Thursday,
December 19, 2002, Chandigarh, India |
|
MDU holds camp on assessing students Rohtak, December 18 Further an acupressure camp, a free workshop on acupressure as well as a paid acupressure basic training programme are also being organised at the university health centre. These started today and will be on till December 20. Meanwhile, consequent upon his appointment as Dean, Faculty of Commerce, Dr S. N. Mittal, will be a member of the Executive Council and the Finance Committee of the university under Statute-II and Statute-15 of the MDU Act with effect from December 19, 2002 to July 19, 2003. |
HC: DFS must inspect all high-rises by March 31 New Delhi, December 18 A Bench comprising Justice Anil Dev Singh and Justice R. S. Sodhi said a status report in this regard must be placed before the court on April 14. The court expressed dissatisfaction over slow progress in inspecting the 1,200 high-rise buildings in the Capital for fire safety measures ordered by it. The court noted that at the present rate, the work might take more than a year to complete. Concerned over the lack of fire safety measures in most of the 1,200 high-rises in the city, the court on October 25 directed the DFS chief to launch an inspection drive to find out violation of laws by the building owners and the tenants. After examining a sample status report of ten buildings today, as sought by the court during last hearing, it said that severe action would be taken against owners, users and tenants for any violation of building bye-laws and not taking steps to adopt the fire safety norms. Mr Sharma told the court that of the 59 buildings examined by the DFS so far, 39 were found to be violating the rules. The court also directed the Delhi Jal Board, New Delhi Municipal Council and the Delhi Cantonment Board to keep up-to-date all the 214 static water tanks in their respective areas to ensure water supply to the fire brigade in any emergency. The court further said the DJB and the civic authorities would maintain properly the fire hydrants in their jurisdiction. The court also directed the DDA to clear the land use plan for DFS’ workshop at Geeta Colony as the organisation was not being able to meet requirements for repairing equipment. The directions were issued by the court during the hearing of a Public Interest Litigation highlighting lack of fire safety measures in high-rise buildings and the alleged improper maintenance of fire fighting equipment by the DFS. The DFS had earlier stated that all the buildings of over 15-metre height fell within the category of high-rise structures.
|
Govt plea against bail to Bar members rejected Rohtak, December 18 They were allowed bail by the court on September 9 on their furnishing personal bonds to the tune of Rs 15,000 each with one surety each in the like amount and they were also directed to join investigations as and when called by the investigating officer by a written notice served at least two days in advance. Now the State of Haryana had sought cancellation of the bail on the ground that the bail was obtained by suppression of facts. Two members of the Bar are the accused in this litigation whereas the complainant is a very senior officer of the prosecution department of Haryana. The complainant had made an application to the Women Cell for appropriate action and the above-mentioned FIR was registered two days after. In the meantime, the accused got a case registered against the son and daughters of the complainant. The said FIR lodged by the accused was challenged before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, where Mr Gurbachan Singh, DSP (Headquarters) had filed a reply to the effect that cancellation of the said FIR against the son and daughters of the complainant had been recommended by the department. The accused, who became petitioners in the second FIR, are contending that the complainant has misused his official position to get the FIR registered against them by getting back-dated entries made in the record of the Women Cell and that in fact the FIR was got registered by the complainant only after their FIR had been registered against his son and daughters for assaulting the petitioners. It is also alleged that the complainant has similarly got cancellation of the FIR against his son and daughters recommended and has got this application moved for cancellation of their bail. “I refrain myself from harping on these aspects as investigation of this case is in progress and the FIR lodged by the accused has not been finally cancelled so far,” the Additional Sessions Judge said. “In the totality of the circumstances, in my considered opinion, it is not a fit case for cancelling the already granted bail in view of the law laid down by the apex court time and again. As such, I reject the application for cancellation of bail made by the prosecution,” Mr Shiva Sharma said. |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 122 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |