|
Feeding culture vultures at home
By Suchita
Malik
IN a country as vast as ours,
there are bound to be numerous cultural currents that
never seem to meet. Take, for instance, the gulf between
North and South India and the question of language that
has been a bone of contention for a long time. The North
Indians casually dismiss all South Indians as
Madrasis without realising that many other
people and cultures thrive in the land south of the
Vindhayas. It may never strike them that they speak
different languages and can come from places other than
Madras, or Chennai as it is called now. Similarly, people
from South India do not feel at home with the bubbly,
happy-go-lucky sort of Punjabis.
Let alone the
North-South, or the East-West bloc, cultural
differences can be shockingly sharp within the same
territory as well. Take, for instance, Delhi, Haryana and
Punjab. Haryana may be touching Delhis boundaries
from three sides, yet there is a sea of difference as far
as the cultural life is concerned. While Haryana may
boast of its agri-culture, Delhi is an amalgamation of
various "nationalities", languages and cultures
which live together quite amicably.
A bride from the
metropolis in a Haryana household, would generally be
treated as an alien and also as one who has
come to "snatch away" their son from them. When
confronted with the same situation in the case of their
own daughter, nevertheless, they would all be ready to
redeem the situation by constantly referring to the right
of a woman to live away from the in-laws.
Comparing Delhis
culture with that of Haryana may be odious. Things ,
however, would virtually be at loggerheads when it comes
to Haryana and Punjab, the latter being the parent state.
Punjab, in 1966, was bifurcated into two separate
entities.This led to the forming of two separate
identities. Let alone the politicians gimmicks of
sharing water or conceding one territory for another, or
deciding the issue of the Capital once for all, the
cultural divide goes deeper into the psyche of the
people. It is hard for a Haryanvi to admit that Punjab
would always remain the mother-culture and that it has
branched out or manifested itself in various undertones
in many parts of Haryana.
These differences in
culture would be even sharper when it comes to the status
of women. The woman in Haryana generally has a lower
social status as compared to her counterpart in Punjab.
It would be a great shock for a woman from Punjab if she
were to venture into a Haryana household. Things may not
be made as intolerable for a bride who has come from the
South or, say, Bengal since she comes from a different
culture altogether and gets the benefit of doubt
automatically. But not so for a bahu from the
region.
Culturally speaking,
Haryana can be divided into three main areas, each under
a distinctive influence. The influence of Punjab and its
culture is more than evident in towns like Karnal,
Kurukshetra and Ambala; whereas districts like Rewari,
Narnaul, Bhiwani and Gurgaon have more in common with
Rajasthani culture. Thirdly, and most importantly, is
theJat heartland consisting of Rohtak, Jind, Panipat and
Sonepat districts. Their cultural roots, it is said, lie
in agri-culture. One notices while driving through the
state that women in Rohtak carry water on their heads and
work in the fields while the women in the northern parts
are generally not field-labourers.
It is primarily for this
reason that when it comes to marrying their daughter, the
people of Rohtak will prefer to go towards Karnal and
Ambala. But when it comes to get a bahu, they
would like a tough and hardy girl from the areas
bordering Rajasthan.
That leaves us wondering
what is this culture shock? Can the disparity
between any two cultures be so strong and wide that it
can result in a shock for the new entrant? Does it affect
the psyche of the person concerned and what can be its
long-term connotations? As it is, one who is an alien
needs all the co-operation, sympathy and affection to
adjust to a rather new set-up and environment. As such, a
negative and nagging attitude of the other community can
prove to be very detrimental in establishing a rapport.
Rather, it can result in strained relations for a
lifetime.
Diversity, in any form,
is the other name for change that sows the seeds for
improvement. A hostile and negative approach based on
caste considerations, can, however, stifle the natural
process of effecting positive changes that can contribute
to the societal transformation in the long run.
Broadly speaking, let us
look at the parameters, which may define and specify a
change in cultures. Different languages, linguistic tones
and accents, the very way of life itself make the culture
differences apparent. Very often, honest intentions take
a backseat and misunderstandings may occur due to the
harsh tone or the manner of speech of the other person. A
well- meaning Haryanvi, while saving the life of the
other person, may blurt out angrily, Marega ke?
(do you want to die?), which may send wrong signals to
the other person. The good gesture may be totally lost
due to the harshness of the language. A Haryanvi
sister-in-law, while actually in an affectionate mood
with her bhabhi may tell her , "Tu mere
gaon ke na, tu mere got ki na" etc. thus
appearing to be a heartless woman to one who doesnt
understand the nuances of the language or culture. A
woman from Punjab may take this well-meaning remark
otherwise.
Similarly, the
difference in the dress code is the most striking factor
that may go against a woman. A trouser-wearing
English-speaking woman will immediately become a target
of ridicule in an orthodox set-up. Once targeted thus,
all her good actions, qualities or honest intentions may
fall on deaf ears.
The same applies to food
habits as well. Differing tastes and cuisine are not
looked at favourably; rather they become a source of
thrusting insults at the other party. Haryanvi jats have
been traditionally been eating chane ki dal
but the moment it becomes cholle or even
rajmah, it becomes Punjabi food,
and, therefore, a source of ridicule.
Same is the case as far
as their living styles are concerned. Spending money on
any kind of personal comfort or clothes is strictly a
taboo in a typical rural Haryana household. As long as
the dress of a Haryanvi woman is a ghagra
choli or a yellow shirt with blue
salwar and a green dupatta,
everything is fine but the moment it becomes a matching
stylish salwar-kameez with an ethnic
dupatta, it becomes a serious threat to their
age-old customs. If their old women smoke a
bidi or hookah or take the
addictive snuff, it is all in order but all
hell will break loose if a young woman from another
culture is seen having a puff or two.
Each caste or community
has its own traits and characteristics and likes to
preserve them. There is nothing wrong with this provided
it does not result in looking down on others. But the
Indian land is perhaps unique in this respect. There are
a number of tribes among the Nagas but Tangkhul Nagas
consider themselves superior in the same manner as the
Deswalis do among the Jats and the Rathors among the
Rajputs. Thus, inter-caste conflict flourish unabated. It
is true that in a diverse society as ours, some
contradictions are natural and, perhaps, they are an
indication of the health of the social order, yet things
should not go so awry that it becomes insulting for an
individual to survive in a different culture.
|