SPORTS & WELLNESS |
Chennai Super King Crowning glory More than meats the eye We have not received Bharat Thakur’s column Fit Zone this week |
|
Hours of preparation and thorough homework by his backroom boys shaped Viswanathan Anand’s victory, writes M. S. Unnikrishnan Viswanathan Anand made the right moves after a numbing defeat in the opening gambit to renew his lease on the world chess crown in a display of resilience and perseverance, which marked him out as a sportsman of exceptional class and talent. Anand’s success at the highest echelons of chess has come after burning a lot of midnight oil, and shedding gallons of sweat and tears. Anand’s triumph was sweeter as he grounded challenger Veselin Topalov of Bulgaria on his home turf at Sofia to hold on the world title for another two years with an astounding 56-move victory with black pieces in the deciding 12th game of the 12-match contest to win by 6.5-5.5 points. This was the 40-year-old Anand’s second consecutive World Championship victory in match format. He first won the world title in 2000 at Teheran, beating Alexei Shirov of Spain, though at that time the chess world was a divided zone. Anand became the undisputed world champion after winning an eight-player contest in 2007 and defended the crown against Vladimir Kramnik a year later. Topalov earned the right to challenge Anand after beating Gata Kamski in 2009 “It is the best win of my career. In terms of intensity, this match would rate as the most difficult,” a relieved Anand said after his title victory. Anand was ranked No 1 in 2007 and became the sixth player to occupy the top spot since ranking was introduced in 1970 —behind Bobby Fischer, Anatoly Karpov, Gary Kasparov, Vladimir Kramnik and Vaselin Topalov. The Indian maestro, who has seen the peaks and troughs with equanimity, has now swept all the chess honours worth winning, including five Oscars. Yet, he remains modest and humble and is still “Baba” to his parents back home in Chennai. Perhaps, even Anand did not expect the match to pan out the way it did after he lost the first and eighth games. From the outset, things went terribly wrong for the reigning champion as first, he was stranded at the Frankfurt airport when ash clouds spewing from the volcanos of Iceland enveloped Europe, leading to the suspension of flights. He had to make a 40-hour drive down across five countries to reach Sofia just a day before the championship, as the FIDE (the world chess body) did not accede to his demand to postpone the championship for three days, but agreed to only a one-day grace period. And before Anand could settle down, Topalov stunned him in the first game. Though Anand fought back to win the second and fourth games, Topalov, playing aggressive moves, neutralised the score with another win in the 8th game. They then played closely fought draws in the next three games before Anand settled the contest with a stunning victory with black pieces in the 12th to avoid the rapid-chess tie-break. Anand pocketed a whopping Rs 6.8 crore from the total purse of 2 million euros. Topalov took home euros 8,00,000. Anand can now hold on to the title till 2012, when the next World Championship contest is expected to be held in London. With four world titles in his name, Anand has become the undisputed master of the chequer board. The player to challenge Anand would be decided in the eight-player Candidates Tournament to be held in 2011. Imagine, Anand, now sitting pretty on the high pedestal, had to go through the qualifying rigmarole himself before meeting Garry Kasparov and Anatoly Kasparov of Russia in the 1990s, and against Alexei Shirov of Spain in 2000, in the title matches. Anand and Topalov had not played any serious chess against each other since 2008, and both were thus in the dark about the game plans of each other. Anand had to be wary of the aggressive Topalov, but his backroom boys did their homework pretty well to enable the World Champion to sail through in the crunch game. Hours of preparation went into Anand’s game plans though each game against Tapolov was a long |
Laying all controversy to rest, the Commonwealth Games Organising Committee has clarified that beef will not be served during the Games scheduled to take place in the national Capital later this year. The organising committee replied with an emphatic "no" to a query by Right to Information (RTI) activist Subhash Chandra Agrawal, who wanted to know if beef was a compulsory item to be served during the Games, scheduled from October 3-14. "The Commonwealth Games Federation's requirement from the organising committee is to provide to a quality 24-hour catering service offering nutritious meals and snacks to the athletes and their team officials during the Commonwealth Games Delhi 2010, taking into consideration, cultural and dietary requirements and the need for variety and rotation of menus. The organising committee is duty-bound to carry this out," the committee replied. Recently, the Delhi government had also clarified that beef will not be served during the Games. Meanwhile, a new study says eating processed meats like salami, sausages and hot dogs is likely to up the risk of heart disease and diabetes. Eating unprocessed beef, pork or lamb appeared not to raise risks of heart attacks and diabetes, but processed meat was associated with a 42 per cent higher risk of heart disease and a 19 per cent higher risk of Type 2 diabetes. Processed meat is defined as any meat preserved by smoking, curing or salting, or with the addition of chemical preservatives; examples include bacon, salami, sausages, hot dogs or processed deli or luncheon meats. Conversely, researchers did not find any higher risk of heart disease or diabetes among individuals eating unprocessed red meat. "Although most dietary guidelines recommend reducing meat
consumption, prior individual studies have shown mixed results for relationships between meat
consumption and cardiovascular diseases and diabetes," said Renata Micha, who led the study. Micha, research fellow in epidemiology at the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH), said: "Most prior studies also did not separately consider the health effects of eating unprocessed red versus processed meats." Researchers, led by Micha and HSPH colleagues Dariush Mozaffarian, assistant professor in epidemiology, and Sarah Wallace, junior research fellow, systematically reviewed nearly 1,600 studies. Twenty relevant studies were identified, which included more than 1.2 million individuals from 10 countries on four continents (US, Europe, Australia, and Asia). The researchers defined unprocessed red meat as any unprocessed meat from mutton, beef, lamb
or pork, excluding poultry, said a Harvard release. These findings were published online
in Circulation. — IANS |