|
Mumbai for marathis? New Delhi, February 1 The BJP president issued a lengthy statement today saying, “It has been a consistent stand of the BJP that the constitutional guarantee under Article 19 (1) (e) that all Indians shall have “the right to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India” aids and enables national unity and integration. It is on the basis of this principle that we have always opposed Article 370 in the context of J&K as an impediment in national unity.” “The BJP has always recognised linguistic, regional and religious identities as a reality of India. But the strength of India’s unity in diversity is achieved when all these identities eventually converge into a larger national identity of Indianness. There is and can never be a conflict between these,” he said. Gadkari, however, tried to play down the political import of his statement in challenging the Shiv Sena premise, maintaining that since both were independent parties, they could have different views on several issues. But the issue could become complicated. Faced with stiff competition from prodigal nephew Raj Thackeray, Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray has attempted to return to his original agenda of Mumbai for Marathis and other related hate issues. Denouncing the Sena thesis, RSS chief Mohanrao Bhagwat questioned the premise and first pronounced “Mumbai for all Indians”. Then prominent Sena leader and former Maharashtra Chief Minister Manohar Joshi reiterated the Thackeray line of Mumbai only for Marathis. And later Sena working president and Balasaheb’s son Udhav Thackeray snubbed Bhagwat forcing Gadkari to react sharply to the Sena tirade. Gadkari, the first Maharashtrian to head the BJP, clearly indicated that the BJP was keen to go public on its differences with the Shiv Sena on the issue.
Uddhav Thackeray lashes out at Ram Madhav Mumbai, February 1 Thackeray hit out at RSS leader Ram Madhav for his comments on Sunday asking Sangh cadres to protect north Indians in Mumbai from the Shiv Sena. “We don’t need lessons in patriotism and unity from Ram Madhav,” Thackeray told reporters here today. Questioning the commitment of RSS to Hindus, Thackeray said the organisation did not matter in Mumbai. “Where was the RSS when the Sena protected the Hindus during the 1992 riots with Muslim,” he asked. He went on to advise Madhav to take up the cause of Hindi-speaking people in Assam or concentrate on teaching the language to the people of south Indian states. Uddhav also hit out at the RSS for ignoring the plight of Marathi people who, as per him, were discriminated against in Karnataka's Belgaum district. The Shiv Sena leader also warned that his party would not tolerate any “anti-Marathi” stand by any organisation. “Anyone coming in the way of Marathi people would have to first face the Sena,” he said. Thackeray’s unequivocal opposition to the senior leadership of the RSS comes at a time when the Sena's ally, the BJP, is toeing the Sangh line. With both the saffron outfits not bothering to qualify their bipolar stands like they did in the past, it remains to be seen how they put an united front in Maharashtra in the coming days.
Tiff an example of hypocrisy: Cong
New Delhi, February 1 “This is an example of hypocrisy and political opportunism. The BJP and the Shiv Sena have been together for the last 15-17 years. The Shiv Sena repeatedly used filthy, derogatory and demeaning language against migrants. Not once have we found its negation by the BJP or its remote-controller RSS,” party spokesman Abhishek Singhvi. Claiming that only the Congress had spoken for national unity and integration, Singhvi said, “If they (BJP-RSS) are speaking the language of the Congress, it is a compliment for the party, but before that they should make their stand clear.” BJP has joined the RSS to take on its key ally Shiv Sena head on, asserting that the party does not believe in any regional identity that “discriminates” among Indians. “We respect as a ground reality that at a regional level there is tradition, heritage and language identity. But there is no conflict between regional and national identity. And so, we do not believe in any linguistic, religious or regional identity that discriminates or differentiates,” BJP President Nitin Gadkari said. Singhvi maintained that this was intended to “fool” the people and mislead them to forget the BJP-RSS stand of last 15-20 years. “At the minimum, they (BJP-RSS) should unequivocally declare their stand on the issue,” he said. The Congress spokesman said the BJP and the Shiv Sena have been coalition partners for long, even as the Sena used a similar language against the people of south India in the 1960s and thereafter.
Reserve jobs for ethnic
Marathis: Raj Mumbai, January 1 “Only because you can write, read and speak Marathi does not give you the right to take away jobs of the locals," Raj said at a party function on . All jobs in Maharashtra, Raj said, should be reserved for ethnic Marathis. "If you are not a Marathi by birth you are not entitled to jobs here," Raj said. He went on to chide party workers who were distributing Marathi primers to North Indian taxi drivers in Mumbai. "Who told you to teach them Marathi?" Raj asked his party workers. |
|
HOME PAGE | |
Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir |
Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs |
Nation | Opinions | | Business | Sports | World | Letters | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi | | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |