|
The essay "Qutub and modern memory" gives a scholarly
insight into the Qutub Minar and the nearby mosque, now in
ruins, which has transcended time but producing devastating
results. The transition of the place Masjid-i-Jami from being
Qubbat al-Islam (sanctuary of Islam) to Quawwat al-Islam (the
might of Islam) is educative, though so much has changed that
his scholarly attempt is likely to remain an intellectual
exercise for bookworms. Moreover, despite his being able to
convince the academic minded about the competitive nature of the
early representatives of Islam in India in destroying Hindu
temples, the fact remains that Islam does have to answer for
destroying the existing civilisations, heritage and symbols
wherever it went. This is an accusation hurled by not only the
likes of Sir Vidya Naipaul but also by the collective
consciousness of those who escaped annihilation as seen in much
of Islamic lands. Therefore, among Hindus there is always a
small nook for resentment, historians like Sunil Kumar
notwithstanding. The essay on Hauz Rani is both interesting and
poignant and is perhaps an apt commentary on man’s attempt to
attain immortality and the irony of the fate that awaits such
efforts. In the case of Hauz Rani not only the facts of history
have changed to suit the living but modern urban planning,
manned by ignorant and prejudiced minds, has contrived to make a
parody of the meaning and context of secularism. The essay on
the past of Saidaljab village belongs to the same genre, though
here he explores the human consciousness which finds it
"extremely disconcerting to accept that our religious
faith, or things which we regard as sacred and holy, had only an
immediate history." This explains how and why the
"facts" of history keep changing along with the
demography of the place. This, while creating a huge distance
between Sayyid al-Hujjab and the village of Saidaljab has also
"erased the complex history of movement and resettlement of
people over centuries in a small village in Delhi."
However, it must
be said that the book can make a reader rethink even if it is no
simple task to iron out the creases in the long and complex
history of Delhi. It is worth the effort since, as the author
says, "The Qutub stands as an icon, encapsulating the
trauma of 1947 and acting as a historical exoneration for the
acts of December 1992." This is all the more important
since a number of historians of medieval India have been
providing "proof" and "evidence" in
justification of the transition of a place of congregation and
piety as a symbol of power, thus simplifying the multi-layered
history of the mosque and its adjacent minar.
|