|
GURU
Gobind Singh, the tenth Nanak, is the spiritual father of the Khalsa
Singhs and it is to be expected that his writings are revered by the
Khalsa. However, the Nihangs are the only ones among the Sikh
brotherhood, who hold the granth of the tenth Guru as worthy of
veneration where as the Tat Khalsa, who constitute the mainstream, are
ready to accept only some portions of the Dasam Granth as
genuine writings of Guru Gobind Singh.
The Dasam Granth
was compiled by a group of trusted devotees of Guru Gobind Singh under
the guidance of Bhai Mani Singh Shaheed after more than two decades of
hard work, because most of the writings of Guru Gobind Singh were lost
when he was treacherously attacked on the banks of the Sirsa by the
armies of the Hill chiefs and Mughal Emperor, Aurangzeb. It was after
the demise of Guru Gobind Singh that a search and compilation of his
writings was undertaken. When all the writings that could be traced
had been collected, a controversy among the leading Sikh scholars
arose on whether the writings ascribed to Guru Gobind Singh should be
bound in separate folios or together in one folio.
This was the time
when Massa Khan Ranghar, a local faujdar, had converted the
Harmandir Saheb into a dancing hall. Sardar Mahtab Singh and Sucha
Singh appeared before the sangat at the Damdama Saheb in 1740
to seek blessings for their enterprise to chastise Massa Ranghar. When
they were asked to give their views on the controversy regarding
compilation of the writings of Guru Gobind Singh, they said that if
they succeeded in accomplishing their mission of beheading Massa
Ranghar and returned in one piece, the writings of the 10th Guru
should be bound and kept in one folio, otherwise not. They
successfully returned to the Damdama Saheb with the severed head of
Massa Ranghar as their trophy.
One would have
expected that with such impeccable paternity, the Dasam Granth would
continue to be revered by the followers of the Guru. However, only
Takht Patna Saheb still has the practice of the Dasam Granth
occupying the same position as the Guru Granth Saheb in the
sanctum sanctorum of the gurdwara, commemorating the birth of Guru
Gobind Singh, whereas in other gurdwaras the Dasam Granth could
at best be seen in the gurdwara library.
It has to be stated
that after his escape from Chamkaur Saheb, Guru Gobind Singh undertook
to prepare and finalise the present recension of the Guru Granth
Saheb in which the writings of the ninth Guru, Guru Tegh Bahadur,
were added in appropriate ragas and his shlokas were
placed at the end. He spent about one year in completing this task at
the Damdama Saheb but he did not consider it worth his while to
recompile a granth of his bani nor did he include any of
his writings in the final compilation of the Guru Granth Saheb,
not even Jaap, Sudha Sawaiye and Chaupai, the three banis
which are prescribed for daily recitation of the amritdhari Sikhs.
The Sikhs brought up
in the Singh Sabha tradition find many of the contents of the Dasam
Granth difficult to digest. According to the Encyclopaedia of
Sikhism, 32 copies of the Granth were collected from
different places and brought to the Akal Takht in 1895, where a group
of eminent scholars pored over them, studying and discussing them
threadbare between July 5, 1895, and February 17, 1896. Among these
scholars were Bhai Manna Singh Hakim, Bhai Narain Singh, Bhai Thakur
Singh, Bhai Sant Singh (son of Giani Gian Singh), Bhai Bishan Singh,
Sant Gopal Das Udasi and Mahant Amir Singh. Opinions were invited from
a wider circle by correspondence, and a complete report on the
deliberations was published on October 14, 1897. The result was the
recension of the Dasam Granth now current.
Therefore, it seems
to be a bit late in the day to question credentials or authenticity of
the Dasam Granth. There is no doubt that the Dasam Granth
breaks new grounds in the Sikh religious tradition. The Guru Granth
Saheb is replete with references to Ram, Hari and Krishna and the Gurbani
also makes it clear that the Lord is Formless and One Reality. It
acknowledges that the Formless Being manifested Himself in Ram and
Krishan who could then perform the deeds ascribed to them and redeem
humanity. However, no such divinity is ascribed to any female goddess
in the Guru Granth Saheb.
Yet Guru Gobind Singh
went lyrical to describe the valour and deeds of Goddess Chandi/Durga.
Chandi di War is a part of the daily recitation of many Sikhs,
especially the Nihang Sikhs. He clearly establishes his heritage from
Lord Ramchandra, the son of Dasrath in Bachittar Natak which is
accepted as an authentic autobiographical writing of Guru Gobind
Singh. Many passages from it are sung with devotion in all gurdwaras.
It would be clear to
any scholar of Sikhism that although many of the contents of the Dasam
Granth may not fit in to the Singh Sabha mould of Sikhism, yet it
cannot be easily disowned. The scholars who question the bona fides of
the Rashtirya Sikh Sangat should also remember that the Rashtriya
Swayam Sevak Sangh for a long time had on the masthead of the Organiser
weekly, their official organ, a portrait of Guru Gobind Singh as
one of the three heroes of the Hindus, the other two being Shivaji and
Maharana Pratap. If the six Gurus in their bani could accept
Ram and Krishan manifesting divinity of the Supreme Being, it seems
that there is nothing wrong in Guru Gobind Singh describing Durga as
manifesting the divinity and power of One Supreme Being.
It is the Divine in
Ram or Krishan that is worthy of worship according to Gurbani,
so it is the Divine manifestation in Durga that calls for our
obeisance and that is how the daily Sikh prayer (ardas) starts
with invocation of Bhagauti before mentioning Guru Nanak’s
name. The Supreme Being is neither a male nor a female. The innovation
of Guru Gobind Singh seems to lie in invoking the formless Almighty
Being as a female.
The challenge before the scholars is
to understand the purpose, design, symbolism and true import of the
writings of Guru Gobind Singh rather than attributing motives to the
Rashtriya Sikh Sangat. Just because some writings of Guru Gobind Singh
do not fit into a particular mindset, those writings cannot just be
disowned, as such an act questions the wisdom of the trusted first
generation devotees of Guru Gobind Singh as well as the scholarship of
the group that had critically examined the Dasam Granth from
1895 to 1897
|