Kakars Ascetic
of Desire
THE silliest and most unscientific
book on sex that I have ever read is Vatsayanas Kamasutra.
There is no basis whatsoever of his dividing men and
women into categories depending on the size of their
genitals. Vatsayanas categorisation of males into
hares, horses and bulls and women into gazelles, mares
and the elephants which was basic to his analysis of
man-woman physical relationship was entirely arbitrary.
So was his penchant for enumerating just about every
action that brought men and women closer to each other.
For him, the number 64 has some kind of mystic
significance. Following Manu, he listed transgressions of
caste code by the four Varnas totalling 64. How
seriously can anyone today accept this kind of treatise? Kamasutra
is not even good pornography, it is downright silly and
often hilarious. The one thing that can be said in its
favour is that it was compiled sometime around the 4th
century A.D. during the so-called Golden Age of the Gupta
Empire and gives the reader some idea of the free and
open society of those times. It was also the time when
erotic sculpture and painting flourished in different
parts of the country.
Not much is known about
the author of Kamasutra besides his name and that
he lived in Kausambi and Varanasi and had access to the
court of the ruling prince. Using extracts from his
treatise, Sudhir Kakar, Indias leading
psycho-analyst, has reconstructed his life and times. He
has done so with the consummate skill of a
master-craftsman using psycho-analytic techniques,
imagination and felicitous prose to bring to life a
scholar of ancient erotica who died over 1500 years ago.
He uses an ingenious device of getting a young neophyte
(obviously himself) who spends many days over many years
in Vatsayanas hermitage on the pretext of writing a
commentary on the Kamasutra. He questions
Vatsayana on contentious points like the art of
seduction, foreplay etc.
If Kakar is right,
Vatsayana was an illegitimate child of a wealthy
tradesman and brought up in an establishment of
courtesans run by two sisters, one of whom was his
fathers mistress. Young Vatsayana became a
favourite of his mausi (aunt). He saw the comings
and goings of rich patrons, who came to see the girls
sing and dance. After schooling in a gurukul he
gained access to the rulers court and was granted a
stipend to compile a definitive work on erotic arts. He
was married off to the rulers beautiful but wayward
sister-in-law many years younger than him. They retired
to a hermitage at the fringe of a forest. While the
Acharya was busy writing or meditating, his wife loitered
around in the jungle watching birds and beasts and
contemplated on life by a lily pond. On this sylvan scene
arrived a young man to compile a biography of the Acharya
and clarify some points of his magnum opus. After
their mid-day meal when the Acharya was resting, the
young student followed his gurus wife into the
forest. They became lovers. One day the Acharya came upon
them and caught them. He said nothing but disappeared for
ever. The young lovers fled the hermitage and the town,
because an extramarital relationship between a shishya
and the gurus wife was regarded the gravest of
sins. They had an illegitimate child. In short, the
author of the Hindu classic on sex, Kamasutra, was
himself impotent.
Not many people take Kamasutra
seriously. Sudhir Kakars fictionalised biography of
its author The Ascetic of Desire (Viking-Penguin)
is a serious work which makes fascinating reading.
Scientists
reject God
There are organisations in
America and England which periodically carry out surveys
among the scientific community regarding belief in the
existence of God. The pioneer of this investigation was
an American psychologist James H. Leuba. His first survey
was carried out in 1914. He divided scientists in
"greater" and the common run. Even more than
half a century ago more than half of the 1000 scientists
questioned, expressed disbelief in God; the figure of
disbelievers rose to 70 per cent among
"greater" scientists. During a second survey
carried out in 1933, the ratio of non-believers had risen
67 per cent among "lesser" and 85 per cent
among "greater" scientists. The last survey
carried out this year shows that the scientists community
is near unanimous in rejecting the concept of God.
The division of scientists
into "greater" and "others" is not
arbitrary. In the "greater" category are
pioneers in different fields of scientific research and
members of top institutions like the National Academy of
Sciences. Among them biologists, physicists, astronomers
(believers in astrology take note) have the least belief
in God and life hereafter. Mathematicians are more
cautious and prefer to be in the dont-know agnostic
category than positive rejectors.
I wish some organisation
would carry not similar surveys in the Indian scientific
community. The few Indian scientists I met believed in
silly things like astrology and palmistry. I did not take
them seriously. Nor did the world scientific community.
Confession
Magistrate to the accused
person in the dock: "Whatever you say shall be held
against you."
Accused: "Hema
Malini".
(Contributed by A.V.
Menon, Bangalore)
Love
madness
Sardarni Banta Singh was
down with high fever. She became emotional and
asked," Sardarji what will you do if I die?"
Banta replied instantly, "Ill go mad."
The very relieved wife
again asked; "You will not re-marry after I am
gone."
"I told you I will go
mad," he replied, "And mad people do mad
things."
Catchy
signs
Discovered written on a
Maruti van in Mumbai: "If ignorance is really bliss,
why arent most of us happy?"
A sticker on a Tata Sumo
in Meerut: "Cost of living under BJP government
Income plus 20 per cent!"
A graffito on a trendy
"Maruti 800" in New Mumbai: "It took a lot
of will power, but finally Ive given up trying to
give up smoking!"
Seen scribbled on an Opel
Astra in Delhi, "Men who plan to seek God at the
11th hour, die at 10.59!"
Notice in a Mumbai hotel:
"The manager has personally passed all the water
served here!"(Contributed by Shashank Shekhar, New
Mumbai)
|