|
Speaking generally, the National Movement in India is studied in
India as Nationalism versus British Imperialism, but the
constitutional aspects of self-government are neglected.
Reginald Coupland figures nowhere but some references are made
to R.J. Moore’s researches.
In view of a
general apathy to the constitutional history of India and to
Cripps, a recently published book, The Cripps Version: The
Life of Sir Stafford Cripps (1889-1952) by Peter Clarke
(Allen Lane: The Penguin Press, 2002, £ 20, pages XVIII + 534)
is welcome. Peter Clarke is Professor of British History and
Master of Trinity Hall, Cambridge. He has made a substantial
contribution to British history and politics in the 20th
century. Clarke’s aim is to rescue Cripps from oblivion by
writing on him a three-dimensional biography.
The biography
covers the most crucial part of British history of the 20th
century through the study of this political figure. In tune with
the British historiographical tradition of relating a
personality to his milieu, he explores the social and political
developments of the time. Yet there are limits to a biographical
perspective. His focus on the biographical life of Cripps limits
the scope of his study. Historical events are studied in the
context of Cripps’ personality, and therefore certain
questions inevitably remain unanswered. In short, biographical
study is a limited study of human situation. Clarke’s book
testifies to this limit.
Broadly speaking,
the book is divided into five parts: Cripps’ early life, his
Ambassadorship to Russia, his two Missions to India, his role as
Chancellor of the Exchequer, and finally a moving account of his
illness and death. Clarke has used an enormous range of source
material in the reconstruction of Cripps’ life. He had an
unrestricted access to the Cripps’ private collection of
papers, especially his Diary of 1946, hitherto unused, which
throws light on the Cabinet Mission to India. I have always felt
that Diaries, unless written for posterity with a design, are
more reliable than autobiographies. Regrettably, Clarke has not
used Nehru’s journal of his prison days (1942-45), which
reveals Nehru’s disappointments with Gandhi on his leadership
from 1939-42.
Clarke has drawn a
somewhat frightening portrait of Cripps, who emerges from this
study a man of luminous intellect, stiff-necked, self-righteous,
self-opinionated, a vegetarian, non-alcoholic, non-smoker,
reading law books, incapable of forming enduring friendship,
writing letters to his wife on politics, looking up to Jesus as
his hero, and Marx as his guardian, without seeing any
incompatibility between the two. Taciturn and reserved, he knew
not how to relax. A self-mortifying individual who made
austerity a religious cult, he was regarded in the Press as the
"English Gandhi". Churchill quipped, "He (Cripps)
has all the virtues that I dislike, and none of the vices that I
admire." However, when Cripps died, Churchill paid a most
memorable tribute by calling him the "Soul of Honour."
The most
fascinating chapter in the book is "Cripps and
Churchill." In the section dealing with Cripps’ proposals
Clarke has used with care Coupland’s Diary, which gives an
account of Cripps’ negotiations with Gandhi, Jinnah, Nehru and
Azad. Clarke has dispelled the view that Churchill scuttled his
proposals. He shows that Churchill’s telegrams of April 10
reached Cripps when the Congress Working Committee had already
rejected his proposals. As a candid historian, Clarke suggests a
number of explanations for the failure of proposals.
I believe the
crucial factor of Cripps’ failure was Gandhi’s commitment to
non-violence and his determination to keep India out of war. For
this a close study of the proceedings of the Congress Working
Committee (1939-42) is needed. On the issue of non-violence,
Rajaji, K.M. Munshi, M.N. Roy and Bhulabhai Desai were made to
quit the Congress. Maulana Azad resigned on the same issue. And
just a month before the Quit India Movement, Gandhi asked Nehru
to resign due to his differences on India’s participation in
the war effort despite the fact that he had nominated Nehru as
his successor a few days earlier. To Gandhi non-violence was
more important than independence. In his journal Nehru wrote,
while in prison, that on the issues relating to war "Bapu
turned the wrong way" and there was "a marked
deterioration in the great man," though "greatness
still remains" but "the old sagacity is gone. The
so-called Gandhian era is over," he added.
Clarke looks to
the Indian situation through the eyes of Cripps, who relies on
the advice of Gandhi and Nehru. Like Cripps, Nehru had no
political base in the party. Gandhi, assisted by Patel, was the
controlling authority. In 1946 Cripps and Pethic-Lawrence partly
succeeded because they picked up Patel. I fear that Clarke has
not given due treatment to Patel’s role. Patel stood up to
Gandhi and had his own way to settle constitutional problems. In
1946-1947 Patel was the guiding star, though, of course, Nehru
too joined him. Gandhi had not nominated Patel as his successor
because of his physical stamina—he was suffering from cancer.
Cripps had a profound influence on the political destiny of
India from 1942 onwards until Mountbatten took over as the
Viceroy. The Mountbatten Plan was a reproduction of the Cripps
proposals with suitable variations.
Though Cripps
brought ethical values to politics he did not understand the
rocky nature of the material world. Clarke is absolutely right
in saying that he lacked political adroitness. Cripps’ liberal
voice stands out amidst the more strident assertions of British
imperialists. Yet Clarke’s book confirms that ultimately
voices such as those of Cripps were not effective enough to
bring reconciliation within the fractured Indian polity in the
1940s. No historical figure in fact could alter the turn of the
historical forces.
This book is
essential reading for any serious student of Modern Indian
History. Using first-class hitherto unpublished material, Clarke
has presented a vivid and sensitive portrait of Cripps. This
shows his profound scholarship and wide sweep, in exquisite
prose written with verve and effortless ease.
|