Indian
kidney
GLobal
trade
The recent multi-crore
kidney scandal, exploiting the poor for trading in their organs,
exposes a number of glaring loopholes in the law and raises
questions about the role of the authorities,
says Aarti
Kapur
A policeman inspects the well-equipped operation theatre at Amit Kumar’s clinic in Gurgaon
|
THE Rs 100-crore
kidney racket unearthed at Gurgaon recently has shocked one and
all for its sheer magnitude and the highly organised way in
which it was being run by ‘doctors’ for the last eight
years. The incident has brought to light the growing Asian organ
bazaar that sources kidneys from the poor and possibly ignorant
donors to recipients in the Middle East, Europe, North America
and South Asia.
The kingpin of the
racket, ‘Dr’ Amit Kumar, a graduate of ayurvedic medicine,
used his three-storeyed house in Gurgaon to carry out his
nefarious activities in connivance with over two dozen doctors,
touts and possibly even the local police. Interestingly, even
eight years back Amit Kumar was booked in connection with an
organ trafficking case and his Gurgaon house, with
state-of-the-art surgical facilities, was sealed by the Delhi
police. Surprisingly, the local police neither paid any
attention nor took any action when the house was reopened and
brazenly misused yet again.
This kingpin’s
involvement with the kidney trade surfaced even in the 1980s,
when he was booked by the Mumbai police for similar charges.
Each time, however, he succeeded in getting bail. The
Transplantation of Human Organs Act came into force only in
1994. Earlier such offenders were booked for
"cheating" under the Indian Penal Code.
With the recent
racket some glaring legal loopholes were brought to light. The
current Act is also expected to undergo amendments. Minister of
Health Anbumani Ramadoss recently announced that besides asking
the CBI to probe the racket, the ministry was determined to
amend the existing organs transplant Act to plug the loopholes
and make it more transparent.
This time round
the lid was blown off the multi-crore racket, spanning six
states, when a complaint was lodged with the Moradabad police
about a labourer who was duped into parting with one of his
kidneys. The local police along with its counterparts in Gurgaon
swung into action and carried out raids on properties of Amit
Kumar to discover the massive operation that thrived on
exploiting the poor and fleecing rich recipients. Five labourers
were rescued from the premises. Of them, Sakil of Ghaziabad,
Vasim of Ahmedabad, Salim of Kotwali had already had their
kidneys removed, while Ajay and Sanjay Kumar of Meerut were due
for surgery in a day or two. Also found at the clinic during the
raid were four Greek nationals and a NRI couple from the UK.
They were detained by the police and are being questioned. All
of them are suspected to be buyers of the kidneys being sold at
the clinic illegally.
It is suspected
that in the past eight years more than 500 kidneys were
transplanted by the racketeers. The victims were brought from
Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Haryana,
Rajasthan and even Nepal. The culprits (doctors involved) were
never short of donors or margins in this clandestine operation
that continued for years without any checks. Since the number of
donors never matches up to the global requirements of kidneys,
the whole trade flourished despite occasional reports of organ
selling in countries like India, Pakistan and China. The
industry was well fed by poor and needy donors who were lured
with money and at times even coerced to live with a single
kidney.
The Gurgaon
scandal reveals that the organ bazaar of India was mainly driven
by foreign clients (patients) who could afford to pay a hefty
sum to get the prized product. More than 50 per cent of the
patients operated for kidney transplantation by Amit Kumar were
from the US, UK, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Greece, England and
Canada. His e-mail account shows 48 requests for kidney
transplantation from foreigners and NRIs from different
countries across the globe.
The racketeers
sold one kidney for Rs 18 lakh or even more, while the donor was
paid only between Rs 50,000 and Rs 1 lakh. Police sources say
over the years, Amit Kumar had attained expertise in finding
people who were in desperate need of the organ and those who had
capacity to shell out a large amount of money.
Medical experts
say Asian countries with a large population living in extreme
poverty are a haven for such a thriving trade as there is no
dearth of donors. Despite the Transplantation of Human Organs
Act in the country and paucity of voluntary donors, the organs
market continued to meet the demands of foreign clients from
affluent countries.
As per Indian
Medical Association (IMA) figures, the requirement of kidneys in
India is around 1.8 lakh per year, but the number of patients
who are operated for kidney transplantation is just 10,000 to
12,000 per year. Eighty per cent of the patients in India
survive on dialysis for about two years and thereafter die due
to non-availability of kidney donors. The life of only about 20
per cent of the patients is saved by donors, who are generally
paid a handsome sum.
While talking to The
Tribune, Dr S P Yadav, Senior Urologist, Gurgaon Pushpanjali
Hopital, stated that the recent kidney racket had exposed how
the organ market was being run in the name of medical tourism
for foreigners. This illegal trafficking had raised a tricky
situation for a country like India where on the one side kidney
patients are dying each year due to non-availability of organs
while on the other quacks had opened up a whole new market for
selling organs to foreigners.
Ironically, Dr
Yadav, whose hospital got the approval for organ transplantation
in October last year, failed to perform even a single
transplantation due to non-availability of donors in Gurgaon.
The urologist says such a situation is the result of two
reasons: firstly, it is usually seen that blood relatives of
patients are not ready to donate their organs and, secondly, the
procedure of voluntary donation is so complicated that donors
prefer to avoid it. Even surgeons who conduct kidney
transplantations fear the law as a number of legal complications
can arise even if they have the consent of the voluntary donor.
The Gurgaon IMA
Secretary, Dr Subrat Saxena, stated that the situation could
improve if the government would liberalise the organs Act. He
said that due to legal complications even the medical fraternity
sometimes avoided transplantations in their hospitals. This was
adversely affecting needy patients who were unable to get timely
medical help.
Chinks
in the law
ONE OF THE VICTIMS: Sakil, a resident of Ghaziabad, was rescued by the police from Kumar’s residence
|
The
Transplantation of the Human Organs Act 1994 says close
relatives of recipient like parents, children, brothers,
sisters and spouse can donate the organ without government
clearance.
-
All other relatives who wish to donate the organ need to
appear before the Authorisation Committee for clearance
and, only after its approval and clearance, can get the
organ transplanted. The Authorisation Committee set up for
the purpose ensures all the documents required under the
Act have been supplied.
-
The Act does not allow exchange of money between the donor
and the recipient.
-
Organ sales are banned by the Act. Therefore, no foreigner
can get a local donor. If it is found money has been
exchanged in the process then both the recipient as well
as the donor is considered as prime offenders under the
law.
Loopholes
According to
sub-clause (3), Clause 9, of Chapter II in the Act:
"If any donor authorises the removal of any of his
human organs before his death for transplantation into the
body of such recipient not being a near relative as is
specified by the donor, by reason of affection and
attachment towards the recipient or for any other special
reasons, such human organ shall not be removed and
transplanted without the prior approval of the
Authorisation Committee."
Experts say
this clause in the law that permits unrelated donors to
donate live kidneys for reasons of "affection and
attachment" has been misused by unscrupulous persons.
It is not necessarily difficult to find an unrelated donor
who suddenly develops an "affection or
attachment" for the recipient provided he or she is
properly rewarded.
In addition,
the Authorisation Committee set up by the respective state
governments only ensures that all documents needed under
the Act have been supplied. The Committee has neither the
means nor the authority to verify the facts stated in an
affidavit before a magistrate. If unscrupulous hands
exchange money in getting the donors then the recipients
as well as the donors are prime offenders under the
present law. Medical bodies have been demanding suitable
amendments in this law to enable a person to donate a
kidney for a consideration.
|
|