Part IV examines the multiple
interphases between gender, diagnoses, and society in the
hospital psychiatric wards, then courts and the media.
The authors'
experience in the psychiatric wards and the cross examination of
the rape victims in the courts are appalling.
There is
epistemological movement in each part of the book. This movement
is the basis for the organisation of the chapters. The papers
are organised in terms of their sameness and/or difference
regarding scientific epistemologies. The locations range from
realist positions about the validity and objectivity of science
to critical anti-science, anti-realist, phenomenological,
hermeneutic or deconstructionist positions.
In order to
demystify some commonly held opinions, that scientific realism
may be upheld not only by the mental and behavioural scientists,
and therapists, but also feminists. Sriram and Mukherjee have
analysed the roots and reaches of marital violence and the
methods of treating them. Chakrobarty, Vijyalakshmi and Seshadri,
the mental health professionals, chose the phenomenological
approach to understand the human behaviour. There are a variety
of epistemological positions within feminism, the social
sciences and the behavioural sciences; and what divides beliefs
and opinions between the professionals and the feminists is not
always the type of epistemology espoused.
Hegde's paper
in the book is a critical self-reflection on this book itself -
about the possibilities and limitations of realist positions for
a philosophy of social science in general, and for the emergent
discourse on women and mental health in particular.
The collection
of essays in this book gives an idea of how the contributors
have negotiated their own disciplines in resolving their
epistemological tensions of science vs. culture, nature vs.
nature, truth vs. narrative, individuals vs. community, fact vs.
experience, man vs. woman, and so on in addressing the domain of
mental health and women.
Realist and
anti-realist epistemologies can have different implications for
therapy. These differences can further be accentuated by whether
the therapy is feminist or not. Realism about human behaviour
stresses the sameness of individuals over differences. The
universal aspect of being human is privileged over the
particular and is argued that over and beyond contextual
differences, there is something common to all individuals. These
common aspects may be biological, but equally, they may also be
behavioural, cognitive, psycho-social and so on.
The feminist
papers by Kalathil, Panjabi, Chawla, Pinto, and Ram describe the
therapeutic effectiveness of social behaviours of women who are
rooted within community life. The anti-realist, anti-science
feminist papers in this book see intervention in political
terms, and feminist resistance to oppression, whether open or
indirect, is argued to be an important intervention strategy
contributing to women's mental health.
The book explores perspectives
from clinical work and community practices and addresses themes
relating to both intervention and advocacy.
|