Log in ....Tribune

Monday, October 20, 2003
Feature

Napster is a paid site now
Derek Caney

Recording star Ludacris checks out his album on the new Napster Online music service at a launch event in New York City. The new Napster 2.0 will officially launch in the USA on October 29. The new service will offer 0.99 cent downloads and boasts the largest digital music library in the world with more than 5,00,000 songs.
Recording star Ludacris checks out his album on the new Napster Online music service at a launch event in New York City. The new Napster 2.0 will officially launch in the USA on October 29. The new service will offer 0.99 cent downloads and boasts the largest digital music library in the world with more than 5,00,000 songs. 

THE name is the same. The game is a little different. Napster, the file-swapping service that set music fans on their ears and sent the music industry into apoplectic fits, is resurrecting itself as a pay service two years after its free service collapsed under the weight of lawsuits.

Under its parent Roxio Inc., which bought the Napster assets out of bankruptcy in late 2002, Napster last week introduced a test version of its new software that will sell individual songs for 99 cents each, albums for $9.95 or monthly "all-you-can-eat" subscriptions for $9.95.

Ironically, Napster sounded the opening salvo of the online music revolution in 1999 when it launched a free service that allowed users to download digital music from other users and in turn make their songs available to others.

The music industry has blamed such file-sharing services for its sharp decline in music sales over the last few years. Napster’s relaunch is the latest example in a crowded field of online services aiming to convert an online community used to getting their music for free into paying customers.

One of the most successful of these services, Apple Computer Inc.’s iTunes, is widely expected to launch a version of its service for Microsoft Windows users next week. Others include RealNetworks Inc.’s RealNetworks Inc.’s Rhapsody service and privately held companies like MusicMatch and BuyMusic.com.

Dell Inc., AOL Time Warner Inc.’s America Online and Amazon Inc. are also considering services of their own. They all will continue to compete with free services like Kazaa, even as the record industry tries to stamp out such operations in court.

"Clearly Napster is a well-known brand," says James Preissler, associate director of research for Majestic Research. "But there are other powerful brands out there, like AOL, Amazon, Dell and others. It remains to be seen what products they release and how well they compete." He noted that the market potential for online music was huge for the service that was the easiest to use and provided the best value. "But it’s way too early in the game to say who that’s going to be," he says. In its free incarnation, Napster garnered 60 million users at its peak, until the five largest record companies successfully sued for copyright infringement. It shut down in 2001, and after several attempts to relaunch as a pay service, it filed for bankruptcy protection in September 2002.

After its demise, several free sites emerged in its place, while the music industry struggled with different business models and generally regarded the technology industry with a mixture of fear and contempt. But Apple’s iTunes marked a turning point of sorts for both the music industry and the technology industry. The five largest music labels licensed their music to Apple on terms that were more liberal than ever before. The service is currently only available to Apple Macintosh users, who represent 3 per cent of the world’s PC users.

Roxio’s chief executive Chris Gorog welcomes the challenge. "If I were Apple, I would hate to compete with Napster. We have a larger catalogue of songs. Our service has more breadth. And there’s no brand more powerful than ours in online music."

Gorog declined to specify what his financial expectations were for the Napster service. "We ultimately expect Napster to be a substantial part of our overall business and ultimately overtake our core software business." He says it would spend $20 million on marketing before its launch.

Download songs on mobile phones

MUSIC giants Warner Music and Bertelsmann’s BMG introduced a new anti-piracy technology enabling music fans to download songs onto a mobile phone and share the music with friends. The new digital rights management (DRM) technology, called OMA DRM, was developed by three-year-old technology firm, Beep Science AS of Oslo, the companies said in a statement.

The technology works on the concept of restricted peer-to-peer network in which owners of mobile phones equipped with multimedia messaging, or MMS, can send and receive pictures and sound clips to and from other mobile phone users.

With OMA DRM, the music labels can collect revenues for each song downloaded off a central computer server and for those that are swapped between mobile phone users, said Jan Rune Hetle, chief executive of Beep Science. The emergence of MMS phones enables media companies to sell a variety of short media clips from songs to condensed sports highlight reels.

The moneymaking potential is fraught with uncertainty though. Music executives, for one, are desperate to keep tight controls on the exchange of songs between mobile phones.

Unsanctioned peer-to-peer networks on the Internet, including Kazaa and Grokster, have created a booming black market for free music, which the industry blames for contributing to a three-year decline in recorded music sales.

Rune Hetle said BMG and Warner Music are the first two major music labels to try the technology that is being deployed by 50 mobile phone operators across Europe, including Vodafone and Swisscom. The technology works with Nokia’s 6220 handset. "All big handset makers are expected to follow suit, including Siemens and Samsung," Rune Hetle said.