SOCIETY
 

A class apart 
It is possible to make learning in government schools a joyful experience, says Varsha Das, delving into the recently published book Improving Government Schools
I
n India, millions of poor children access education only through government schools. But these schools are often neither engaging nor innovative. Is it possible to change the rot in government schools? Is it really possible to convert the stuffy classrooms into spaces where children really learn with joy?



Top









A class apart 
It is possible to make learning in government schools a joyful experience, says Varsha Das, delving into the recently published book Improving Government Schools

In India, millions of poor children access education only through government schools. But these schools are often neither engaging nor innovative. Is it possible to change the rot in government schools? Is it really possible to convert the stuffy classrooms into spaces where children really learn with joy?

Cynics would contest this, knowing the poor quality of education in most government schools. But a recent book, Improving Government Schools: What has been tried and what works — edited by Mandira Kumar and Padma M Sarangapani — tempts us to believe that a long-lasting change in the system is possible.

The book is the result of a documentation project done by Sutradhar, a Bangalore-based educational centre. Sutradhar undertook the project to document various ‘intrusions’ in government schools. The 23 initiatives presented in the book go beyond the individuals and organisations to understand the design of the interventions themselves, and the processes — both within the organisation and on the field.

Take PRISM (Project in Science and Maths), which aimed to energise government schools in Maharashtra, a joint effort of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation and the Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education. The project focused on strengthening the teachers’ abilities to teach subjects like science and mathematics. For example, while teaching a lesson on ‘Tame and Wild Animals’, teachers normally put usefulness of domestic animals against the fierceness of wild animals. But PRISM encouraged teachers to start a debate in the class by posing the question: ‘Can tigress’ milk be used by humans?’ It generated lively discussions. Children had to put in a lot of effort and think about what taming an animal involves.

Another NGO, Suvidya from Bangalore, developed a maths lab of 100 items — about 65 materials and 35 charts — to make mathematics interesting and enjoyable. (Some of the lab material was made with old greeting cards. The folk game chowkabhara was adapted for mathematical problems.) The lab encouraged children to take initiative, ask questions, and even feel free to correct the teacher.

The School Health Education Programme in Thane district, Maharashtra, initiated by the Foundation for Research in Community Health, used children’s own bodies as teaching aids. For example, the heart was drawn on the body of a child indicating the exact location and size. Children heard their own heart beat, felt their pulse, used a magnifying glass to observe teeth, hands, skin and flies, and used a thermometer to measure body temperature.

The Centre for Learning Resources — again in Maharashtra — devised a novel project of interactive radio. The distance teacher does the bulk of the teaching, directs activities such as exercises and songs, and answers questions that are raised within the lesson. There are time slots during the broadcast for children to respond to questions, or dialogue with each other. The class teacher facilitates this process and adds to it after the lesson is over. It thus turns the traditionally one-way technology of radio, into a two-way one. This technology helped rural children cope with their fear of learning and speaking English.

Interestingly, many of the initiatives are confined to a few states — Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Delhi and Karnataka. The editors were surprised not to find any remarkable experiments in states like West Bengal, Orissa, Kerala and Tamil Nadu — where NGOs have a strong presence.

In 1986, NGO Eklavya in Madhya Pradesh began the groundbreaking task of making the school social science curriculum more meaningful and interesting for children, and to help learners face reality. The Prathmik Shiksha Karyakram, known as Prashika, grew from an experiment conducted by Eklavya. It developed the Khushi-Khushi (happiness) series of textbooks for Classes I to V in regular Hindi language. The local history, geography and culture form an integral part of the content. These textbooks have an abundance of illustrations, games, riddles, poems and puzzles that invite children to learn.

The Concerned for Working Children, an NGO based in Karnataka, has been one of the first in the country to look at the complexities and interrelationships between child labour and education. Their programme helps to address the everyday situation of government schools such as multigrade learning, absenteeism, the needs of special groups such as children with disabilities or slow learners, and children from disadvantaged families who need relevant education.

Valmiki Vanam is the first ‘satellite school’ established with the initiative of the Rishi Valley Rural Education Centre (REC) in Andhra Pradesh. The children who study here come from poor Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe villages. There are 17 such satellite schools. Dr Radhika Herzberger, Director, REC, envisages the development of the village school as a kind of village commons: a new kind of public space in the village, nurturing and rejuvenating the traditional commons and wastelands that a village has.

Curriculum built around local issues could offer a solution to social conflicts of our times. Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Uttar Pradesh and Assam governments have replicated this pedagogy in their schools and have begun to bring in the much-awaited change.

Studies of various initiatives indicate that providing computers to government schoolchildren is seen as a step towards digital equality, and a way to attract children to school. There is also a growing trend among corporate houses to set up trusts and foundations that can directly engage with social issues. Many of them recognise education as the key to socio-economic progress. They have provided computer labs to schools and have trained teachers in using computers.

Clearly, all projects were ultimately dependent on how the teachers received these intrusions. Their sustenance also depended on gaining additional spaces for teachers for academic and professional work within the school system.

Although few in expanse, the 23 initiatives give a wonderful idea about how enjoyable learning in government schools can be. The dream to make poor children learn with joy is still within reach. — WFS

The writer is a former Director of the National Book Trust

Top

HOME PAGE