'Killer'
Khan
If
the charge of poaching black bucks is proved in the court
of law, Salman will have to undergo a minimum
imprisonment of one year. Along with the jail term, he
may also be ordered to pay a heavy fine, says Milap
Chand Dandia
WHEN the entire nation was
celebrating Wildlife Protection Week, film stars from
Bollywood were busy indiscriminately killing innocent
animals in Rajasthan. For days together, after a hectic
shooting schedule at the sets of Rajshri Pictures film Hum
Saath Saath Hain at Jodhpur, these top heroes and
heroines used to whisk away in the jungles near the town
in the dark everyday with guns and kill black bucks,
chinkaras and peacocks. The prey were then brought to a
local hotel which cooked tasty dishes with their meat for
the stars. All this went on for several days, but the fun
came to an abrupt halt on Gandhi Jayanti, October 2.
Encouraged with the
poaching of chinkaras and peacocks for several days, the
hunters decided to savour black bucks, too. On October 1,
with the assistance of the manager of the travel agency
run by Maharaja Gaj Singh of Jodhpur, the film stars went
to Gudha Bishnoian and shot two black bucks. As the black
bucks fell on the ground writhing in pain, Salman got out
of his Gypsy to halal the animals with the help of
the big knife he had brought along with him. Hearing the
gunshots villagers came running out of their houses only
to find the helpless black bucks dying. Seeing the
villagers the film stars fled from the village in their
Gypsy leaving the bucks behind. But the villagers
recognised Salman and after a chase on a motor cycle
noted the number of their Gypsy.
Next day, the villagers
reported the incident to forest officials and filed a
written complaint naming Salman Khan as the poacher and
giving the number of the Gypsy.
On the basis of the
complaint forest officials reached Gudha Bishnoian and
seized the dead black bucks. They were also shown the
stone which was used for the halal of the black
bucks. A veterinary surgeon, Dr Narain Prasad Nepalia,
was summoned and asked to conduct a post-mortem on the
dead animals. The skin of the killed bucks was taken out
and preserved in the forest office.
The Gypsy mentioned in the
First Information Report was also subsequently seized.
The interrogation of the driver confirmed that on the
night the bucks were killed Salman was not alone. He was
accompanied in the Gypsy by, besides a local guide, film
stars Saif Ali, Tabu, Sonali Bendre and Neelam Kothari.
On inspection of the vehicle the forest officials came to
the conclusion that it was earlier used to ferry dead
chinkaras. A subsequent enquiry revealed that Salman Khan
had hunted chinkaras, too, on September 26 and 28 in
Mathania. Satish Shah was also with Salman on the night
of October 2.
Black bucks are considered
as holy animals by the Bishnois and for them there
cant be a bigger sin than killing the sacred
animal. So when they doubted that the investigation was
not proceeding with the desired speed, they started a dharna
in Jodhpur, demanding the arrest of the culprits.
Finally, forest officials took Salman Khan, Saif Ali,
Tabu, Sonali Bendre and Neelam into custody from the sets
of the film Hum Saath Saath Hain at Mandore
Gardens on October 9.
Whatever turned out after
the grilling of the stars for about seven hours led the
forest officials to believe that Salman Khan was the main
accused. Just as the officials were to formally arrest
the stars, Salman Khan and Saif Ali obtained interim bail
till October 12 from the court. They were released but
the film actresses were arrested and produced before a
magistrate in the night itself. They were released on
bail.
On October 12, however,
the magistrate rejected Salmans application for
anticipatory bail and he was, therefore, arrested by the
forest officials in the afternoon.
On October 13,
Salmans counsel pleaded before the magistrate that
he was innocent and was being falsely implicated for
political reasons. Their argument was that the brother of
Forest Minister Jaswant Singh Bishnoi was present during
the initial interrogation by forest officials on October
9. But the incident started getting a communal colour
outside the court room where thousands of people had
gathered. A section of the crowd intermittently raised
the slogan Hernon ke hatyaron ko phansi do (Hang
the killers of black bucks), which was instantly replied
by full-throated slogans of Salman Khan zindabad
by another section of the crowd, comprising a particular
community.
Bishnois staged a dharna
outside the court premises, demanding stern punishment to
the culprits as the accused had hurt their religious
sentiments. On October 14, however, some
loudspeaker-fitted vehicles made rounds in the Muslim
locality, announcing that Salman was in difficulty and
his brother wants to address the local Muslims to get
their support for the film star. The Muslims were urged
to assemble at the stadium grounds to hear Salmans
brother. People started gathering at the announced venue
but the local police swiftly swung into action and
dispersed the crowd. The feeling amongst some Muslims is
that the Salman case is being blown out of proportion
because the state has a BJP government. Salmans
brother Sohail also charged that his brother was a victim
of politics, but he did not specify any person or party.
On a
request of forest officials the court remanded Salman in
their custody for three days so that the arms used in the
crime could be recovered from him. In the meantime, the
arms used in hunting were sent back to Bombay by Salman.
The Forest Department, therefore, despatched a team of
officials for their recovery. Seeing no way out Salman
preferred to get back the arms himself. His men handed
over one revolver and one .22 gun to the forest
officials team, while it was half way to Bombay at
Mt Abu. Two days later Salmans farmhouse at Panvel
was raided by forest officials of Bombay, who recovered
from there two guns, one Mouser, one Magnum and a one
12-bore gun. The raiding party also discovered two live
chinkaras, one black buck and one peacock, which are
enlisted as protected animals and birds in Schedule I of
the Protection of Wildlife Act. The arms seized from the
Panvel farmhouse were in custody of Salmans family
without any licence from appropriate authority.
While Salman was
constantly pleading his innocence his supporters were
trying to destroy the evidence outside. They managed to
get an imaginary post-mortem report from the government
vet, Dr Narain Prasad Nepalia, saying that the black
bucks died of overeating and dog bites. The report,
however, did not match with the skins of the black bucks
preserved in the Forest Department. Sensing manipulation
the Forest Department ordered a fresh autopsy by a board
of vets. The board got the carcass taken out from the
grave, and after a thorough examination reported that
both the bucks had marks of bullet shots. The department
not only immediately suspended Dr Nepalia after receiving
the second post-mortem report but also got a case
registered against him for giving a false post-mortem
report.
After the surrender of
arms by Salman, the court released him on bail on October
15, only to be arrested again, this time by the police,
on the charge of killing chinkaras and peacocks in
Mathania on September 26 and 28. After remaining in
police lock-up for 24 hours, Salman was remanded in
judicial custody by the court till October 26.
The ordeal for Salman,
however, ended on October 17 when the District and
Sessions Judge ordered his release on bail on the
condition that he furnished a bail bond worth Rs 1 lakh,
and ordered him to surrender his passport within a week
to the police. Immediately after getting bail, Salman
took a flight to Bombay.
Salman might have got a
reprieve from the ordeal in Jodhpur but his woes do not
appear to be over. The recovery of unlicensed arms and
live protected animals from his farmhouse in Bombay may
land him in more trouble.
At one stage it appeared as if the entire
case of killing innocent animals might be hushed up as
top stars of the filmdom were involved, who had the
capacity to influence investigation. Taking no chance
Chief Minister Bhairon Singh Shekhawat in his own
inimitable style called a high-level meeting on October
11 at the secretariat to take stock of the situation.
The meeting, besides
others, was attended by Chief Secretary Arun Kumar,
Additional Chief and Principal Home Secretary VN Bahadur,
DG Police Amitabh Gupta, Forest Secretary Alka Kala, Law
Secretary SK Garg and Chief Wildlife Warden RG Soni.
After thorough
deliberations he ordered a team of four top-ranking
officials comprising Inspector-General of Police (Crime)
Namo Narain Meena, Chief Wildlife Warden RG Soni, DIG
Sudhir Pratap Singh and an expert from the forensic lab
to immediately proceed to Jodhpur. This team camped at
Jodhpur to oversee and guide the entire process of
investigation and court proceedings. As a result the
investigation, which once appeared going haywire, was
again put on the right track.
This is not the first time
that Shekhawat has shown keen interest in the protection
of wildlife. Wildlife lovers vividly remember his role in
stopping the indiscriminate shooting of the great Indian
bustard in the sand dunes of Jaisalmer by Arab Sheikhs.
Shekhawat was then, too, the CM of the state, and the
present PM, Atal Behari Vajpayee, was the Foreign
Minister. Vajpayee advised Shekhawat to proceed
cautiously as stopping Sheikhs from hunting in Indian
territory may adversely affect the countrys
relations with Arab countries. But Shekhawat refused to
permit hunting of innocent birds, which were already on
the verge of extinction. Meanwhile, a massive public
protest came forth. Unmindful of indirect suggestions
from the Foreign Minister, Shekhawat forced the Sheikhs
to pack up and leave Jaisalmer without having the fun of
shooting the birds.
Salman Khan might have
given many shots in various films depicting court scenes
and jail life. But he had the first encounter with real
life courts and jails in Jodhpur. Between October 12 and
17 he had the experience of forest custody, police
lock-up and a jail cell. For his custody the Rasala Road
office of the District Forest Officer was turned into a
jail where Salman was provided a cot, a bedding and a
room cooler. Though the comforts provided to him there
were no match to the ones available at Ummed Bhavan
Palace, his only complaint was about mosquitoes.
After his release from custody Salman was
arrested by the police and lodged at the Basni police
station. After intense interrogation till after midnight
Salman was allowed to rest and was provided an iron cot
and a durrie to sleep in the lock-up.
In jail he was put in a
cell along with a convict officer (a lifer who has
completed two-thirds of his jail term). He had to sleep
on the floor. Only one durrie and a blanket was
provided by the jail authorities but there was no bedding
nor pillow. He was, however, permitted to get his own
bedcover as permitted under the jail manual.
If the charge of poaching
black bucks is proved in the court of law, Salman will
have to undergo a minimum imprisonment of one year. Along
with the jail term he may also be ordered to pay a heavy
fine.
Section 51 of the
Protection of Wildlife Act of 1972 says that any body
found guilty of killing rare and endangered species of
wildlife enlisted in Schedule I and II, will be liable to
imprisonment up to six years but not less than one year.
The punishment may also attract a fine up to Rs 25,000
but not less than Rs 50,000.
Black bucks, chinkara,
tigers etc are all enlisted in Schedule-I of the
Protection of Wildlife Act.
|