On that fateful night in 1984, more than
2,000 died immediately after the leakage and over 2,00,000 of the city's
total population of 7,00,000 were directly affected. What followed was a
devastating impact of the chemicals on the eyes, lungs and
gastro-intestinal systems. Gynaecological and obstetric complications
soon became apparent, as did immunological changes, neurological
disorders, higher incidence of cancer and emotional and mental stress.
Unfortunately, the devastating impact continued till date.
Tardy compensation,
inadequate and inappropriate medical treatment and absence of economic
rehabilitation for the debilitated survivors characterised the post-gas
leak scenario in Bhopal. In 1989, the Indian Government arrogated to
itself the sole power to represent all victims under the Bhopal Gas Leak
Act and settled for a sum of US $470 million — nearly one-seventh of
the original claim of US $3 billion.
This infamous
settlement and disregard for health and the environment by the Union
Carbide were lessons in lack of corporate accountability and gross
injustice to those affected by the disaster.
Even as Union Carbide
merged with Dow Chemical in 2001 to form the largest chemical
corporation in the world, the Bhopal Fact Finding Mission, comprising
experts from different fields set out to investigate the condition of
the people and the state of the environment at the site of the disaster.
The mission focussed on several aspects ranging from medical and mental
health to economic, legal and social aspects.
The study revealed that
continuous contamination of groundwater, soil and breast milk presented
a serious health threat not only to those currently exposed to the
contamination but also to future generations.
According to experts,
the evidence suggested that toxic chemicals had not only moved across
various mediums, but trophic transfer of these chemicals through the
food chain had caused these chemicals to become part of the system.
"The wide spectrum of toxic chemicals detected in the human body
itself is a dangerous signal," said Nair.
These chemicals could
alter the normal physiological processes in the human body and had a
long-term impact on the reproductive, immune and nervous systems.
Infants and children were the most vulnerable to these toxic chemicals.
Other effects of chemical pollutants included carcinogenicity,
mutagenicity and chromosomal aberrations. Of special significance was
'synergism', whereby even minute quantities of two or more of these
toxic chemicals in the human body could cause immense harm.
Chlorinated
hydrocarbons, sometimes called 'environmental hormones', are also
endocrine disrupters. That is, they interfered with the normal
functioning of the endocrine system — cells and glands in the body
that secrete hormones, the chemical messengers that regulate bodily
processes.
These toxic chemicals
remained intact (that is they were not bio-degradable) and had a
disastrous tendency to accumulate in fatty tissue. Environmental
estrogens might increase the risk of breast cancer. They could also
cause other reproductive disorders like prolonged menstruation,
sterility, low sperm count and repeated miscarriages.
Of serious concern was
the fact that they could be passed on to the next generation through
breast milk. Human breast milk samples, taken from the women living in
the area and studied by the FFM, showed maximum concentrations of VOCs
and a higher concentration of pesticides in breast milk, showing that
these carcinogenic toxics were bio-concentrated in breast milk.
"This poses a serious concern to infants, as it is the easiest and
shortest route of exposure to these potentially carcinogenic
chemicals," said the report.
According to current
toxicological knowledge, there was no acceptable level for these toxic
compounds. In children, even low dosage toxicity could lead to endocrine
disruption and hormonal malfunctions, effects of which might only emerge
at puberty. In addition to the amount of exposure, the timing also
seemed to be of importance. Exposure during foetal development or early
infancy could have serious implications for future development.
"The worst part of
the disaster is probably yet to come," said Nair, speaking about
the teratogenic effects. These toxic chemicals could cause mutations and
chromosomal aberrations, birth defects in babies born to the exposed
population, indicating a strong likelihood of congenital malformations
in the generations to come.
One fallout of this has
been the fact that people were reluctant to marry those who were exposed
to the gas, especially since the men who were exposed and were now
married either did not have offspring or had deformed offspring. Many
women were hesitant to marry men who were exposed to the gas because of
a fear of sterility, miscarriages or malformed children.
While the tragedy
continued till date, with affected people forced to consume contaminated
water and food, it was apparent that the grim lessons of Bhopal were yet
to be learnt. "While the post-Bhopal scenario realigned thinking on
the impact of chemicals on human health and environment, this has yet to
be translated into practice," said the report.
The seemingly
wide-ranging Environment Protection Act enacted in 1996 and other laws
which it spawned, followed the limited path of regulation and
end-of-pipe solutions, without examining the processes which led to the
generation of hazardous wastes.
The post-Bhopal era
also saw worldwide regulation on chemicals and toxicity and a demand by
communities for the right to information and to be participants in the
process of choosing sites for industries. Yet, as Tomas Mac Sheoin's
report on the Union Carbide Corporation noted, "It is one of the
bitter ironies of Bhopal that its major reformist effects were felt in
Union Carbide's home country." Inspired by the disaster and the
public response to it, the US increased its regulatory activities. One
major step forward came through the setting up of the Toxic Releases
Inventory and other freedom-of-information measures that greatly
increased public access to information on toxic chemical releases.
In India, however, community struggles
have had little success in gaining the 'right to know' whereby people
could identify any contaminated sites in their areas. Why go so far?
Because, as Nair pointed out, many people even in Bhopal were not aware
of the hazardous impact of contaminated ground water. Others, though
aware of the contamination, continued to consume it because the
government had not provided any alternative sources of potable water.
|