Shoe store gets SDM notice for not passing on GST benefit to customer : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

Shoe store gets SDM notice for not passing on GST benefit to customer

CHANDIGARH: Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Central) Virat has issued summons to the owner of a footwear store for not passing on the benefit of the reduction of Goods and Services Tax (GST) to a consumer under the anti-profiting rules.

Shoe store gets SDM notice for not passing on GST benefit to customer


Ramkrishan Upadhyay

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, January 13

Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Central) Virat has issued summons to the owner of a footwear store for not passing on the benefit of the reduction of Goods and Services Tax (GST) to a consumer under the anti-profiting rules.

The notice has been issued for January 15 for violating an order passed by District Magistrate (DM) Ajit Balaji Joshi under Section 144 of the CrPC banning the sale of products without passing on the tax reduction benefits to the consumers under law.

The Centre had issued the anti-profiting notification in November last year.

Chandigarh was the first in the country where the DM issued an order under Section 144 for ensuring the compliance of the notification.

Sources said the notice had been issued on a complaint filed by an advocate, Ajay Jagga, against Metro Shoes Limited, Sector 17. In the compliant, Jagga sought punishment for the firm under Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for violation/disobedience of the prohibitory orders issued by the DM by passing on the benefit to him.

Jagga stated that he had purchased a shoe polish (MRP Rs 99) from the shop on December 20 last year. He said he was charged 28 per cent GST on the item even as the levy on the product was reduced to 18 per cent. Jagga said the GST Council, in its meeting held in Guwahati on 10 November last year, had reduced the tax on the product and it was notified by the government. He said instead of charging Rs 91.26 (after reduction of the tax), the shop owner took Rs 99 from him. The extra amount he was made to pay was illegal.

Under the Section 188, violation of Section 144 invites a punishment of simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month or with a fine which may extend to Rs 200 or with both.

Top News

US sanctions Chinese suppliers for providing critical components of Pakistan’s ballistic missile programme

US sanctions Chinese suppliers for providing critical components of Pakistan’s ballistic missile programme

As a result of the action, all property and interests in pro...

Iraq's popular mobilization forces post hit in air strike, sources say

Iraq's popular mobilization forces post hit in air strike, sources say

US official said there had been no US military activity in I...

Indian student's death in US possibly linked to 'Blue Whale Challenge': Report

Indian student's death in US possibly linked to 'Blue Whale Challenge': Report

The 20-year-old, who will remain unnamed here in deference t...

Tesla's Elon Musk postpones India trip, sources say

Elon Musk postpones India visit, cites ‘very heavy’ Tesla obligations

The Tesla CEO wrote on X that he is looking forward to comin...


Cities

View All