|
Discussing the differences between men and
women as diplomats, the veteran among them, Madeleine Albright of USA,
stated that the greatest difference she found was that lady diplomats
paid more attention to the context of a particular problem while their
male counterparts tend to look exclusively at the problem in hand. She
also felt that the women’s aptitude for developing relationships was
an important in furthering diplomatic relations. During the crisis at
Kosavo, at the time of her tenure as the US Secretary of State, Albright
said that she would make it a point to call all her 15 colleagues
involved every day and it was accepted that whatever be the crisis, all
the diplomats involved would take each others’ phone calls.
But it has been a hard
struggle for the Indian women to climb in the diplomatic ladder.
Muthamma, one of the first entrants in the IFS cadre in 1949 (first in
the IFS list and third in the all-India list), wrote about her
experiences and how she had to face innumerable "imaginary
problems" created by the IFS hierarchy. Finally, tired of being
ignored for appointment as an ambassador. Muthamma, successfully
appealed to the Supreme Court of India and the Government of India had
to change its policy of gender discrimination. Even then, Muthamma was
promoted only at the last moment, as the Ambassador to Ghana so that the
Government of India could make a submission to the Supreme Court that
they were not guilty of discrimination. At one time if a lady diplomat
got married, she had to leave the IFS. This rule was overturned only in
1964. As such the question of being posted together, when the lady
diplomat and her spouse were both in the IFS did not arise. But today,
at Consul levels, couples can be accommodated in the same embassy. In
cases where this is not possible, they are posted as near as possible.
Again in the 1970s,
another reason the higher ups advanced against making Muthamma an
Ambassador was that often diplomats (especially in the African
countries) had to go to the airport, at 3 a.m in the morning (for seeing
off the local Head of State on his foreign trips), and it would not do
to have the Indian Ambassador raped by highway robbers!. Her request to
be allowed to take her mother with her to help out as the hostess at
diplomatic parties was refused. Another point raised was that many in
nations like Iran diplomats would not be allowed to meet a non-burqa-clad
woman.
Our lady diplomats have
executed their task with great verve. Next to Chokila Iyer, Nirupama Rao
the spokesperson of the External Publicity Division with Monika Mohata
assisting her, can be said to be the highest ranking diplomat in the
IFS. Before her appointment to the present post Nirupama Rao was the
ambassador to Lima, served in Russia during the cold war years, is a
specialist on China and is fluent in German and Spanish.
Ms Kochar, our
ambassador to Fiji a decade ago carried out her duties without fear even
when anti-India feelings in the country rose. In recent times the most
challenging task for any Indian diplomat has been that of Arundhati
Ghose who represents the permanent representative to the United Nations,
when India carried out a nuclear test in Pokhran in 1998, nuclear powers
and ensured almost single-handedly the defeat of the Comprehensive Test
Ban Treaty.
Today out of 775-strong officer cadres
of the IFS, only ten per cent are ladies. Twenty are ambassadors and
department chiefs. Six are joint secretaries and one an additional
secretary. Fifteen per cent of all Indian Foreign Service personnel are
women. This compares well with international arena, where only ten out
of the 189 ambassadors to the United Nations are women. It is also a
fact that for women civil servant aspirants today the IFS is no longer
the first choice, but the second and third one. The creature comforts in
India, especially the availability of servants seem to be a great
incentive to join IAS. Still women are on the march and in 2001, half of
the new IFS probationers were women.
|