The Tribune - Spectrum
 
ART & LITERATURE
'ART AND SOUL
BOOKS
MUSINGS
TIME OFF
YOUR OPTION
ENTERTAINMENT
BOLLYWOOD BHELPURI
TELEVISION
WIDE ANGLE
FITNESS
GARDEN LIFE
NATURE
SUGAR 'N' SPICE
CONSUMER ALERT
TRAVEL
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
CAPTION CONTEST
FEEDBACK


Sunday
, January 6, 2002
Books

The non-ideology of Taliban and its threat to Pakistan itself
Review by Parshotam Mehra

Taliban: the Story of the Afghan Warlords
by Ahmed Rashid. Pan Books, London. Pages xx+276.

Taliban: the Story of the Afghan WarlordsWITH Mullah Omar and his close comrade-in-arms, the Al-Qaeda chief, Osama bin Laden, literally on the run and an uneasy interim government in the saddle in Kabul, is the trauma of the Taliban finally over? Hard to say and difficult to believe. For a close reading of the slender volume under review would seem to suggest a different story. And return an emphatic no for an answer. The last word it would appear remains still to be said and Ahmed Rashid tells us why it will be a long time before it is.

Ever since his unceremonious exit from the throne almost 30 years ago (1973), Zahir Shah’s Afghanistan has known little if any peace. To the contrary, it has today become an embattled land where troops drawn from at least half a dozen nations, aided and abetted by as many Afghan factions, are engaged in a grim war promising to return a modicum of peace to a benighted land. The latest in nearly a dozen revolutions, all bloody and wasteful of human life and limb, the Taliban’s acquired dimensions, which threatened not only neightbouring lands but also even those far removed from Kabul and its environs. For both the Taliban and its understudy, the Al-Qaeda threaten peace on a scale rarely known in human history. In the event, Rashid’s timely book unfolds a grim if tragic tale that makes for compulsive reading.

 


Apart from its new post-September 11 foreword, introduction and conclusion, Rashid has divided his book into three nearly equal parts. The first deals with the history of the Taliban movement while the second relates to the brand of Islam it stands for. And the third maps out the contours of the "New Great Game" for the control of the energy resources of Central Asia in the new millennium. In which Afghanistan at the crossroads between Iran, the Arabian Sea and India occupies the centre stage. While a host of players - Russia, Turkey, Israel, the USA and Pakistan - are deeply involved. And New Delhi is not exactly disinterested.

The story of the Taliban is briefly told with its starting point in Kandahar in the spring of 1994 where a nondescript one-eyed Mullah Omar of the Ghilzai branch of the Pashtuns started by organising a small group of the Taliban, young religious zealots coming out of madrasas in neighbouring Pakistan in a war against the province’s rapacious warlords. He soon attracted more and more followers because with the mujahideen (1992-94) in Kabul on the brink of disintegration and worse, he offered succour and asked for no reward. Except that those who followed him should help set up a just Islamic system. Presently, the mullah’s missions were going around gauging the mood of other commanders in Herat, at the Mazar-e-Sharief and in Kabul. And slowly but surely he gained ground not so much by superior armed prowess as sabotage and monetary inducements.

The Taliban launched their surprise offensive on Jalalabad in August, 1996 and by September-end they had captured Kabul. The mujahideen and their Northern Alliance now appeared ready for the taking. And were soon on the run. Sadly, the Taliban conquest of Herat and Mazar-i-Sharif punctuated by gory if gruesome massacres of the non-Pashtuns, brought Afghanistan almost to the brink of ethnic fragmentation. With the Uzbeks and the Tajiks in the north and the west and the miniscule Hazaras in the middle up against a relentless Pashtun onslaught. Nor was that all. For the Taliban capture of a number of towns on the Tajikistan border created a near panic in the Central Asian republics. Oddly, even as the Taliban appeared to be winning control of the entire country (1998), the regime was internationally isolated and condemned as a pariah state by all its neighbours. Barring, of course, Pakistan. In fact, a major ramification of General Musharraf’s coup (October, 1999) was enhanced military aid to the Taliban for its summer (2000) offensive. Which earned the new Pakistan regime no end of international opprobrium.

A word on the Taliban interpretation of Islam, jihad and social transformation. To start with, it is necessary to underline that the Taliban was neither radical Islamicists, nor mystical Sufis, nor yet traditionalists. They fitted nowhere in the Islamic spectrum of ideas and movements that had emerged between 1979 and 1994. It has been suggested that the distortion and collapse of legitimacy of all three trends into a naked, rapacious struggle for power created an ideological vacuum, which the Taliban came to fill. The fact is that the Taliban represented nobody but themselves and recognised no Islam except their own. Their Islamic fundamentalism was aggressive, expansionist and uncompromising. Representing a back-to-basics idealism in a faithful reproduction of Islamic society that existed shortly after the Prophet’s death (632 AD).One of the most regressive of regimes, the Taliban was not only harsh on women but also men, especially the non-Pakhtuns.

Thus all Kabul males were given just six weeks to grow a full beard, even though some of the ethnic groups - the Hazaras, for instance - have limited beard growth. More, beards could not be trimmed shorter than a man’s fist. The religious police stood at street corners with scissors cutting off long hair and often beating culprits. Men had to wear their salwars above the ankle and everyone had to say his/her prayers five times a day. All conceivable forms of entertainment were strictly taboo: movies, TV, video, music, dance. Even, kiteflying! "Nawroz", the traditional Afghan New Year celebrations, were declared un-Islamic. Nobody was allowed to hang paintings, portraits or photographs in their homes. The tragic truth is that the very idea of culture was alien to the Taliban.

Thanks to their myopic vision and unimaginative policies, hardly any educated or professional class was left in the country. In the several waves of refugees who left after 1992, most of the educated, trained professionals - even telephone operators, electricians and mechanics said goodbye. In the event, the Taliban manning the departments of finance, economy and the social sectors were mullah traders-businessmen, truck transporters and smugglers. Their sole interest was expanding the market for smuggling and the trucking business across the region. The Taliban’s war was run from Mullah Omar’s tin trunks stuffed with money which he kept under his bed. There was no national budget for which there was no expertise in any case. The warlords were not even remotely concerned with planning for the reconstruction of the country. In the event, Afghanistan’s "black hole" was getting larger and wider, sucking in more and more of its population and the people of the region into it.

A word on Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda. The Taliban’s contact with the Arab-Afghans and their pan-Islamic, Wahabi ideology came only after the capture of Kabul in 1996. Pakistan was closely involved in introducing Laden to the Taliban leadership in Kandahar because it wanted to retain the Khost training camps for Kashmiri militants, which were now in Taliban hands. Bin Laden endeared himself to the Taliban leadership by sending several hundred Arab-Afghans to participate in the 1997 and 1998 offensives in the north where his Wahabi fighters had a clear hand in large-scale massacres of the Shia Hazaras. Inter alia Bin Laden was also responsible for hardening the Taliban’s anti-West, anti-US stance. Earlier Mullah Omar’s men were prepared to cut a deal with Washington: making Bin Laden leave the country in return for US recognition.In the bargain, the Arab-Afghans had come full circle. From being mere appendages to the Afghan jihad and the cold war in the 1980s they had taken centre stage for the Afghans, neighbouring countries and the West in the 1990s. The US had to pay a heavy price for ignoring Afghanistan between 1992-96 while the Taliban was providing sanctuary to the most hostile and militant Islamic fundamentalist movement the world had witnessed in the post-cold war decades.

A word on the New Great Game. In the mid-1990s, even as Turkmenistan economy tumbled, plans were initiated for a 5,000-mile long oil and gas pipeline eastwards to China that would cost over $ 20 billion. The same year saw the Argentine oil company, Bridas, proposing a pipeline that would cross Afghanistan and carry gas to India and Pakistan. The US company Unocal, with Washington’s tacit support, had prepared a similar pipeline plan in 1995.Turkey too became an active partner. Its need for energy and desire to expand its influence prompted successive Turkish governments for becoming the principal route for Central Asian energy exports. The old Great Game was about perceived threats in which force was never directly used; Russia and Great Britain marked out borders and concluded treaties creating Afghanistan - and Tibet - as a buffer between them. The new great game for the oil and gas riches of the landlocked Central Asia has invited intense competition between the regional states and western oil companies.

In a brief but acute survey Rashid concludes that the military-bureaucratic-intelligence elite that has guided Pakistan’s destiny since the 1950s has never allowed civil society to function. Only this elite has the right to determine the nature of the threat to Pakistan’s national security and its solution, and not elected governments, parliament, civic organisations or even common sense. More, Zia-ul-Haq had dreamt of creating a Sunni Muslim space between "infidel" Hindustan, "heretic" (because Shia) Iran and a "Christian" Russia. And hoped that the message of the Afghan mujahideen could spread into Central Asia, revive Islam and create a Pakistan-led Islamic bloc of nations. Sadly, Zia’s shortsighted successors failed to realise the full ramifications of this legacy. In the event, Rashid avers, Pakistan is now ripe for a Taliban-type Islamic revolution which would almost certainly jeopardise stability in West, South and Central Asia.

There is lot more to this little book than the preceding paragraphs. It unveils an appalling story, of a ruined land and its ravished people; of a Hobbesian state of war, of the secretive and bizarre Taliban leadership; of an overspill of chaos, narcotics, and sectarian violence; of the bewildering complexity of Afghan politics. A fascinating, if a grim and grisly, tale. Ahmed Rashid’s "Taliban" has long been in the making: 21 years! Rashid, a veteran Pakistani journalist who has known Afghanistan like the back of his palm, has been reporting on the country for almost as many years and is well-known to the readers of Daily Telegraph of London and Hong Kong’s prestigious weekly, the Far Eastern Economic Review. And nearer home, in his own country’s the Nation. He has been bewitched by Afghanistan, both the country and its people, "the most extraordinary on earth".

First published last year as "Taliban: Islam, Oil and the New Great Game in Central Asia", the book was a runaway success and has reappeared in its new incarnation. Again, and deservedly, a best seller. Interested readers may find another recent study, Peter Bergen, "Holy War Inc: Inside the Secret World of Osama Bin Laden" a useful and rewarding supplement.