In the Information Era the production forces have received an
unimaginable quantum jump, producing heaps of wealth that is
more evenly distributed among individuals engaged in the
production process. Therefore, modern information-based
capitalism, according to Pritam Singh, is more socialistic than
the oligarchic socialism of the Soviet brand. Such arguments
have been put forth by the author to debunk all kinds of
progressive strains.
No doubt, Pritam
Singh gives a good expose of modernism and problems of the
progressive movement in literature, but his ideas about
cybernetic capitalism and its global fallout are not tenable
when we consider the neo-colonial ravages caused by the
present-day market forces.
The second half of
the 20th century is known by the rivalry of two superpowers. But
the advent of the 21st century has spawned two blocs of a
different kind — the powerful and the powerless. The
Information Revolution has caused huge concentration of wealth
in a dozen or so countries of the world. Pritam Singh himself
maintains that one single individual Bill Gates of the Microsoft
owns billions of dollars, which is more than the GDP of many
nations in the Third World. In fact, now the working class is
not the proletariat of the world, it is the scores and scores of
pauperised nations.
Pritam Singh’s
assumption that Marxism has become irrelevant since it has
failed to remove poverty is based on a facile understanding of
Marxist ideas. Poverty has never been a point of departure for
Karl Marx. Since he was basically a philosopher in the Hegelian
tradition, his inquiry starts with dehumanisation of man in the
capitalist system. He maintains that people have remained poor
in all preceding ages, but they were never as dehumanised and
alienated as they are in the present system. Not only the
workers are dehumanised because of poverty, the capitalist is
also dehumanised because of the brute behaviour of capital,
which is usually devoid of any human attributes whatsoever.
The "species
essence" of man can be realised only in a just global
order. Information or capital, whatever generates wealth, unless
it is utilised for the well being of mankind, it is not a human
institution. Both information and capital in the present system
are behaving in a more brutal way than they ever did in the
past, thus lumpenising millions of people in the world.
Pritam Singh holds
that intellectual property today is the greatest source of
wealth, but one may ask in which direction does it flow and who
is getting rich at whose cost? I hope the author will take his
look off his fetish, that is, cybernetic heaps of wealth, and
review the plight of the "proletarianised" nations of
the world that now have landed in a blind alley waiting to be
rescued by the "frowning knights" of the world.
|