The Tribune - Spectrum
ART & LITERATURE
'ART AND SOUL
BOOKS
MUSINGS
TIME OFF
YOUR OPTION
ENTERTAINMENT
BOLLYWOOD BHELPURI
TELEVISION
WIDE ANGLE
FITNESS
GARDEN LIFE
NATURE
SUGAR 'N' SPICE
CONSUMER ALERT
TRAVEL
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
CAPTION CONTEST
FEEDBACK

Sunday, November 24, 2002

Bridge

An unscientific way to bid a hand

THIS spectacular hand was played on the worldwide computer system, OKBridge. South blasted into 6C on the second round. It was an unscientific way to bid the hand (not that science always pays when you have a freak distribution). South might have bid 4C at his second turn, or perhaps a fourth-suit-forcing 2S, to be followed by a further bid in clubs. Would you expect the slam to be made? West led the ace of spades, his partner playing the 4. He then switched to the ace of hearts. Declarer ruffed, drew trumps, and claimed the contract. The result sheet showed that three Souths had made 7C on the ace of hearts lead, two of them having been doubled. Six Souths had made 6C, one of them doubled. Only two Souths had gone down in 6C. Playing in the ‘correct’ contract of 5C, twelve Souths had made 13 tricks, four had made 12 tricks, and only two had been held to 11 tricks. There was one other score: 7NT doubled and 500 down! I don’t really blame the West players for letting through a slam. The standard of play on OKBridge is high and the result sheet showed how difficult this defensive problem was.

— David Bird

Home Top