Sunday,
November 17, 2002 |
|
Books |
|
|
Underlining the importance of nuclear policy to national security
V. P. Malik
Nuclear Weapons
and Indian Security
by Bharat Karnad. Macmillan India Limited, 2002.
Pages 724. Rs 795.
BHARAT
Karnad’s Nuclear Weapons and Indian Security is about the
‘role that nuclear weapons have played from the very beginning in
influencing Indian foreign and military policies, the evolution of
Indian strategic thought, the country’s international posture and,
especially, its national security outlook in the context of the
larger and more diffuse cultural milieu, in which ancient wisdom
prescribing the use of weapons of mass destruction coexists with
modern concepts of total war’. It is essentially an inquiry into
how and why India zigzagged its way into a position of nuclear
reckoning but, time and again, fell short and continues to fall
short.
The book advocates a
maximalist, proactive approach for Indian security. While such a
thought and approach is appreciated and generally supported; his
research and analysis of India’s ‘realist foundations of
strategy’ tends to betray his (lack of) ‘realistic’
understanding of India’s politico-military decision-making
character.
According to Karnad,
the USA’s imperial yearnings and its tendency to threaten
manifestly unequal adversaries with the use of advanced nuclear and
conventional military weapons or other non-military coercive means,
has created a feeling of insecurity in the world. The attempt at
imposing American solutions at the global level has affected the
rest of the world, especially Russia, India and China. India and
China require re-aligning their strategic plans and policies vis
a vis the sole superpower during the current arms control
winter. In such a strategic environment, the importance of nuclear
weapons as the ultimate safeguard of sovereignty and enforcer of
peace (on one’s own terms) has been significantly enhanced.
Karnad rightly
expresses his concern over ethnic and communal tensions in India
that may invite international intervention in the form of economic
and political pressure, and at a later stage, even at a military
level. While I agree that that due to a changed strategic
environment and nature of conflict, there is a need to review many
of our military combat organisations, I cannot endorse the solution
that Karnad advocates, which requires the formation of commando
units or special forces ‘to tackle sub limited wars, putting a
stop to Islamabad brandishing the atomic bomb, mounting counter
guerrilla campaign, operating deep in the enemy’s rear and
generally to prosecuting all actions requiring stealth’. This
shows ignorance of the existing, though inadequate, military
organisations like the Para Commandos and the Rashtriya Rifles, as
well as the Geneva Convention and International Laws of War. In
fact, one of our problems is that we have too many of such special
forces which do not have proper training, equipment and legal
authority under the Ministries of Home, Defence, Cabinet
Secretariat, and also at the state level.
Karnad rightly
emphasises that the anti-terrorist military capability should not be
achieved at the expense of nuclear weapons. He believes that India
faces a latent threat from the USA on account of the Indian
deterrent. The Indian deterrent will not only reduce the possibility
of such a threat actually materialising into real action but also
neutralise China’s centrality to Asian politics by exerting
counter-pressure.
A strong votary of a
great-power status on the basis of military power, Karnad has plenty
to say about the lack of strategic mindset in the post-Nehru
political leadership. He feels that the enervation of the Indian
spirit, the weakness in national resolve and the haziness of vision
are reflected mainly in India’s nuclear weapons policy and plans.
He believes that India’s nuclear weapons strength will reinforce
the territoriality of the state and also widen the range of economic
capabilities. It will open the doors to the great-power club.
The biggest plus point
of the book is that it exposes the lack of strategic thinking and
weakness in our politico-military decision-making. At a time when
most of our strategic thinkers and authors tend to follow western
advice and writings, or only justify government decisions, Karnad’s
book stands out for recommending proactive Indian strategic thought.
On the minus side, the
economic, technological and safety factors required to maintain such
a large inventory of strategic weapons and missiles have not been
adequately calculated and factored in this otherwise very
comprehensive study. There is also the evidence of the author’s
lack of knowledge and experience of Indian governance.
Karnad’s immense
research for the book is evident from its 723 references and 16
pages of index. But it also includes some ‘personal communications’
wherein names of people quoted have been held back and the given
facts or statements have not been cross-checked with others.
An informative,
stimulating and provocative book that makes a very useful
contribution to India’s strategic thought and policies,
particularly in the field of nuclear and other strategic weapon
systems. A must-read for those interested in India’s national
security.
|