The Tribune - Spectrum
 
ART & LITERATURE
'ART AND SOUL
BOOKS
MUSINGS
TIME OFF
YOUR OPTION
ENTERTAINMENT
BOLLYWOOD BHELPURI
TELEVISION
WIDE ANGLE
FITNESS
GARDEN LIFE
NATURE
SUGAR 'N' SPICE
CONSUMER ALERT
TRAVEL
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
CAPTION CONTEST
FEEDBACK



Sunday
, May 12, 2002
Books

Reliving the of pangs of Partition
Review by Sandhya Chaudhri

Pangs of Partition, Vol. II, The Human Dimension, Edited by S. Settar & Indira Baptista Gupta, Indian Council of Historical Research, Manohar Publishers & Distributors, New Delhi, 2002, Pp 358, Rs. 700/-.

THE Volume II ‘Human Dimension’ can be called a people’s history as it takes us away from the history of the official records to the domain of tragedy where the drama of Partition was enacted with a pang in the heart. Based on experiences, recollections and reminiscences in the form of eye-witness accounts, testimonials and oral narrations, it listens to the marginal voices and focuses on popular culture of the period. It provides a microscopic view of the fallout of Partition.

The human dimension of the Partition of the Punjab and the Bengal is well represented in the 23 articles through various forms of literary representations such as stories, novels, plays, films etc which bring out the totality of the experiences often missed by historians.

The volume begins with description of Partition in school textbooks in India and Pakistan by Krishna Kumar. Writers of both the countries broadly share the state-sponsored ideological biases in representing the events which get imprinted on young minds. The most obvious difference is, however, that for textbooks in India, Partition is a tragedy, while for Pakistani writers, it is a great achievement that is synonymous with freedom.

R.K. Agnihotri doubts whether Partition can be considered as final because an integrated psyche of northern parts of the subcontinent since the time of Bhaktikaal cannot be permanently fractured. Satish Gujral recalls how one of the victims of Partition traces the impact of riots, brutality, abduction, rape and killings suffered by innocent peoples during and after Partition without any malice.

Partha Chatterjee, Badri Narain Tewari and Keshav Malik, in their articles discuss different genres of creativity that deal with Partition. Partha Chatterjee finds its recurrent presence in Ritwick Ghatak’s films through memory images while Badri Narain discovers the strands of Partition in naach drama, folk songs and proverbs of the Bhojpur region. Keshav Malik, in his article, shows how Satish Gujral expressed the pathos of Partition in his paintings by portraying anguished men and women in the throes of ruination, when all was lost.

 


Bhisham Sahni, one of the famous writers on Partition and author of Tamas, in his interview with Alok Bhalla, emphasises the harmony in which religious affairs of different communities could be conducted in an atmosphere of tolerance. He considers Partition a mistake, the result of a fatal ideology of religious politics.

Mrinal Pandey by reviewing the life, literature and politics of the two countries observed that neither India nor Pakistan has recovered fully from the deep hurt suffered during Partition. The author believes that communal riots targeting the minorities, Dalits and Backward Classes in both the countries are assault on the basic principles of democracy in India. These riots deny basic concept of an egalitarian brotherhood and solidarity on which Pakistan was built.

Urvashi Butalia has invited the common people, mostly uprooted from their homes, to record the hitherto unrecorded memories of the joint past in the book The Other Side of Silence. She has dug out the unsung human actors, recorded their memories and reproduced their version verbatim. Manmayee Basu also narrates the experiences of uprooted women and men weaving moving tapestries of violence and indignity suffered by them. Both of them try to explore the history through the memories of the unknown and anonymous by placing the oral evidence along with the conventional. Nandi Bhatia also believes that literary works provide an alternative source of history. He feels that these marginal experiences are intrinsic part of the Partition saga not available in official records.

K.S. Duggal shows how Partition was handled with resilience and sensitivity by the uprooted Punjabis. A majority of them cherish a natural desire to revisit their homes. Mushirul Hasan represents the common thought that Partition was brought about by hot-headed and cynical politicians who failed to grasp the implications of division on religious lines.

Anindita Mukhopadhyay, Sukrita Paul Kumar, Alok Bhalla, Sadat Hasan Manto and Asaduddin have captured the poignant moments of Partition in their short stories. In Bengali literature, one finds a paradox that in one genre only poetry depicts Partition events in detail, while stories and novels do not. Tapti Chakravarti endeavours to unravel this paradox with the help of novels.

Naresh Jain depicts the changing Muslim attitude through Attia Husain’s novel Sunlight On a Broken Column which presents the tragedy of Partition with greater objectivity and questions ‘how can we live together as a nation if the differences between the communities are continuously preached’?

Jayanti Chattopadhyay discusses two Bengali plays written in the first decade after Partition, namely Salil Sen’s Natun Ihudi and Tulsidas Lahiri’s Banglar Mati. The plays depicted Bhadralok’s desire to valourise the cultural unity of Bengal and propagated the rhetoric of Hindu-Muslim unity. She draws attention to the problems faced by play writers.

Kamlesh Mohan deals with a story based on Kashmiri Lal Zakir’s novel Karamanwali. Karamanwali represents the agonising internal journey of that generation of women whose children were left behind while they migrated to India or Pakistan. It is based on a real incident of a mother looking for her son. In the process, she experiences the gory and dehumanising conditions of a ‘refugee’ camp.

Discussing Kushwant Singh’s novel Train to Pakistan depicting life of a small village situated on the border of India, Shikoh Mohsin Mirza exposes the event that led to the transformation of a sleepy village on one night of August 1947 into a cauldron of conflicting loyalties when a train load of massacred men, women and children arrive in the village.

The book on the whole weaves a fine tapestry of various strands of Partition. A major refrain of the book is that in spite of the creation of two nations, a bond of oneness can be clearly discerned among the divided. People cherish in their hearts a kind of nostalgia for the undivided past. The people-to-People interaction may hopefully lead to better relations between India and Pakistan in future.

The book is of immense significance for academicians, researchers, planners, policy-makers, politicians and bureaucrats, besides students of sociology, history and political science and for general readers. It is a storehouse of data for Partition events.