NEW DELHI: The anti-corruption Lokpal Bill was tabled in the Rajya Sabha today in an amended form but its consideration was thwarted by Samajwadi Party, an outside supporter of the UPA government, which disrupted proceedings.

The government brought the Bill against the backdrop of a stunning performance by Aam Aadmi Party in Delhi Assembly elections over the plank of the Lokpal and the ongoing fast of Anna Hazare over the issue.

The amended Bill delinks setting up of Lokayuktas in states, a highly controversial provision because of which many parties had opposed it in the House in December last year.

The new Bill also grants powers to ombudsman to sanction prosecution against public servants.

As Minister of State for Personnel V. Narayanasamy moved the amended Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill, 2011, and started speaking on it, Samajwadi Party members trooped into the Well and raised slogans.

SP, which provides outside support to the UPA government, maintained that it will not support the legislation in the current form fearing it would lead to "police raj".

However, in the House, the SP members disrupted proceedings by demanding a discussion on the issue of price rise, saying it is an issue of public importance that needs to be addressed first.

TDP members, meanwhile, kept shouting slogans against division of Andhra Pradesh and creation of Telangana state.

Soon after the House met at noon and Narayanasamy sought cooperation of the House in passage of the bill, BJP Deputy Leader Ravi Shankar Prasad said a discussion on the issue of price rise could be taken up on Monday.

Deputy Chairman P.J. Kurien said the House has agreed for a discussion on the Bill and the Minister has started speaking, but SP and TDP members continued to create ruckus.

The Upper House could not function properly because of the din and saw three adjournments till 3.30 PM before being adjourned for the day. — Agencies

RALEGAN SIDDHI: Differences between Anna Hazare and Aam Aadmi Party came to fore on Friday when its leader Gopal Rai tried to interrupt General V.K. Singh's speech at the venue and was rebuffed by Anna Hazare who has been on indefinite hunger strike for passage in Parliament of Jan Lokpal Bill.

"Why are you interrupting him? If you want to create a ruckus, you can go out," Hazare told Rai.

"It is not right to interrupt when someone is speaking," he added.

Hazare publicly rebuked Rai, asking him to leave the venue if he went ahead with disrupting the former Army Chief's speech.

Singh, who was sharing stage with Hazare, said, "We should not split and form different groups in our fight against corruption."

The AAP leader raised some objections, which led to a heated argument between him and Gen Singh, following which the septuagenarian asked Rai to immediately leave the village.

"We have not asked you to fast, if you want to create such noise then you can leave Ralegan Siddhi," Hazare told the AAP member.

The anti-graft crusader, whose fast entered the fourth day on Friday, has parked himself near the Yadav Baba temple at Ralegan Siddhi village in Maharashtra's Ahmednagar district, under the banner of 'Jantantra Morcha'.

The 76-year-old Gandhian said he will not break his fast till the Jan Lokpal Bill is passed in Parliament. — PTI

Fodder scam case: SC grants bail to Lalu Prasad

NEW DELHI: In a relief to Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Lalu Prasad, the Supreme Court on Friday granted him bail in a fodder scam case.

Lalu Prasad was awarded five years’ imprisonment by the special Ranchi court for his alleged involvement in the fodder scam.

There were 44 accused in the case and 37 of them have already been granted bail and bail application of six others is under consideration of the trial court.

The apex court bench headed by Chief Justice P. Sathasivam and Justice Ranjan Gogoi, while granting bail to Lalu, noted that similarly situated other accused too have already been granted bail.

The court noted that out of five years’ jail awarded to Lalu, he has already undergone one year of the sentence in two phases, which included incarceration for 10 months during the course of trial and another two months since he was convicted and sentenced to jail. — IANS

Indian diplomat in NY arrested for visa fraud 

NEW YORK: India's deputy consul general in New York was arrested by law enforcement authorities on charges of visa fraud but was released on a $250,000-bond after she pleaded not guilty in a court. 

Devyani Khobragade, 39, was taken into custody on Thursday after India-born US attorney for the southern district of New York Preet Bharara announced charges of visa fraud against her and alleged that she had made false statements in connection with the visa application of an Indian national employed by her as a babysitter and housekeeper.

Khobragade was also serving as the acting consul general at the Consulate General of India in New York at the time of her arrest.

She was charged with one count of visa fraud and one count of making false statements, which carry maximum sentences of 10 years and five years in prison, respectively.

Khobragade, mother of two daughters and a Chevening scholar, was taken into custody and produced before judge Debra Freeman late in the afternoon for an arraignment hearing.

The judge read out Khobragade her rights and the charges against her. Khobragade did not speak during the hearing except to say that she agrees with the terms and conditions of the bail. The next hearing has been set for January 13.

Wearing a purple sweater and dress, Khobragade appeared composed during the hearing but looked pale and stressed.

Khobragade submitted her diplomatic passport to the court. Freeman ordered that Khobragade cannot leave the country but can travel within the US only if she gives advance notification of her travels.

Her lawyer told the judge that his client is "not subject to prosecution" as she "enjoys immunity as a consulate officer". Her lawyer will be filing claims of diplomatic immunity in the case and relevant papers in court.

Announcing the charges against Khobragade, Bharara said, "Foreign nationals brought to the United States to serve as domestic workers are entitled to the same protections against exploitation as those afforded to United States citizens.

"The false statements and fraud alleged to have occurred here were designed to circumvent those protections so that a visa would issue for a domestic worker who was promised far less than a fair wage. This type of fraud on the United States and exploitation of an individual will not be tolerated."

Eminent Indian-American lawyer Ravi Batra said Bharara has "acted, as always, to defend the United States, while acknowledging that Constitutional presumptive innocence belongs to the accused."

"Absent the creation of a new legal category for diplomatic foreign domestic workers, which exempts them from US labor laws, including, wages and hours, American laws must be followed to avoid both criminal and civil liability as well as diaspora and foreign-sovereign embarrassment.

"Foreign nations who pay their workers at or near US labour rates are free from this risk, however of 194 countries, most nations are below US-mandated hours and wage standards, and to this later group's diplomatic corps - they remain at high risk to be in the cross-hairs of illegality and reputation-suicide," Batra said.

The Indian embassy in Washington released a statement saying it had "immediately conveyed its strong concern" to the US Government on action taken against Khobragade.

"The US side have been urged to resolve the matter with due sensitivity, taking into account... the diplomatic status of the officer concerned," the embassy said in the statement.

The embassy said it had been informed that Khobragade was taken into custody by law enforcement authorities.

It added that the action was apparently taken against Khobragade on the basis of allegations raised by the officer's former India-based domestic assistant, Sangeeta Richard, who is absconding since June this year.

In this context the Delhi high court had issued an-interim injunction in September to restrain Richard from instituting any actions or proceedings against Khobragade outside India on the terms or conditions of her employment.

"The US government had subsequently been requested to locate Richard and facilitate the service of an arrest warrant, issued by the metropolitan magistrate of the South District court in New Delhi under Sections 387, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code," the embassy said, adding that the existing court case in India against Richard has already been brought to the attention of the US government.

An 11-page criminal complaint unsealed in Manhattan federal court alleged Khobragade had made false statements about the salary and employment terms of the domestic help she had got from India. The complaint, however, did not name Richard.

Diplomats and consular officers can get domestic workers, personal employees and servants on A-3 visas. The diplomats have to submit proof that the helper will receive a fair wage, sufficient to support himself financially, comparable to that being offered in the area of employment in the US.

The complaint alleged that Khobragade prepared and electronically submitted an application for an A-3 visa for the Indian national who was to be her personal employee beginning in November 2012 in New York.

The visa application stated that the domestic help would to be paid $4,500 per month. Khobragade and the domestic help also signed an employment contract which stated that she would pay her the prevailing or minimum wage, whichever is greater, resulting in an hourly salary of $9.75.

The complaint said that Khobragade knew that the employment contract that she caused her domestic help to submit to the US state department contained "materially false and fraudulent statements about hourly wage and hours worked."

Prior to the signing of the contract, it was agreed between Khobragade and her domestic help that she would be paid Rs 30,000 per month. At 40 hours per week, it was equivalent to $573.07 monthly or $3.31 per hour.

However, Khobragade instructed the help to say that she would be paid $9.75 per hour, and not to say anything about being paid Rs 30,000 per month. Khobragade also instructed the help to say that she would work 40 hours per week.

After the employment contract was submitted to the US department of state, Khobragade allegedly told her domestic help that she needed to sign another employment contract which provided that the domestic help's maximum salary per month including overtime allowance will not exceed Rs. 30,000 per month. The second employment contract did not contain any provision about the normal number of working hours per week.

The domestic help worked for Khobragade as a household employee from November 2012 through June 2013. The complaint said that regardless of the terms of the first employment contract, she worked far more than 40 hours per week and was paid less than $9.75 per hour by Khobragade.

Suneeta Dewan, an attorney present at the hearing, said Khorbragade had employed the domestic help in her personal capacity and not diplomatic capacity. This is why the reason of diplomatic immunity may not apply in the case.

Two officials from the consulate were also present during the hearing.

As she walked out of the courtroom after the hearing, Khobragade smiled and hugged a couple of her friends who had come for the hearing.

She told PTI that she cannot talk to the press since the matter is "subjudice" but said that she is doing fine. She was flanked by her attorney Daniel Arshack and her colleagues from the consulate who escorted her outside the court.

Dewan, a friend of Khorbragade who was among the first people she had called following the arrest, said it was "very unfortunate" that she was arrested.

"She is a very fine person, accomplished and hardworking."

Khobragade joined the consulate last year and was previously posted in Germany, Italy and Pakistan.

The arrest sent shock wave among the Indian diplomatic corps and some officers said it is unprecedented and inappropriate for a diplomat to be arrested. — PTI

DHAKA: The execution of Jamaat-e-Islami leader in Bangladesh has sparked violent protests.

TV stations reported on Friday that activists torched many homes and shops belonging to Hindus.

The Jamaat leader, Abdul Quader Mollah, was hanged on Thursday night for war crimes committed during Bangladesh’s war of independence in 1971. His brother, Mainuddin Mollah, said he was buried early on Friday in his ancestral home of Faridpur.

Mollah had a key role in, an ally of the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party.

The case has exposed the explosive political tensions in Bangladesh between the ruling party and the opposition ahead of national elections next month. — AP