|
|
M A I
N N E W S |
If you look at
other coalitions, NC and Cong
are better off: Omar
Just before the government
wound down in Jammu and began shifting to Srinagar, Chief Minister
Omar Abdullah spoke exclusively to Editor-in-Chief Raj
Chengappa and Resident Editor Arun Joshi
on a range of key issues. Excerpts:
What has been the impact of Afzal
Guru’s hanging in Kashmir?
Chief Minister Omar
Abdullah |
Let us not underestimate the impact it has had on people’s
psyche. Their suspicions are being proved correct in the way in which
you handled his execution as opposed to others. Start with the
Veerappan gang members, their mercy petition was rejected by the
President and after that they got a stay on the execution by the
Supreme Court.
People in Kashmir want to know why Afzal Guru did not have that
option. Why is it that suddenly we have woken up to the need to inform
families? How is it that the execution of people involved in heinous
terrorists attacks is today on hold? That is what people are
suspicious about in Kashmir. People will naturally ask me that if the
Chief Minister of Punjab can have an execution delayed then why
couldn’t I.
I need to have an answer and did not have any answer and it’s a
fact. If you have a death penalty don’t use it selectively and
politically. There can be only one yardstick for measuring and that
has to be judicial. The moment you start measuring these things by the
political yardstick, then you have all sorts of trouble and that is
exactly what is happening in Kashmir right now.
How are your relations with your coalition partner Congress in
the state given the daily rumblings?
Let us not
underestimate the impact the Afzal Guru hanging has had on
people’s psyche. Their suspicions are being proved correct in
the way in which you handled his execution as opposed to others
|
If you look at the other coalitions, I think ours is a lot
smoother. Whether it’s the Central coalition in the government or
the Opposition, there is a lot more head banging there. The NDA is not
even in power but they cannot agree with each other. God knows what
will happen to them if they come to power. As compared to that, I
think we are better off.
In the past four and a half years that you have been Chief
Minister, what would you say are the major achievements of your
government?
In terms of putting structures into place, definitely (one of the
achievements is) being able to have panchayat elections in the first
phase. We can take some satisfaction from that and from some of the
measures put in place to improve the quality of governance like the
Public Services Guarantee Act and the Result Framework Document that
we brought into the secretariat to improve the delivery of the
government services… that is an important achievement and so is the
creation of important institutions like the Vigilance Commission and
the Accountability Commission. What we have done in terms of using
some of our potential for power generation is that we have entered
into joint ventures with the NHPC (National Hydroelectric Power
Corporation) and our own state Power Development Corporation. Earlier
we did not add so much to power generation for the state as we are
doing now in terms of tendering out power projects of small, medium
and large sizes. So, these are also some of the achievements from
which we can take satisfaction.
It is creditable that panchayat elections were held, but there
are complaints that they are not fully empowered as yet.
As of now, they are fully empowered and it is for them to use the
powers that they have. Just as you can take a horse to the water but
you cannot force it to drink the water, likewise I can give them
powers but I cannot force them to use those powers. We have given
panchayats powers for 14 departments. The problem arises when panches
and sarpanches weigh their powers against financial terms. They are
taking these powers like how many new roads they can get constructed,
how many streets they can make, how many electricity poles they can
get installed and so on. Everything cannot be attached to monetary
powers. Panchayats are responsible for ensuring attendance in primary
schools, functioning of ration depots, they are responsible for the
mid-day meal scheme, the nutrition programme, attendance in anganwari
centres… these are not powers that you can attach monetary value to.
Are they being done? Are they calling the village-level committees?
Are the sarpanches carrying the panches with them? There are numerous
complaints from panches that sarpanches and Block Development Officers
are sitting and finalising plans and schemes without consulting the
people on the ground. If they are not carrying the panches with them
then how is the government responsible for this?
Why have the block-level elections been delayed?
We have hit a few problems there, there is no doubt about that,
more because we had reservation for panches and we had no reservation
at the sarpanches’ level, there was no reservation for women, the
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes. There was demand for
reservation, which is why the elections had to be postponed. If you do
not have reservation for the Scheduled Tribes at the Assembly level,
how can you give them reservation at the block level? So, in giving
reservation, there are operational difficulties, who should be given
reservation and who should not be. But for this demand, I would have
completed the block-level elections by now.
Sarpanches face threat to their life, many of them have been
killed. How can they be protected?
We are going in for
a two-fold approach (to tackle safety of panches): first, those
who face higher than usual threat perception will get
protection; second and more importantly, area domination is the
only way we can protect all of them
|
It remains a cause for concern for all of us. I cannot, it is a
fact, provide individual protection to each one because there are tens
of thousands of elected representatives. So, what we are going in for
a two-fold approach: first, those who face higher than usual threat
perception will get protection; second and more importantly, area
domination is the only way we can protect all of them.
But this suffers when there is a law and order disturbance to deal
with. When there is law and order problem, I have to withdraw the J
and K Police and CRPF personnel from the counter-insurgency duty,
resulting in weakening of my counter-insurgency grid. And these people
become an easier target for terrorist groups. The weakening of the
counter-insurgency grid means weakening of the area domination. So,
the moment the law and order situation eases, I am able to restore the
security personnel back to the counter-insurgency grid and the threat
to these people reduces. This is a man-managed issue which I have to
deal with. As I said, we are focusing on area domination and to a
large extent it has delivered the results.
Accountability and corruption remain concerns in Jammu and
Kashmir. What have you done to clean things up?
We have created
institutions to fight the menace of corruption. People can use
the Right to Information Act to seek any information on
corruption and they can file a case with the Accountability
Commission. If there is corruption, use these institutions. I
will do whatever I can do
|
You cannot quantify it. We have created institutions to fight the
menace of corruption. But to perceive corruption is one thing and to
be able to prove it is another. I will give you a small example —
the recent spurious drugs scandal. We proceeded in the matter and
arrests have been made and officials have been charge-sheeted. There
is no question of protecting any minister. There is not a single
document anybody can show to me that the minister has signed and said
that these drugs must be purchased. People can use the Right to
Information Act to seek any information on corruption and they can
file a case with the Accountability Commission. If there is
corruption, use these institutions. I will do whatever I can do.
What is your assessment of the Hurriyat now?
Their ability to attract support largely depends on how well we
perform and how badly we handle any situation. If we make a mistake,
they gain traction. If we keep things on an even keel and everything
goes all right, their ability to gain traction reduces. I will not say
that they are marginalised. There will always be a section of society
they represent; how large their constituency is, as I said, depends
largely on how badly we do these things. When we mess up really badly,
their constituencies grow; when things normalise, people are earning,
things are going well, their constituencies shrink a bit — that’s
the nature of the beast.
Your relations with the key opposition party, the PDP, have
deteriorated considerably.
There were never any (relations) and it takes two hands to clap.
Both in the Opposition and in the government, I have in the beginning
always gone the extra mile to build a relationship. They have always
had a jaundiced view towards the National Conference and they can’t
seem to escape that. So after a while one gets fed up of making an
attempt. When they did not want to come to the Assembly, I did not
force them and they did not stop us from functioning. Yes, it made the
Assembly a little less colourful, but it didn’t stop our work.
You raised the issue of Kashmir’s accession to India in the
Assembly recently. Why?
No, I did not; everything has a context. In the course of the
debate that was taking place on the grants of my departments, a couple
of members of the Assembly kept harping on how Jammu & Kashmir was
an integral part of the India. So when the time came to reply, I just
stood up and said, ‘Look, do you have any doubts because we have not
expressed any doubts from this side, so why do you feel the need to
constantly harp on it’. The fact is that this is an agreement that
was made between Jammu & Kashmir and the rest of India. While one
side of the agreement has been strengthened which is Jammu &
Kashmir is a part of India but the terms on which the relationship is
cemented has gradually been diluted. I think the people should be
complimented that despite the weakening of the terms, the actual bond
has remained strong. I did not raise the accession issue, I just put
things into a context.
Are you looking for good tourism this season?
It’s picking up. Obviously, we took a bit of a hit because of the
execution and the attack in Bemina; things are now picking up.
|