|
Amarinder gets bail in defamation
case Chandigarh, October 22 The CM was directed to be granted bail on furnishing a bond for Rs 10,000, along with a surety of the same amount by the UT Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mr C.L. Mohal. The CM’s surety was furnished by a retired Superintendent of the Punjab Public Relations Department, Mr Surinder. After the bail was granted, Mr Badal’s counsel pleaded that the CM should be asked to file a reply on an application filed by the former CM. Mr Badal had sought directions for placing a copy of his reply on record. The reply had been addressed to the Superintendent of Police, Vigilance Bureau, by Mr Badal. Reacting to the defence counsel plea, Capt Amarinder Singh’s counsel argued that he had not got a copy of the application filed by Mr Badal and sought time to file a reply in the case. After hearing the plea, Mr Mohal directed that a copy of the application be given to the CM’s counsel. The CM’s counsel also requested the court to fix the next date of hearing in December as Capt Amarinder Singh will be busy in the campaigning of elections to be held in five states in November. Mr Mohal adjourned the case till December
3. |
|
CM, Badal avoid eye contact in court Chandigarh, October 22 The present and the former ministers from both sides sat silently as the Captain and Mr Badal, standing hardly at a distance of 15 feet, avoided eye contact. For the Captain, his appearance in a defamation case filed by Mr Badal may have been the beginning of an end, but for Mr Badal it was nothing less than a battle won. He had the satisfaction of seeing Capt Amarinder Singh as an accused in the docks — at least this is what he told the media after the proceedings concluded. Talking to the media soon after he was granted bail by the court, the Captain asserted, “I want the proceedings to finish as soon as possible so that the truth comes to light”. He declared that the Vigilance Bureau would present the charge sheet against Mr Badal by the end of the month. Regarding the move to seek exemption from personnel appearance, the Captain asserted, “I will appear in the case as long as the court wants me to. I will stop coming only after I am granted exemption”. Denying the allegations of evading appearance, the Captain said he could not appear in the court twice because of health and security reasons. Mr Badal, on the other hand, claimed that “security threat” was just an excuse to stay away from the court. “Security cover can be a problem for me, not for him”, Mr Badal added. Terming the allegations as “false”, Mr Badal said, “They have nothing against us. If they had any evidence, it would have been presented a long time back. Interestingly, they got statements from 15 people, all of them were wrong. I challenge them to prove the authenticity of even one statement”. Earlier during the day, as the two stood in front of each other in the courtroom of UT Chief Judicial Magistrate C.L. Mohal, their eyes did not meet. In fact, the Captain hardly said anything during the 10-minute-long proceedings. Rather his counsel M.L. Saggar did all the talking. He requested for a date in December so that the Captain was free from election work. Standing right opposite, Mr Badal silently watched the proceedings while his counsel argued before the Magistrate. Even as the proceedings continued in the second-floor courtroom, battlecries could be heard, loud and clear. For the action, adequate security arrangements had been made by the Chandigarh police. The entire area had been cordoned off. The gate opposite the police station too had been closed. Everywhere you looked, you could see armed police personnel standing next to the armoured vehicles as the traffic police tried its best to manage the rush. Even Punjab police personnel and commandos were present, “eyeing everyone with suspicion”. The lawyers and the litigants, caught unawares, were thoroughly frisked before they managed to push their way through the jostling crowd only to find more security guards blocking the corridors with the help of ropes. In fact, the visitors were not even allowed to go beyond the first floor till the proceedings continued. Later, Akali Dal supporters, raising anti-government slogans, blocked the exit forcing the Captain to walk up to the gate in an attempt to convince the agitating rival party members. After his efforts failed to bear results, he got into the car before the rushing vehicle made its way out of the court complex. |
|||
Fresh notices served on Badals Chandigarh, October 22 According to sources in the bureau, while Mr Sukhbir Badal has been asked to appear again in the office of the DIG , Economic Offences Wing ( EOW), on October 24 to submit clarifications and records of the properties, Mr Majithia has been served with a notice, asking him to appear for questioning in the EOW office on October 27. He has been asked to appear for investigations keeping in view his proximity with Nippy Dhanoa, Chandigarh police Assistant Sub-Inspector, Nirbhjit Singh, who was nabbed by the immigration authorities at the Delhi airport last week while he was trying to flee the country. In the notice served upon Mr Majithia, he had been asked to bring along papers of his vehicle, in which, according to bureau officials, Nippy had travelled to New Delhi. He had also been asked to bring his passport, which would help ascertain his links and the kind of activities he had been involved in. The bureau had in the Kharar court, at the time of seeking his remand , claimed that Nippy had during his interrogation revealed his proximity with Mr Majithia and a few others and that he knew Mr Sukhbir only through them. He would also be questioned on benami properties of Mr Sukhbir. Nippy is also believed to have told investigating officers that he had contacted Mr Majithia for help, when he was nabbed by the immigration authorities at the airport. He even confessed to have had made an investment of Rs 35-40 lakh in the much-publicised film Hawayein and his having made properties during his prime postings during the Badal regime. Meanwhile, the bureau which is not satisfied with the written replies furnished last week by the Badals, has again sought the appearance of Mr Sukhbir for questioning along with the details of his properties and the financial transactions, while Mr Badal and his wife have been asked to furnish some more clarifications with regard to their sources of income and expenditure by October 24 as the figures quoted by them in their replies do not tally with the calculations of the bureau. The bureau had earlier questioned both father and son for over four hours, but certain queries still remain unanswered even after they furnished the written replies last week. The sources reveal that while the Badals have not been able to explain the gaps in the sources of income and expenditure, Mr Sukhbir is yet to account for the financial transactions, particularly the huge amounts pumped into Orbit Resorts, Gurgaon, his benami properties, loans raised from his close relatives and details of the companies floated by him. |
HOME PAGE | |
Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir |
Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs |
Nation | Opinions | | Business | Sports | World | Mailbag | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | National Capital | | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |