New Delhi, February 15
“How could Moninder Singh Pandher be unaware of serial crimes taking place inside his house,” was a poser by the Supreme Court, which today kept pending the CBI’s appeal against his acquittal in a Nithari killing case.“Let the appeal be kept pending and wait for the outcome of other (Nithari) cases. It is a composite case and all cases are related to each other. It would have effect, one way or other, on other pending cases. It is not an isolated case and is about a series of murders. You have been charged with serial killings,” the Bench comprising Justices Markandey Katju and Gyansudha Misra said.

However, the decision evoked objection from RS Sodhi, a former Delhi High Court judge and counsel for 54-year-old Pandher, who said each case was different from the other and could not be connected and the appeal against his acquittal be decided as he had been in jail ever since the cases surfaced in 2005.

“How could he be unaware of the serial crimes taking place inside and near his (Pandher’s) house?” the Bench said while expressing dissatisfaction over Sodhi’s arguments and making clear that any decision on his appeal might have a bearing on many other cases pending against him.

“If he is acquitted by this court at this stage when other cases are for trial, the entire evidence in those cases will go,” the Bench said.

“What about other cases going against you. You were in Australia only for 15 days out of two years during which murders and rapes were going on in your building. It is difficult to believe that you were not aware of them. It is not a case of one murder but 18 and it might have been done with your approval,” the Bench said.

While the Bench was making the remarks, Sodhi said the matter was still sub judice and pleaded that the judges restrain themselves from making observations.

“Don’t make observations. They would adversely hurt my case,” the senior advocate said.

Taking the statement of Sodhi very strongly, the Bench chided him for trying to “rein in the court”.

“You have to respect our anxiety. Don’t try to rein us by making such statements,” the Bench said, adding, “You are living in the house and saying that you were not aware of what was going on inside your house.” It said, “We appreciate your anxiety. You should also appreciate our anxiety...These are only tentative observations based on our view and can change during the course of arguments.”

Realising that the Bench was not in favour of continuing hearing Pandher’s case, Sodhi did not further argue on the court’s decision to keep the CBI’s appeal pending. — PTI

New Delhi, February 15
The Supreme Court today upheld the death sentence awarded to Surinder Singh Koli for murdering 14-year-old Rimpa Haldar, one of the 19 children allegedly subjected to sexual assault and killing in Nithari village on the outskirts of Delhi in 2005-06.

Describing the crime as “horrifying and barbaric,” the court held that the case fell in the rarest of rare category and as such Koli did not deserve any mercy.

In three other cases, the trial court has awarded death penalty to Koli, who, along with his employer Moninder Singh Pandher, was accused of killing and disposing of the bodies of 19 children and a young woman.