SC notice to anti-graft panel on govt plea : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

SC notice to anti-graft panel on govt plea

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Jammu and Kashmir State Accountability Commission (SAC) on the state government’s appeal challenging the anti-graft body’s ‘suo motu’ powers to look into complaints against public functionaries, including ministers and legislators, in graft cases.



New Delhi, April 20

The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Jammu and Kashmir State Accountability Commission (SAC) on the state government’s appeal challenging the anti-graft body’s ‘suo motu’ powers to look into complaints against public functionaries, including ministers and legislators, in graft cases.

A bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra sought the response from the anti-graft body on the plea filed by the Jammu and Kashmir Government against a High Court verdict restoring the SAC’s powers to take up such cases on its own.

The bench, also comprising Justice AM Khanwilkar and Justice DY Chandrachud, considered the submission of advocate Shoeb Alam, counsel for the state government, while condoning the delay in filing of the appeal and listed it for hearing on April 27.

The state government, in its plea, said the commission’s power of suo motu initiation of proceedings against a public functionary was “bad in law”.

“The Accountability Commission has, by virtue of Rule 9 of the Jammu and Kashmir Accountability Commission Regulations, 2005, clothed itself with the power to initiate suo motu action when there is no substantive provision under the Act vesting such a power in the Accountability Commission. Rule 9 is ultra vires the Act and all proceedings initiated in pursuance thereof are without any jurisdiction,” the appeal said.

A division bench of the High Court had set aside the judgement of a single judge bench and restored the panel’s powers of initiating suo motu proceedings against any minister, legislator or people’s representative on the basis of anonymous complaints or media reports.

The division bench had said that striking down of Rule 9 by the single judge bench had not denuded the SAC of its power of suo motu initiation of proceedings against a public functionary and that power was still intact. — PTI

Top News

‘Congress mantra is loot in life, loot after life’: PM Modi on Sam Pitroda’s inheritance tax remarks

‘Congress mantra is loot in life, loot after life’: PM Modi on Sam Pitroda’s 'inheritance tax' remarks

Grand Old Party accuses BJP of distorting Pitroda’s remarks ...

Union minister Nitin Gadkari faints while speaking at campaign rally in Maharashtra

Union minister Nitin Gadkari faints while speaking at campaign rally in Maharashtra

Gadkari, however, recovered after a few minutes and complete...

Lok Sabha election: Campaigning ends for 89 seats going to polls in second phase on April 26

Lok Sabha election: Campaigning ends for 89 seats going to polls in second phase on April 26

Among the prominent contestants are Union Minister Rajeev Ch...


Cities

View All