|
There is little doubt that the Army while fighting a proxy war
in J&K, insurgency in the North-East, a continuous fire
along the LoC and Siachen, and internal security operations in
one state or the other, has its hands full the year round. So
where is the time to send infantry personnel from field areas to
peace areas after every two years, to execute essential training
cycles, and for generals and commanders to put their heads
together to do some strategic thinking. This serious situation
is further aggravated when the para-military forces of the
country (under the Home Ministry) are unable to be as supportive
of the Army as they are expected to be in the operational mode,
be it in the Kashmir valley or on the border. And as the Army
struggles to catch up with its multifarious tasks, the financial
crunch, so often stressed by the Finance Ministry, has often put
the blocks on the Army’s modernisation programmes, and
regretfully even barely met its daily maintenance requirements.
The former Chief has written about all these pitfalls in the
Army, but unfortunately has been unable to suggest any remedial
measures, which at least this reviewer and many others who have
also donned the uniform, would have expected him to do.
The only
important, and primary, role of the Army is the defence of its
international borders, and not to aid the civil authority. Gen
Roychowdhury like the Chiefs before and after him, has failed to
even get the primacy of the primary role of the Indian Army
established in the civilian hierarchy and government, on the
ground and in practice, where it matters the most to the jawan
in the field.
Roychowdhury has
covered the siege of Chrar-e-Sharif in some detail, but calling
the chapter Blue Star over Chrar-e-Sharif is not in good taste,
especially when the effort should be heal the wounds that this
operation in the Golden Temple inflicted on the psyche of the
Sikhs. He has highlighted and praised the role of the Rashtriya
Rifles in the Valley, though many in the RR itself and also this
reviewer feel that the formation of this force (composed by
milking the regular Army itself, with the government not
agreeing to any force increments), was never necessary, and
being officered and manned by the Army needs to be amalgamated
within its parent fold. This will aid in better command and
control, and prevent too many power centres from coming up.
Roychowdhury touches on the nuclear question in the region and
the NBC environment, and I dare say, that we need to definitely
pull up our socks in being able to effectively meet a ‘first
strike’ of chemical and nuclear weaponry. I feel that we need
to be better prepared.
One wishes that
the General had suggested suitable remedies and incentives, like
recruitment being based on merit, and not on the RMP (Recruitable
Male Population) of a particular state, as is the case today,
when he talks about the poor intake into the Services at the
present times. Talking about the efforts of many highly placed
officers to enlist the help of the Press to further their own
interests, the General writes, "But as many amongst them
have ruefully found out, the media is utterly and totally
amoral. They will accept your whiskey and cut your throat as
part of the same transaction."
Gen Roychowdhury
is the first Army Chief to have written about the actual state
of the Indian Army. He has not soft-pedaled any issue, including
the non-cooperation of the Northern Command during his time, or
the sorry state of the Indian armour fleet of the Vijayanta
tanks, or about the shortage of essential equipment in the Army,
and its ill effect during the Kargil war. The moot question is
why he did not resign when he found out that he could not
achieve what he had set out to?
|