SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY |
Ozone study dims Sun's global warming role Why people get ‘unfriended’ First dinosaurs walked on little cat feet Giant penguin fossil gives evolutionary clues Linguists discover new language Global Fund sees disease fight hampered by donors IVF pioneer wins medicine Nobel prize Discovery poses ethical dilemmas Scientists find way to refine Botox for new uses Prof Yash
Pal
This
universe |
Ozone study dims Sun's global warming role THE sun's role in climate change may have been overplayed, according to a study indicating that the Earth could actually get slightly cooler, rather than warmer, as the activity of the 11-year solar cycle increases. Until now it was assumed that as solar activity – indicated by the number of sunspots on the Sun's surface – increases, then so does the amount of solar radiation coming to the Earth to heat the planet. However, a study based on satellite data of the Earth's atmosphere has shown there is a complicated interaction between the varying amounts of radiation from the Sun and the amount of ozone in the atmosphere. The investigation, which ran from 2004 to 2007 when the solar activity cycle was decreasing, found there was a rise in ozone that may have resulted in a corresponding increase in temperatures, which would have been indirectly due to the Sun rather than to increases in man-made greenhouse gases, the scientists said. The researchers emphasised the findings do not undermine the idea that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is the main cause of global warming – but they do suggest the Sun's direct role in warming the planet has been overplayed in computer models. "These results are changing what we thought we knew about the Sun's effect on our climate. However, they only show us a snapshot of the Sun's activity and its behaviour over the three years of our study could be an anomaly," said Joanna Haigh, of the Grantham Institute for Climate Change, at Imperial College London. "We cannot jump to conclusions based on what we have found during this comparatively short period," Dr Haugh said."However, if further studies find the same pattern over a longer period of time, this could suggest that we may have overestimated the Sun's role in warming the planet." Although there is an 11-year solar cycle, the overall activity of the Sun has risen slightly over the past century, leading some climate "sceptics" to suggest the Sun rather then carbon dioxide is causing global warming. However, the authors of the latest study, published in Nature, said solar activity could account for at most about 10 per cent of the extra warming this century. But if the new findings can be supported, it would mean this greater solar activity may have kept global warming in check by lowering temperatures slightly and counteracting the influence of greenhouse
gases. — The Independent |
This
universe
When we go up in the lift, our weight increases. When we come down in the lift, our weight decreases. Why? Gravity is a force that can accelerate a body. The force is usually expressed as Mass multiplied by g, the value of gravitational acceleration. When the lift starts to move up at a certain speed there is an acceleration of the floor of the lift in the upward direction. This adds to the felt weight. If the lift were to fall freely to the ground the floor of the lift will not feel our weight. If we descend at a smaller acceleration our weight as measure by a balance will reduce. There is an important principle, called the Equivalence Principle that states dynamical acceleration of a mass is proportional to gravitational acceleration. We say that light consist of electric and magnetic fields but both perpendicular to the path of propagation then there must be some component along the propagational path of light so as to make it propagate with such a large velocity which is it? Light is electric and magnetic components oscillating normal to each other and also normal to the direction of propagation of light. There is no component oscillating in the direction of propagation of light. When a ray of light scatters in interaction with a molecule of air, it direction is changed and the electric component of the scattered light is again required to be normal to the new direction of propagation of light, but the requirement would be that the electrical component, while oscillating normal to the direction of propagation is constrained in the direction of oscillation. This leads to polarisation of scattered light.
Readers wanting to ask Prof Yash Pal a question can e-mail him at
palyash.pal@gmail.com |