Jammu, January 24
What role is the 23-member APHC conglomerate supposed to play in the wake of Pakistan’s crackdown on religious extremists and some militant groups?
This question seems to weigh heavy on the minds of the seven members of the executive committee of the APHC who have received confusing signals from senior functionaries of the US, the UK and the German embassies in Delhi. The APHC had sent a three-member team to Delhi to interact with functionaries of several embassies in order to get a feedback on their stand on the Kashmir issue.
Inside reports said after the three APHC leaders decided to cut short their visit in protest against the police crackdown on Hurriyat leaders in Kashmir, senior officials of the US, the UK and the German embassies visited the APHC headquarters in Delhi where they held discussions with the Hurriyat leaders.
According to these reports some embassy officials favoured restoration of greater autonomy to the state, others suggested that an independent Kashmir could be the solution to the vexed problem. Yet others wanted APHC leaders to contest the Assembly poll.
It is in this context that the APHC executive committee is meeting shortly in Srinagar where it will explore the possibility of entering into the poll fray. The Hurriyat team is said to have conveyed to the foreign diplomats that they were not totally opposed to participating in the elections provided the poll was supervised by international observers and held with the purpose of establishing which political group was the genuine representative of the people of Kashmir.
They informed the embassy officials that they could not be party to the campaign which the state and the Central governments invariably launched during the poll that the elections amounted to a mandate in favour of the state’s accession to India.
The opinion in the APHC continues to be divided over the participation in the next Assembly poll. The People’s Conference Chairman, Mr Abdul Gani Lone, the JKLF chief, Mohammad Yasin Mailk, and Molvi Abbas Ansari, a Shia leader, seem to be inclined to participate in the elections if international observers are appointed to supervise the elections. Delhi has so far not agreed to this demand. It is ready to appoint some Indian intellectuals, suggested by the separatists, as observers.
Indications are that the APHC and other separatist leaders are under pressure to participate in the elections, directly or indirectly, to upset the National Conference applecart. They have been told by some of their supporters that if the National Conference won the next Assembly poll it would be treated as the genuine representative of the people of Kashmir and for six years the role of the APHC would be confined to the four walls of its headquarters.
The APHC has also been told that in the event of tripartite talks materialising in the future the APHC will have no legitimate claim for acting as the people’s representatives in the parleys.
For the time being the APHC may not announce any clear-cut policy on its participation in the elections because it may lose public credibility. Its leaders are not sure whether their candidates will be able to win and as such it will not expose its inherent infirmity in carrying people with it.
But it is firm on rejecting the Democratic Freedom Party chief, Mr Shabir Ahmed Shah’s suggestion that he will rejoin the conglomerate provided all its constituents are merged into the APHC. The Chairman of the APHC, Prof Abdul Gani Bhat, said, “We cannot accept Mr Shah’s suggestion.” He said it was not possible for the Jamait-e-Islami, the Awami Action Committee, the JKLF and the People’s Conference to close their shops and merge with the APHC.
Professor Bhat said Mr Shah was in the habit of “floating ideas” which were too ethereal to be practicable. He said the doors of the APHC were open for Mr Shah who could be a member of the General Council.
Indications are that the APHC will like to adopt a wait-and-watch policy instead of risking its separate existence by announcing its willingness to participate in the elections. Even if it favours taking part in the elections it will impose some severe conditions which the government and the Election Commission may not accept.