

Tournament of Shadows: the Great Game and the Race for Empire in Central Asia,
by Karl E Meyer & Shareen Blair Brysac, Counterpoint, WashingtonDC, 1999, Paperback, pp. xxv + 646.

FROM the last quarter of the 18th century to the opening decade of the 2Oth, the Tsarist empire was steadily, if surely, expanding towards the south, embracing large swathes of then relatively empty, if predominantly Muslim, territory.

Even as it did so, it had a head-on collision with Pax Britannica which, through Persia and Afghanistan, was expanding its sphere of influence—if not territorial dominion. Its objective: to protect the crown's brightest jewel, the fledgling Indian empire. As the Russian steamroller, all through the latter half of the 19th century, ploughed through the khanates of Khiva,

Bokhara and Samarkand, the British, to stem the tide, buttressed the regimes of the Safavis in Persia and the Durranis in Afghanistan so as to slow down if not halt its relentless advance. There were few head-on collisions for most, it was shadowboxing; cold war waged with the no less deadly weapons of intrigue, espionage, and one-upmanship. A major player in the game, Count Nesselrode, for long foreign minister to Tsar Nicholas I (1825-55), referred to it, not inaptly, as a tournament of shadows.

 


And that is what it was: A large, if impressive, tome running into almost 700 pages of print, the book apart from a brief prologue, The view from the Khyber, and an impressive epilogue, The Owl of Minerva, has been divided into three, near-equal, parts. The first starting with William Moorcrofi, the "horse-doctor", ploughs through the sorry, if sordid, tale of the First Afghan War (1838-42) and ends with, the "Bulgarian atrocities" and the Treaty of San Stefano ( 1878) when a victorious Russia imposed its peace on a rickety , badly worsted, Ottoman Empire.

The second part begins with "Bloornsbury's War" the Second Afghan War (1878-81) and ends with the epoch-making British and Russian "finds" in the heart of Central Asia:

Aurel Stein's amazing discovery of Dunhuang juxtaposed with the redoubtable Pyotir Kozlov's KharaKhoto, the fabled "Black City" of the Tanguts.

Part three occupies itself largely with Tibet. And Curzon's determined pitch to force it open. The result, Francis Younghusband's armed expedition to holy Lhasa (1903-4), rated as the "most pointless" of British India's imperial adventures, and the Dalai Lama's flight from his land and his people. He was soon caught, even as Tibet was, in the vortex of the October (1911) revolution in China and its most destabilising aftermath.

With the Manchus overthrown and a moribund republican regime in the saddle in Nanking, the Lama was almost free to run his country's affairs, especially after the British and the Russians concluded a hands off truce (1907) bringing the Great Game to an eventful end.

Not that it sounded the finale. For the "Tournament" dwells on the exploits of the American twosome, Suydam Cutting and Arthur Varnay who repaired to Lhasa (1935) and came into close contact with the post-13th Dalai Lama regime. There is also the fascinating tale of the Bavarian German explorer Dr Ernst Schafer who, trained a zoologist at Gottingen, ended up (1939) as an SS agent carrying an apso dog as a present from the Tibetan regent to Adolf Hitler, "the King of Germany". And the oft-repeated escapade in the early 1940s of the Americans Brooke Dolan and Ilia Tolstoy who, part of the US Strategic Command, had, for the first time, brought Tibet into official contact with Washington.

An epilogue carries the "Tournament" fast forward beyond both Halford Mackinder with his "heartland" view of Eurasia as the geographical pivot of history and Beijing's 1962 incursion into Indian territory when the "gullible and weak" Nehru allegedly "succumbed" to the imperial theses about geography and distant frontiers. As the "Owl of Minerva" goes on the prowl there is more to its embrace including the late Harry Hodson' s well-reasoned view that the Great Game "really was a Game with scores but no substantive prizes". Not that the last word has yet been said. For principled assurances to the contrary notwithstanding, Central Asia again bids fair to become the setting for the next Great Game- between Russia, the USA and China as they compete for access to the, vast oil reserves of the region. A husband and wife team, Karl Meyer is a foreign correspondent of the New York Times editorial board and currently editor of the World Policy Journal. Shareen Brysac is an author and editor of the Archaeology magazine. Between the two they have made the book a rich, rewarding, fare. To say that it has a nice turn of phrase and is racy is not saying much; the "Tournament" is well researched and a treasure-trove for any meaningful understanding of all that the Great Game was about.

Two minor irritants. One, easily understandable, an overblown view of US involvement.

Thus WW Rockhill the "Open Door Diplomat"- Suydam Cutting and Brooke Dolan loom larger than life. Two, with footnotes relegated to the end, the flow of the narrative goes unimpeded and yet there is, for the inquisitive reader, an unending turning of pages up and down. This though is churlish, petty nit-picking. For one hates to detract from the merits of an outstanding work.