The Tribune - Spectrum
ART & LITERATURE
'ART AND SOUL
BOOKS
MUSINGS
TIME OFF
YOUR OPTION
ENTERTAINMENT
BOLLYWOOD BHELPURI
TELEVISION
WIDE ANGLE
FITNESS
GARDEN LIFE
NATURE
SUGAR 'N' SPICE
CONSUMER ALERT
TRAVEL
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
CAPTION CONTEST
FEEDBACK

Sunday
, July 28, 2002
Article

Hollywood hues
Gripping yet predictable
Ervell E. Menezes

In Murder by Numbers, Sandra Bullock plays a seasoned private eye
In Murder by Numbers, Sandra Bullock plays a seasoned private eye

SANDRA Bullock seems to have graduated from the simple girl next door, afraid of getting romantically involved, to a seasoned private eye who teaches her new assistant Ben Chaplin a thing or two not only about the detective business, but takes the initiative in the game of love too. As Jessica Hudson, better known as Cassey (does she have something to hide?), she is confronted with an unusual problem in Murder by Numbers.

For one thing, Cassey is asked to appear before the California Parole Board for Carl Hudson, but is reluctant to do so. Is there something that is bothering her? Then there is a murder. A woman is mutilated and murdered, her body thrown in the bushes. The finger of suspicion points at a good many suspects, so naturally there are red-herrings galore and the director Barbett Schroeder shuttles between these suspects, a little romance and a good deal of lateral movement to build the ground for an exciting whodunit .

Enter Justin Pendleton (Ryan Gosling), a namby-pamby but studious young guy who is the butt of most of the jokes in his class. Richard Heywood ( Chris Penn ) assumes the role of his protector. That is probably the beginning of a bond that grows into a gay affair. What's more, their personalities seem to complement each other. Shades of the two key characters in In Cold Blood.

 


It is a complex relationship and detective Cassey with all her expertise seems to be a kind of novice in the case. But she is still ahead of her greenhorn partner Sam (Ben Chaplin). So she decides to woo him for a change. After all, with women's lib it is the women who often make the passes .

Meanwhile, the very academic Justin reads an essay on "Crime and freedom " and is ridiculed by his class. " I enjoy taking indefensible positions and arguing about it," he tells his protector Richard and the two of them are always having a heated argument .

"It wasn't about getting away from him, it is about standing up to him", is an important line in the script and it sums up the relationship between the two. In fact, it is the complex Justin who has to stand up to Richard. It is an engrossing whodunit but once again a wee bit too long, all of 120 minutes. Cinematographer Luciani Tavoli keeps the story moving on a number of fronts and Sandra Bullock has the ability to hold the viewer's attention.

Bullock may have come into the limelight in action flims like Speed, but she has surely grown from strength to strength as she has convincingly portrayed the everyday working girl, who has too much on her hands to fall in love.

But, may be to avoid getting typecast, she seems to be switching to the private eye persona.

If Bullock holds centrestage, it is Chris Penn, brother of Sean, who is next best. Maybe it is the character he plays that helps, but as a dominant male in a gay relationship he does an excellent job. Ben Chaplin is rather subdued as Bullock’s understudy, but the four key characters seem to share enough of the camera which only enhances the action.

Layer by layer, the onion is peeled and Sandra Bullock is mistress of all she surveys . Then, in keeping with the new trend of a heroine doing all that the hero did down the years, she has to get her act together to show that the female is not only intelligent but capable of retaliating when attacked. Apart from this sort of predictability, the film is absorbing most of the time.

In fact, it is one of better films in the new package of Hollywood potboilers, which are neither here nor there or are downright trite as they pretend to be funny.

Maybe I have a soft corner for Sandra Bullock but she's not the only reason for seeing the film. As a whodunit it stands on its own. It may not be a classic, but it surely is worth watching.

Home Top