Sunday, January 8, 2000
F E A T U R E


Looking back in anger
Response
By Raj Bahadur Yadav

WE may look back but not in anger but with a cool head. Contrary to some eminent Indians’ views in ‘Looking back in anger’ (December 11). I believe that we have moved ahead as a people despite big failures in different spheres of life. The last hundred years have brought an end to monarchy, lessened to some extent, the evil of casteism had paved the way for the rise of the common people. The most spectacular gain of the 20th century has been the freedom of the country. The collective rise of the masses against the British Raj under the charismatic leadership of Mahatma Gandhi heralded the arrival of a new age in India. Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs took part actively in this glorious struggle against the British Raj and further strengthened the unity of the major communities. The common people became conscious of their collective strength for the first in our history. Mahatma Gandhi appealed to the masses immensely because of several reasons.One of them was his selfless devotion to the cause of freedom of India and his simple lifestyle.He came to attain the stature of Mahatma among the people because of his unique qualities of mind and heart. He was perhaps the most sensible and morally conscious leader our country ever produced.

  With the Independence of the country, the darkest days were left behind. The biggest achievement of our freedom struggle was the Indian Constitution. The light of the new age started percolating to towns and villages.The central government was now legally bound to protect the life and honour of the hitherto mercilessly exploited segments of Indian society: SCs and STs. Though the harsh realities didn’t change overnight at the village level yet a beginning had been made in the right direction. However large tracts of land were still in the direct possession of the upper caste landlords. Despite being in power for more than forty years, the Congress party fed the masses only on false promises and never carried out land reforms in the country. As a natural consequence of this gross negligence, the social relations did not undergo any fundamental change in the rural areas. Dalits and people belonging to backward castes continued facing the insults and humiliations at the hands of the local landlords even after Independence. The emergence of the middle class peasantry stirred the OBCs politically and they became conscious of their own importance as a very powerful social segment. In the present day India, most of the people are leading just a hand-to-mouth existence. They don’t have enough to eat and wear. Their children study in government schools which lack even basic facilities like potable water and adequate blackboards. Millions of villages still plunge into darkness after the sun sets. The link-roads are not properly laid out and the village folks have to live and die in squalor and disease. The other small but significant social layer is that of the rich and powerful living in big cities and towns.

In the recent years, this social group has emerged as a supporter of the reactionary right wing forces and hasty liberalisation of our economy. The capitalists are amassing huge amounts of wealth by exploiting the poor and the weak. The elites seem to have "hijacked" our democracy.

Poverty and unemployment are the fundamental problems of the people. In the late 70s the Janata Party government at the Centre promised to remove poverty and unemployment within ten years. Even after two decades, these problems still exist. A handful of capitalists have prospered at the cost of a majority of people.

Although the economy is growing this is not at all a pro-poor growth. The shining cars, costly computers, beautiful coloured T.V. sets are not what the masses need. The basic needs of the people are food, shelter and clothing. Millions of tonnes of foodgrain is rotting away in FCI (Food Corporation of India) godowns but poor people have to buy it at very high rates from the market. The PDS (Public Distribution System) lies paralysed because of the apathy of the officers.