The secrets of the sea route
By Manohar Malgonkar
LAST week, I wrote about the Silk
Route. How the Roman Emperor, Justinian instigated
Christian missionaries working in China to learn the
secrets of silk making and to start manufacturing silk in
Europe itself, and thus broke the stranglehold of the
Parsees on the lucrative silk trade and, in the process
killed off the Silk Route too.
But the Silk Route was not
the only channel for the movement of goods between Europe
and the Orient. There was the sea-route, too. And in
ancient and medieval times, just as the Iranians
controlled the Silk Route, so did the Arabs, control the
sea route.
The Arabs have always been
a hardy, adventurous people, with an inborn talent for
making money. Throughout the Middle Ages, which is the
period between the years 1000 and 1400 A.D., it was the
Arabs, conveniently situated as they were, almost midway
between Europe and Asia, who dominated sea trade between
the two continents.
Their frail, tub-like
dhows embarked upon voyages which customarily lasted for
a whole year or more. They had no navigational
instruments and only the stars to guide their paths. So
they kept within sight of the coast and made frequent
stops. And at each of these wayside ports they bought and
sold things.
The bulk of this trade was
with India where they bought such things as were in
demand in Europe: bolts of muslin, teak planks, peacock
feathers, perfumed oils, carved ivory and sandalwood,
lemon-grass and ginger root, and gems, but, above all,
pepper; pepper which grew so abundantly in the humid
forests of the Malabar coast. Before the discovery of the
new world and with it of the Mexican plant known as
chili, black pepper was the principal spice of Indian
curries and was a prized commodity in Europe where they
had begun to season their food with it. They still do.
But it was by no means a
one-way trade. Indeed the Arabs at one time made more
money by selling things to India than from the Indian
goods they took to Europe. They sold horses. They were
cheap in their own land, and in India they could be sold
for staggeringly high prices.
In India as elsewhere, the
horse was a symbol of power and prosperity. To be mounted
was to be superior; to own a horse was an attribute of
wealth, as well as of authority. But more than anything
else, a horse was also a tool of war, capable of
elevating a foot-soldier into a sowar a cavalryman
and of advancing a ranker to officer. Those were
turbulent times, and what we now call the rule of law was
unheard of; the country was in the grip of ceaseless
strife, and soldiering and brigandage were all but
synonymous.
These conditions
contributed not making the demand for horses all but
insatiable; the Arabs just could not bring enough of
them. This also meant that the horse-trade was a wholly
sellers market, and the Arabs were experts at
bargaining.
The sea route to India
from the Middle East had its normal hazards and
hardships; but the special cargo that these dhows carried
made every voyage an adventure. To take a horse on a sea
trip is just asking for trouble. Here a dozen or more
horses were somehow coaxed onto the heaving deck of a
frail ship and then kept confined in a stockade, all four
legs tethered tightly to the woodwork to prevent the
animals from kicking out and breaking themselves loose.
How these animals were fed
and watered, how prevented from going berserk with sheer
terror in stormy weather, their stands kept clean, is
difficult to imagine. For the ships company as well as
for her live cargo, these outward voyages must have been
like living through nightmares for the entire duration
four months or more.
Yet they came, these
Arabs, for they were tough men, known as much for their
spirit of adventure as for their appetites for profits,
and above all they were hard-nosed businessmen. Having
made the horse trade their monopoly, they were determined
not to allow their stanglehold on it to be loosened.
Their port of debarkation
was Govapuri, at the mouth of the Zuari river in Goa. In
ancient times and throughout the Middle Ages, Govapuri
was, by all accounts, a busy and prosperous port town.
But now all traces of it have vanished. It was to this
port that the kings and merchant princes and bandit
chiefs of Dravidian India sent their agents, with
moneybags stuffed with gold mohurs to buy horses.
Owing to the hardships and
privations of their voyages, these horses were in no
condition for further travel; as a rule they were
emaciated, wobbly on their legs and with gall-sores on
their bodies. They had to be rested and fattened up
before they could be marched off to their destinations,
and this meant that they had to be kept in Goa itself for
weeks if not months.
And this requirement
created a major problem, because the Goans themselves had
no idea of what a horse ate, let alone how to care for
ailing horses: and the Arabs, for their part, regarded
such information as a part of their trade secrets. So
jealous were they of guarding their monopoly of the
horse-trade that they had made it a rule never to bring
in a mare to India for fear that the Indians would take
to breeding horses in India itself. In the same manner,
how to feed a horse, or cure its everyday ailments, was
privileged information.
The Goans fumbling
efforts to learn how to fed the horses verge on the
ludicrous. They were used to feeding their cattle on
rice-straw. So, thinking, perhaps, that what the Arab
merchants themselves evinced a special fondness for in
Goa, mutton and ghee, they began to mix
mutton-stew and dollops of ghee in the rice-straw.
Finally, after a year or two, they had hit upon a formula
on which their charges seemed to do reasonably well:
local pulses and gram mixed with green vegetables to
which they added "the flowers of the raghi tree
mixed with common salt."
Then, towards the end of
the seventh century, Ventudeva, a dynamic king of Goa of
the Kadamba dynasty, did for the Arab stranglehold on
Indias horse-trade what Emperor Justinian had done
for the Chinese stranglehold on silk manufacture.
He resorted to sharp
practices.
Those were the days of
slavery and the Arabs who, after all, were at the
forefront of the slave trade, used to employ their slaves
for doing all the menial tasks of looking after their
horses during their voyages to India. These shipboard
slaves, were mainly from East Africa and they had been
converted to Islam after their capture. They certainly
knew just as much about the care and management of horses
as their Arab masters.
So Ventudeva arranged
through his agents to entice some of these slaves to
desert, on the promise that they would not only be set
free, but would be resettled on land, given jobs, and
even found wives for.
These escaped-slaves were
resettled in a colony of their own in Sattari, and as
Anant Dhume tells it: "were married to local
girls...and lived happily, and their descendants
continued there."
After that King Ventudeva
arranged to bring mares from indigenous breeds, mainly
from Kathiawad, and had them mated with Arab stallions,
thereby setting up a special breed of horses. Goa which,
for many years had been no more than a transit depot for
Arab horses, also had its own stud farms.
These revelations by Dhume
who made the study of Goas ancient past his mission
in life, challenge earlier assumptions that there were no
Muslims in India before 1000 A.D. and that the first
settlement of Muslims in the peninsular part of India did
not come till the twelfth century. In Goa they seem to
have been living since the seventh century.
|