Saturday, September 23, 2006 |
Gen-Next
might not remember an era when Doordarshan had a channel monopoly and
also a monopoly on showing feature films on TV. But its monopoly did not
protect it from the dictates of the film-makers who laid down the law as
far as release of their films on TV was concerned: a long period had to
elapse before a successful feature film released in cinemas could be
shown on the small screen. They said that if viewers could see feature
films so soon on TV, who would want to go to the cinema? So DD took the
easy way out: it started showing all the flop films down the years, long
forgotten flops which their makers had written off. Their producers were
delighted but viewers felt totally let down. But times have changed.
And those viewers who find cinema tickets too exorbitant or queuing for
tickets or fighting one’s way down the aisles physically challenging
are now happy to find that some great classics as well as recent
successes are now being shown regularly. Now, one can keep up with
contemporary trends in film-making. And ironically enough, Doordarshan
is now among the channels which are regularly showing good feature
films. And while the makers of blockbusters are happy as long as their
stars get coverage on TV and as long as their films are not released on
the small screen, makers of small budget "different" films —
in theme and style — are also happy that the small screen is acting
like the film societies of earlier days and keeping film buffs as well
as the more serious members of Gen-Next involved in serious cinema. So
in the last few months one has seen Sholay, Do Bigha Zameen and
my favourite Gol Maal, which I am not ashamed to say I saw for
the umpteenth time last week and enjoyed every moment of the Amol
Palekar-Utpal Dutt encounter. With his new avatar of making films about
ghosts and homosexuals, one tends to forget the lovely boy-next-door
roles Amol Palekar played for Hrishida or the simple themes in Marathi
contexts that he directed. It is so good to see his old films again.
Gen-Next also needs to be acquainted with great actors like Balraj
Sahni, who worked for the BBC in London but played to perfection the
role of a humble rickshaw-puller on the streets of Calcutta. He was back
in Chetan Anand’s classic war film Haqeeqat last week and
viewers must have been grateful, as this columnist was, for a chance to
see this old classic. At one time, all over the world, there was a fear
that TV would wipe out the big screen. But in the ultimate analysis, the
two screens have learnt to co-exist, to the benefit of not only viewers
but also producers. The big events of last week were the Mumbai trials,
the hounding of Bina Ramani, and, of course, our man in Havana, the PM
and his historic meeting with Fidel Castro. Alas, there was not a visual
of the meeting, but NDTV’s Barkha Dutt, filing away like mad, was soon
followed by rival channels, not always so well connected. The Mumbai
trials were also meticulously followed and even if some excited
reporters stuttered and stammered (well channels no longer seem to care
for trained reporters), one had to be content. The cricket Tri-series
in Kuala Lumpur dominated sports with Kolkata’s Sunfeast Open tennis
coming a poor second. And, then there was KPS Gill’s classic comment
on Indian hockey: "One must keep on losing before one can
win," One can only say Amen. If I return to the horrifies of ads,
obtruding on sports, one must begin with DD, which started it all in its
monopolistic days by showing more advertisement than sport and cutting
in with brutal greed combined with ignorance. Last week I referred to
Ten Sports robbing viewers of vital moments of tennis. Last week it was
the turn of Zee Sports. Not content with fobbing off viewers with glam
girls with forced smiles and diaphanous dresses treating us to quizzes,
endless sponsors ads and leaving the top cricket commentators smiling
but frustrated, we had a new addition to ad stupidity. They are always
thinking of new ways to harass the poor viewer and this time Zee capped
it all by doing something which is a record for even Indian TV. It
showed ads not only on top of the screen while play was on but also
imposed the visuals of ads on the heads and faces of players while they
were actually playing. This is not only unforgivable but also an insult
to viewers. And cutting off the end of an over, depriving viewers of a
chance to see fall of a wicket, let alone hear the experts analyse the
play between overs can be described as a crime. But no one, least of all
the moralistic I and B Ministry, seems to care. |
|
|