SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY |
Computer puts human supremacy in jeopardy Charging, the wireless way Trends Prof Yash
Pal
THIS UNIVERSE
|
Computer puts human supremacy in jeopardy There aren’t many quiz shows where the stakes are high for anyone but the participants but in the special episodes of ‘Jeopardy’ on American television this week, the hundreds of thousands of dollars in prize money are very much an afterthought. The real prize: humanity’s continued supremacy in the ongoing struggle to preserve our status against computers. And, last night it was confirmed: man has been trumped by machine. For the human race it might be the moment to concede that even when it comes to the kind of questions that seem to require an intuitive sense of meaning, computers have us licked. Probably the only people truly delighted by the result will be staff at IBM, which made Watson. For three nights this week the little box — not so little because it is backed up off stage by large servers with 15 terabytes (about 15,000 GB) of RAM — has been the star guest in sitting rooms all over America. It is a clash of silicon versus synapses of a kind not since IBM’s Deep Blue took on Gary Kasparov at chess in 1997. Deep Blue won 14 years ago (although Kasparov had won against an earlier version of the machine) and Watson has not disappointed on Jeopardy!, a show that has been a staple on America’s primetime schedules for 47 years. For the occasion the producers brought in the two most successful human contestants ever, Ken Jennings, who had the longest winning streak on the show at 74, and Brad Rutter, who has won the most money from it — $3.2m. With a format that requires general knowledge on every imaginable topic with an answer in the form of a question (say, Q. Mount Everest A. What is the highest mountain in the world?), ‘Jeopardy’ would seem to present a particular challenge to a computer. A wide range of factual knowledge is abetted often by what one might call educated guesses. The very human facets of hunch and instinct are in order. It took a team of 25 computer scientists at IBM four years to come up with Watson. The notion that machines one day might be vested with artificial intelligence and begin to expand the kinds of tasks they can do fascinates us. Still, the computer has not had it all its own way. Recently, Watson bungled what some saw as a relatively easy question asking which “US city” has its largest airport “named for a Second World War hero; its second largest, for a Second World War battle”? The monotone voice of Watson should have asked “What is Chicago?” but instead said “What is Toronto?” The question said US so why did he come up with a Canadian one? But Watson did win the first round overall. “Humanity, do not despair just yet!” cried Alex Trebek, the host of ‘Jeopardy’, talking about the mistake. “Some people at IBM are taking this so seriously. They’re about to release excuses. They should say, ‘Watson made a mistake.’” In another facet the two human champions can grab a question by interrupting intuitively and buzzing to take the question whereas Watson will only buzz when it has an answer: speed versus certitude. Mr Rebek says: “It can never ring in too early and lock itself out. Last night and the night before the guys locked themselves out nine times by trying to
anticipate.
— The Independent |
THIS UNIVERSE
Constantly launching rockets carrying satellites into space is reducing Earth’s weight. Will it have any impact on Earth’s rotation or revolution?
I am amused by your concern about the loss of mass that our planet might be suffering due to our space launches. Most of the mass of the fuel and other material expended in a space launch finally ends up on the Earth itself, though changed in form. The fraction that is lost to deep space is very small. But all this is miniscule compared to what we might be receiving in meteorite hits and settling of interplanetary dust. I do not mean to assert that the Earth is growing in mass because some gases like hydrogen and helium might be continuously draining out. I confess that I do not have figures on long-term change of the Earth’s mass, but I am sure that our space activities are not contributing to this figure in any significant manner.
Readers wanting to ask Prof Yash Pal a question can e-mail him at palyash.pal@gmail.com |
|