HEALTH & FITNESS |
Proper brushing makes teeth
healthy Taking the pill cuts risk of
cancer Do’s and don’ts for
low-back pain Health Notes
|
Proper brushing makes teeth healthy “A tooth in socket is worth a diamond in pocket” In fact, a healthy tooth in the mouth is worth even more than a diamond: a diamond can be bought with money but a tooth, once lost, can never be got again. There is nothing like a natural tooth; this realisation in fact comes only when one starts losing them. A clean neat tooth will stay healthy in the mouth, whereas a dirty tooth will develop dental cavities and gum (periodontal) disease, leading ultimately to its loss. The most important measure to keep teeth healthy is to clean them every day; a tooth brush, dental floss and inter-dental brush are required. First of all, why do we brush? The main concept behind brushing is to reduce the number of bacteria (micro-organisms) in the mouth. Are bacteria really present in our mouth? The answer is “yes”. Bacteria stick on the teeth in large numbers and their collection on the teeth is called dental plaque. Using a colouring dye, the dental plaque on the teeth can be seen with the naked eye. If the number of bacteria is less in the mouth, most of these would be oxygen loving bacteria (i.e. aerobic), which are not harmful. However, as they multiply and the total number of bacteria increases, they pile on one another. There is resultant depletion of oxygen and not enough for all. With the result, facultative and anaerobic organisms — the bacteria that can live and multiply in limited or in the absence of oxygen — take birth. These bacteria are harmful for the teeth and gums and produce cavities and gum/periodontal disease. Brushing reduces the population of bacteria to low levels and then the environment in the mouth and around teeth remains aerobic and anaerobic bacteria do not get favourable conditions to arise and grow. Half-hearted and insufficient brushing does not make sense as the bacteria will get dislodged from one surface and deposited at another surface. So, for that reason even repeated brushing, five to six times or even more, cannot keep the bacterial population low. In the normal brushing routine, if one is using tooth paste, one cannot brush for more than one or two minutes as the mouth becomes filled with foam and one gets a feeling that one has brushed thoroughly well. The minimum time required for brushing is five minutes: dry your brush first without tooth paste and as the mouth becomes filled with spit, it can be spat out; this is continued. This way the bacteria are dislodged slowly and thrown out of the mouth along with each spit. After this, apply tooth paste and brush again for 20 to 40 seconds. One can also use the toothpaste twice to get a good effect. It is like greasy hands get cleaner after second scrub with soap. A question that is often asked is: would over-brushing lead to wearing out of enamel? The answer is “no”. Enamel is the hardest substance in the human body with a mineral content of 96 per cent, and brushing will not erode it. The recommendation is to use a soft brush and repeated movements. Just remember to brush all the sides of teeth — outer that face the cheeks and lips and inner facing the tongue. The time of brushing is very important, after dinner and breakfast are the best times. Of these two timings, at least once a day thorough brushing of a five-minute duration should be done, and the ideal time for this is after dinner. Thorough brushing at night time is important because the mouth remains closed at night during sleep, the salivary secretions lessen and the mouth acts as an ideal incubator for multiplication of bacteria. So, if their number is reduced to the minimum at bed time before sleep, the bacterial counts in the mouth in the morning will not be large enough to cause dental disease. If one has skipped thorough brushing at night, it may be performed any time of the day. It also helps to keep the mouth fresh. The writer is Professor, Oral Health Sciences Centre, PGI, Chandigarh. Email:
chawlahs@gmail.com
|
Taking the pill cuts risk of cancer The contraceptive pill should be made available to women over the counter after the largest study of its link with ovarian cancer showed it has prevented 100,000 deaths from the disease worldwide. Fifty years after the pill was launched, The Lancet medical journal says it is time to remove the requirement for a doctor’s prescription and offer it directly to women on demand. Its call is prompted by “dramatic” findings from a huge study of ovarian cancer, published simultaneously in The Lancet, which combined results from 45 smaller studies in 21 countries. The findings show that taking the pill sharply reduces the risk of developing ovarian cancer and the protective effect increases with length of use. For individual women, the reduction in risk is small – ovarian cancer is a rare disease – but because an estimated three million women take the pill in Britain and 100 million round the world, it has a large effect. Researchers led by Professor Valerie Beral, head of the Cancer Research UK epidemiology unit at Oxford University, found that in Western countries, including the UK, 10 years of taking the pill reduced the incidence of ovarian cancer before age 75 from 12 cases per 1,000 women to eight. Deaths were cut from seven women per 1,000 to five. The most remarkable finding, the researchers say, is that the protection lasted for more than 30 years after pill use was stopped. This is important because ovarian cancer is commoner in older women who have passed the menopause. Professor Beral said: “Worldwide, the pill has already prevented 200,000 women from developing cancer of the ovary and has prevented 100,000 deaths from the disease. More than 100 million women are now taking the pill, so the number of ovarian cancers prevented will rise over the next few decades to about 30,000 per year.” For decades after the pill was launched, it was almost constantly under a cloud of suspicion, fuelled by concerns about the social and sexual revolution that it ushered in. A stream of reports suggested the harm it caused by increasing the risk of blood clots and of certain cancers might outweigh its benefits. Now the tide has turned. Last September, one of the longest studies of the pill, spanning 36 years and run by the Royal College of General Practitioners, showed that it reduced the risk of three cancers – ovarian, womb and bowel – in women who took it, for up to eight years. It neither increased nor reduced the risk of breast cancer but the study did show a small increase in cervical cancer. This was outweighed by the reduction in the other cancers. That finding, published in the BMJ, has now been confirmed and deepened by the latest study in the Lancet. The co-author, Sir Richard Peto, professor of epidemiology at Oxford University, said: “Young women don’t have to worry about cancer from taking the pill because the eventual reduction in ovarian cancer is bigger than any increase in other types of cancer caused by the pill.” — The Independent
|
Do’s and don’ts for low-back pain Proper treatment of low -back pain entails finding out the cause. Preventing further agony and discomfort also requires undergoing appropriate treatment and rehabilitation. Inadequate rehabilitation leads to the recurrence of back-pain, resulting in physical limitations. Even slight improvements in day- to-day life — posture, etc — also helps a lot. Using a different chair, supporting the back while sitting can also bring relief. Rehabilitation in the form of physical exercises can improve circulation, lead to stronger muscles and thereby functional ability of the back muscles. Certain do’s and don’ts also help: DO’S DON’TS The writer is a former doctor/physiotherapist, Indian cricket team.
|
Health Notes Washington: Already known for their capability of leading the blind, alerting the deaf, and helping the physically disabled with daily tasks, dogs may also prove helpful in maintaining the blood sugar levels of diabetics. This suggestion comes from researchers at Queen’s University in Belfast, Northern Ireland, who are looking for evidence to verify whether dogs can reliably detect dangerous blood sugar level drops in diabetics.
— ANI Parental drinking influences teen drinking
Washington: A new study has shown that parental drinking not only directly influences adolescent drinking, but also indirectly through teens’ perceptions of parenting, especially monitoring and discipline received. Adolescence is a crucial time of development on many different levels, but especially concerning the initiation and escalation of alcohol use. The new findings highlight the impact of parental drinking and parenting practices on adolescent drinking. “We wanted to, first, examine the extent of the relationship between the drinking behaviours of parents and those of their adolescent offspring at 14 and 17.5 years of age,” said Shawn J. Latendresse, a postdoctoral research fellow at the Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioural Genetics at Virginia Commonwealth University, and corresponding author for the study.
— ANI
Gym food can make you emerge fatter than before
London: Running on the treadmill in the health club might be good for the body, but refuelling yourself in the club restaurant after the workout can make you emerge fatter than before, say nutritionists. The health experts point out that some gyms in Britain are serving up too many stodgy meals packed full of fat, salt and sugar. In the worst cases, according to their analysis, the calorie count of some lunches would take the equivalent of a half-day working out in the gym to burn off. “In most places if you choose well you can eat healthily. But some gyms offer things that are really not healthy such as fries and foods dripping with cheese, which sends out a mixed message. It could undo all the good work people are trying to do when they go to the gym,” The Scotsman quoted Carina Norris, a nutritionist at Queen Margaret University in Edinburgh, as saying. One expert said that some gyms could be serving up unhealthy dishes to maximise profits.
— ANI
UK docs told not to prescribe antibiotics for minor ailments
London: England’s Chief Medical Officer Sir Liam Donaldson has expressed concern over unnecessary prescription of antibiotics to treat minor ailments such as coughs, colds and sore throats, in a third of all cases. He insists that the proper use of antibiotics was vital in the battle against superbugs such as MRSA. However, he adds, the liberal use of medicines has led to bugs becoming resistant to treatment. Donaldson’s statement comes as the Government launches a 270-million-pound campaign on the unnecessary use of drugs such as penicillin.
— ANI |