|
Artistic
podiums of Haryanvi havelis
Architecture
By Ranbir
Singh
BEYOND the architectural beauty of
a traditional north Indian haveli, EYOND the
architectural beauty of a traditional there are many
individual aspects of its conservation that need to be
observed. A meticulous observer discovers that our desi
designers did some thought-provoking work while
fine-tuning the structures of the gates of document and
classify gate structures of havelis. Trying to
traditional Haryanvi havelis, one discovers that not only
are there variations in the layout, design and
workmanship but also an amazing array of subjects is
touched upon.
Take, for instance, the chauntary or
a podium. The need to create a pair of podiums at an
appropriate place under the vault of an arched gateway
was initially a structural requirement. A pair of pillars
was needed to bear the burden of the heavy material and
diffuse pressure on the ground, both vertically and
horizontally. The device worked, and, it became an
essential feature of the layout of havelis. To
understand the role of podiums vis-a-vis the structure,
one needs to actually see the structure of an arched gate
of a haveli built on traditional principles.
Havelis have
always imparted a medieval character and an aesthetically
pleasing looks to our alleys. Let us look deep at the
characteristics relating to folk art and aesthetics as
far as these havelis are concerned.
Podiums were found on
buildings used for residential, defence, religious and
court functions. These indicated the social status of the
owner of the building.
At
places, one can see podiums of various forms measuring
less than two feet in length to eight feet, horizontally.
In the local dialect, a podium is called a chauntary. Bigger
chauntaries were added only under a huge arch. A chauntary
has several parts and features. The top slab or sheersha
shila was always kept smooth on the top but its width
was equal to four fingers. This slab was corniced
beautifully only on the vaultside and face side. It was
firmly embedded and rectangularly placed on a brick
platform usually two to three feet high which was hidden
underneath. Since construction progresses from bottom to
top, the layout required meticulous workmanship at
several stages. From the bottom to the top of a chauntary
at least four slabs, three horizontal and two
vertical, were fixed by masons. Sometimes four, but
mostly two, frontal pillar posts to cover corners were
required to be fixed. These pillar posts or corner filler
stumps were not merely crude stones but figures of dwarpala,
i.e. a gate guard and dancing fairies were carved on
them. These can be seen on two havelis; one at
village Kharak Kalan and another at the ancient town of
Meham in Haryana. In Haryana, also elsewhere, names were
given to the parts and panels of a chauntary. The
form of a chauntary is suggestive of a seat but
only when its size is small. An increase in its size
would change it from a chauntary to a baranza i.e.,
a little verandah, in case it has more than one shoulder
pillar at the corner to support the lower end of the
vault. Double vaulted, high rise main gates have these baranzas.
At Jhajjar town, under
the vault of a century old haveli, there is a
double chauntary, i.e., a piggyback podium which
was perhaps a new experiment to retain the symmetry of
the level within the arch.
Different forms of figurative art depict
images as diverse as milking of a buffalo, a mounted
warrior on a steed, young women on a swing, an elephant
carrying a royal head in a sedan on its back, the symbol
of Om, a tantrik depiction of Brahma, dancing
peacock, flowers and flower vases, parrots on twigs with
flowers, wrestlers in action, demi-gods and even the Sun
God. This symbolic and figurative art was purposeful. In
India, the elephant is both a symbol of wealth and power;
a peacock is revered for its grace and beauty, parrots
are supposed to be auspicious and are patronised for
their intelligence, and Hanuman, the monkey god, is
revered for his exceptional strength and loyalty among
the Jats of Haryana. These figures constantly remind
people of their rich cultural heritage.
People who patronised
such art were indirectly also promoting art in stone,
chiselled brickwork and figures in choona i.e.,
lime mortar. The shilawats, or stone carvers, who
mostly inhabited stone markets in cities like Rohtak,
Bhiwani, Bahadurgarh, Sonepat and Rewari were the real
creators of this art. Large blocks of buff sandstone were
regularly brought from quarries in Rajasthan. These were
then cut into smaller pieces and chiselled to give a
shape. The shilawats then chiselled figures on
these. It is evident that they only carved figures of
auspicious animals, birds and human figures. They also,
in order to break the monotony of chiselling, expressed
themselves artistically. This creativity never dried up.
These shilawats were
held in esteem by their contemporaries. Such artisans are
rarely found these days and their work is almost defunct.
It is regrettable that
this art form not only declined in the 1950s due to
change in building styles but what little is left of it
is decaying fast due to the negligence of the owners of
the havelis. In the older times, the people had
felt the need to order masons to create ornate chauntaries
but now this Indian art form has given way to western
designs of gate structures, largely made of wrought iron
or brass.
|