Saturday,
May 12, 2001, Chandigarh, India
|
|
SSC exams on July 29 Chandigarh, May 11 Educational qualification prescribed for the post is a bachelor’s degree in commerce from a recognised university/CA/ICWA/CS. The candidate should be between the age of 18 and 27 as on August 1, 2001. However, age relaxation will be admissible to SC, ST, OBC aspirants as per government orders. The examination Fee is Rs 50. The SC, ST, ex-servicemen and physically handicapped candidates are exempted from the fee. The format application has been published in the Employment News/Rozgar Samachar of May 5, 2001. The last date for receipt of applications is June 1, 2001. In case of candidates residing in Assam, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, Sikkim, J and K, Lahaul and Spiti and the Pangi subdivision in Chamba, Himachal Pradesh, the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, the Lakshdweep and for candidates residing abroad the last date is June 15, 2001. |
PU students to gain
from early results Chandigarh, May 11 Undue delay in declaration of results had been slowly creeping up as a permanent feature in the system for the past few years. The result schedule advanced as far as August and even September in certain cases. The university has already declared results of BA I (compartment in English compulsory) conducted this year. The results for BA II (English compulsory compartment) were declared today. The final year results for the same paper are scheduled by May 15. Results of all the three years for regular commerce classes are scheduled to be declared by May 31. This “prepones” the result by above a month as compared to last year. The results of BA and B.Sc. classes are planned to be declared by June 30. Mr Ashok Raj Bhandari, the joint controller of examinations, said that the final year result would be declared first, followed by the second year. Last year the results were out only by August. This time the process has advanced by over two months. The results of postgraduate arts and science branch courses are scheduled by June 30. Results of MA Punjabi were declared on September 28 last year. This means the results are early by nearly three months in certain cases. Mr Bhandari said that the new scheme was yielding desired results. There can, at the maximum, be a week’s deviation from plans. PU, for the first time after nearly six years, is having on-the-spot marking for postgraduate classes for nine subjects. These include English, Punjabi, Hindi, History, Political Science, Economics, Public Administration, Mathematics and Geography. These subjects add up to nearly 90 per cent of the university’s total work. A significant portion of other courses are at the university level only and not offered in affiliated colleges. The Head of Department is the chief coordinator for postgraduate classes. He is also the head examiner. Mr Bhandari said there has been co-operation from various departments for speeding up the evaluation process. The evaluation process is followed by an approximately three weeks’ job by the administrative branch for compilation and declaration of results. The timely declaration of results is vital for the final year students seeking admissions in outside institutes and those affiliated to other universities as the date of admission for these students is not altered if PU declares the results late. |
Painting
contest results Chandigarh, May 11 According to a statement issued here today, the first three winners in each category would be given cash awards of Rs 1,000, Rs 750 and Rs 500 each, respectively. The prizes would be given away at a function to be organised at the Air Force Officers Institute, Sector 31, on May 15. Besides, four consolation prizes in each category would be awarded. The first three winners in the order of merit in various categories are: Sub-juniors: Sunil Kumar (Manav Mangal School, Panchkula), Tania Verma (Hansraj School, Panchkula) and M. Ananya (Sacred Heart School, Chandigarh). Juniors: Shruti Bamba (Little Flower, Panchkula), Gagandeep (Gurunanak Public School, Chandigarh) and Shubhojeet (St Xaviers, Chandigarh). Seniors: Neena Majumdar (Bhavan Vidyalaya, Chandigarh), Stanzin Dukygais (St Xaviers, Chandigarh) and Akanksha Mittal (Hansraj School, Panchkula). |
HIGH COURT
Chandigarh, May 11 Allowing the petition filed by Ms Ratni, the Bench, comprising Mr Justice Amar Bir Singh Gill and Mr Justice V.S. Aggarwal, observed that the counting of votes was undertaken on the first day of polling and as such the voters exercising their right to franchise on the adjourned date were aware of the possible outcome. The petitioner as such was justified in contending that the counting of votes on the first day had affected the voting pattern on the adjourned date. The Judges concluded: “The election of the respondent in these circumstances was the outcome of the election process not ordained by law and has to be set aside”. In her petition, Ms Ratni had contended that the elections, held on March 12 last year, had to be adjourned to March 15, 2000, following disturbance during the polling process. She had added that slips enabling the voters to poll on the adjourned date were not issued by the presiding officer to all those present at the booths. Her counsel had added on her behalf that certain voters were allowed to poll after forging the slips. Students allowed
to take exams
Issuing notice of motion for May 30 to the state of Punjab and two other respondents, a Division Bench of the High Court on Friday allowed two students of a polytechnic at Jalandhar to take the sixth semester examinations. Pronouncing the orders, the Bench, comprising Mr Justice N.K. Sodhi and Mr Justice R.C. Kathuria, observed: “Counsel for the petitioners contends that out of 16 students whose names appeared in a notice dated May 2, eight had been allowed to take the examinations even though they were short of lectures and that the petitioners were being meted out with discriminatory treatment.... The petitioners will be allowed to take the examination which has already commenced. This will be provisional and subject to further orders by the court”. In their petition, Sukhdial Singh and Harpreet Singh had earlier sough the quashing of the notice preventing them for appearing in the examination due to attendance shortage. Terming the alleged action of the respondents permitting some of the students with lesser attendance to sit for the examination as “illegal and arbitrary,” the petitioners had claimed that it was also against the principles of natural justice. Probe demanded
In a petition before the High Court, member of Parliament Simranjit Singh Mann on Friday sought independent probe into the recruitment of personnel by the Punjab Police in Muktsar and Faridkot districts. Directions to the state of Punjab, the Director General of Police and four other respondents for quashing the appointments of unqualified candidates as constables was also sought. The petition is likely to be taken up for hearing on May 14. Quoting newspaper reports, Mr Mann stated that servants and workers in the house, fields and factories of the Punjab Chief Minister and his relatives had been appointed as constables in Punjab Police. He added that some of the constables were not even qualified. Some others had not even applied. Referring to a news item in Punjabi Tribune, his counsel, Mr Ranjan Lakhanpal, added on the petitioner’s behalf that a VIP training school had also been set up. The school, he asserted, was in the home district of the Chief Minister and as such the action was discriminatory. |
Bomb hoax disrupts work in District
Courts Chandigarh, May 11 Sources in the Police Department revealed that at about 2 p.m. an employee of the court informed the control room that he had got a call from an unknown person that a bomb had been planted on the court premises. Unknown caller” informed the employee that two kashmiries had left the two bags containing explosive material on the court premises. Soon after receiving the information, about 25 police personnel including the Superintendent of police(city), Mr Baldev Singh and the SHO, Mr Arjun Singh Jaggi, along with bomb defusing squad with sniffer dog and metal detectors, reached the spot. After that the lawyers and litigants were directed to leave the court premises and the search operation was carried out for nearly two hours. The President of the District Bar Association, Mr H.S Hundal, said, “ It was the third hoax call of this year and in order to save the invaluable time of the courts, the authorities should take strict action against the culprits who are responsible for such hoax calls. Ms Anil Kaur, a litigant complains that it was fourth time when her case was adjourned due to a hoax call and she was going to file a complaint in the police station. Another 85-year-old litigant, Mr Swaran Singh, said that the hoax call had made life of a number of a litigants miserable who are coming here from out stations. So authorities should take serious action against those who are responsible for such act. The Vice-President of the District Bar Association, Mr Ashok Chauhan, said” There is need to widen the only entrance gate to reduce the crowd at the time of bomb hoax. Moreover, a team comprising of court authority, DSP and members of the bar had earlier inspected the gate after last bomb hoax and have decided to widen the gate but till date no action has been taken by the authorities. |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 121 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |