Although the data has been
scrupulously compiled and the 'rounded off' inferences served on
a platter, it seems too much has been inferred from the
archaeological evidence available i.e. the grinding stones as
well as ceramic artifacts found in the area. The patterns of
provisioning and donating alone cannot make us confirm the
hypothesis that pilgrimage lead to increased social interactions
as well as greater demarcation of group identities at the same
time.
In fact, if 'part
of pilgrimage is the departure from equilibrium...as (it) often
involves temporary abandonment of domestic responsibilities as
well as arduous and sometimes expensive travel' (Malville and
Singh,1997), then the logical conclusion would be that the
pilgrims are essentially tourists at heart and are indulging in
typical tourist behaviour as there is a breakdown of social
boundaries whenever human beings are in transit en masse.
The best literary example being the 'pilgrims' in Chaucer's Canterbury
Tales who tell stories to each other and crack jokes, in
spite of belonging to different ends of the social continuum.
Again in India,
rarely have pilgrimages been 'vigorously opposed by powers whose
interests it would not serve'(Morinis 1992) as is evident from
the number of persons belonging to the minority communities who
are allowed to proceed towards their respective pilgrimage sites
even today (Sikh jathas to gurdwaras in Pakistan, a
traditionally hostile neighbour, and Muslims for haj to
Mecca).
Also in southern
India, where the society is rigidly defined along caste lines,
it is difficult to visualise pilgrims from different sub-castes
sharing the same common eating houses or preparing/partaking
meals together. Nor do the inscriptions, detailing the donations
made to different temples by persons of different sub-caste,
class or gender, validate the hypothesis. Even another
criterion, the use of common pathways in the city by pilgrims
promoting socialisation, is superficial. Even if the time spent
circumambulating, shopping or sight-seeing in the city comprises
a major part of the total time spent 'pilgrimaging', there is no
way to ascertain that this activity was also not confined to the
same sub-group, i.e. those belonging to the same sub-group
probably moved together for the above-mentioned purposes.
However, the
importance of the work lies primarily in bunching these varied
themes together and trying to interpret the remains of a
civilisation not only from the archaeological point of view, but
also taking into account the sociological perspective as well.
The examination of literary texts, ethnographic data and other
lines of evidence do add depth to the research.
Also illuminating
are the definitions which are gleaned from contemporary research
papers or journals, giving us insight into similar concepts
existing across other cultures. It is the belief of visualising
a relationship between people and stones that makes Mack's study
revealing and her methodology inviting enough to bear imitation.
|