Saturday,
May 12, 2001, Chandigarh, India
|
|
PAUTA supports agitating students Ludhiana, May 11 The president of the PAUTA, Dr Hari Singh Brar, and the secretary, Dr M.L. Gupta, have addressed a letter to the Chief Minister asking him to sympathetically consider the demands of the students. Stating the students’ demands as ‘just’ and the ‘need of the hour’ the PAUTA authorities have said due to the shrinking opportunities the students were intimidated by their future. In the letter the association said the students grievances needed to be redressed by opening them more avenues of employment. The PAUTA also said the agricultural graduates should be recruited as agriculture masters in schools, without possessing a B.Ed. degree. They further said the agricultural graduates had to spend four years for their degree after 10+2 level whereas the students with B.Sc in medical or non-medical had to spend three years. The PAUTA authorities further wrote to the CM that these students were taught social sciences and teaching methods during their course. They asked the CM to fill the various posts of the agricultural Development Officers lying vacant in the different departments of the state. Stating that the ADOs were a connecting link between the government and rural population, the president and general secretary said the issuance of revised notification for restoring the status and pay scale of the ADOs should be expedited. Meanwhile, the strike entered third day today. Girls of the college also joined the hunger strike. The Vice-Chancellor, Dr K.S. Aulakh, said he was trying his level best to arrange a meeting of agitating students with ministers. He said he had sent a fax message to the Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister and was yet to get a reply. He said he was hopeful that the CM would meet students on May 15 here. |
Forum quashes PSEB
demand Ludhiana, May 11 According to the complaint, the board officials had visited the complainant house in his absence and removed electric meter without any prior notice to him. After that the consumer was issued a bill of Rs 1,28,943 and it was not mentioned how such a demand was raised, he added. The PSEB pleaded that the meter of the consumer was checked on September 6, 2000, and the officials observed some problem in the meter. The respondent stated that after testing of the meter at site with standard heater load and stopwatch method, it was found that the meter was recording less consumption by 80 per cent. The respondent further stated that later, the meter was sent to the ME laboratory after packing and sealing it properly and it was found in the laboratory that its seals were tampered with and it was recording less consumption of energy by 90.35 per cent. The board alleged that it was a clear case of theft of energy and as such the said demand was raised. The forum observed that the checking report was not signed by the consumer or his representative and he was not given notice to be present at the time of checking of the meter in the laboratory which was mandatory. The forum held that the disputed demand was liable to be quashed since the same was not raised as per rules. |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 121 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |