Who were these peoples of the Indus Valley who interacted and
traded with contemporary civilisations? Had they come from
outside or was their culture indigenous with roots in the
country? What did these urban people do for a living? What did
they manufacture and trade in? How did this magnificent
civilisation come to an end? Was it an unexplained catastrophe
or was it a changing climate that brought about a decline in
agricultural production? Did the advancing desert overwhelm the
cultivated areas?
These are riddles
that have remained mostly unsolved. Experts the world over are
trying to find acceptable explanations for the decline, rather
disappearance of this culture. This book by a well-known
anthropologist puts together all that is known about this
fascinating culture. He examines the economic, agricultural,
religious and artistic aspects of this ancient civilisation and
draws some startling conclusions.
He comes out with
theories that would upset scholars and writers of textbooks. His
first point of difference with the early writers is about how
these urban settlements were ruled. He asserts that this
civilisation was not ruled by any priest-kings. The image that
has been accepted as that of a priest-king, he says, has not
been correctly described. He maintains that there is no definite
evidence about the nature of the political set-up of this age
and finds it more reasonable to believe that they had a
corporate system of governance without kings or emperors.
He also contests
the theory that the high mounds at Mohenjo-daro and Harappa were
citadels and makes the point that the elevated area at
Mohenjo-daro has no fortification. But his most startling
observation is that what have all along been described as ’ at
Mohenjo-daro and Harappa, offer no evidence of being
grain-storage facilities. He describes them as warehouses.
On the question
who the Indus people were and what language they spoke, he
maintains that all of them were not dark-skinned Dravidians
though some of them might have been dark-skinned, given the hot
tropical environment of the area. As far as their language is
concerned, he finds it difficult to make a correct assessment on
the basis of archaeology alone, unaided by texts. He finds it
more reasonable to believe that the Indus people spoke many
languages, probably from different language families.
But the real
bombshell comes when he discusses the causes of the
disappearance of this civilisation without leaving any trace
behind. He hotly contests the theory of early historians that an
Aryan invasion destroyed the Indus civilisation. He finds no
evidence of an invasion and opines that the arrival of the
Aryans was more in the nature of a movement of cattle
pastoralists looking for pastureland for their cattle than a
military conquest. The Aryans, he points out, did not come to
Punjab in a rush as an invasion would require, but they came
over a long period, maybe centuries. He refuses to accept the
description of battles in the Rig Veda as evidence of the
sacking of the Indus civilisation. These battles, he maintains,
relate to life in ancient Punjab during the early Iron Age,
almost a millennium after the disappearance of the Indus
civilisation.
These and several
other explosive observations of the author, who has been
associated with excavations at many sites in the sub-continent
and has done extensive research on the Indus civilisation, make
this volume valuable for scholars, students and lay readers
alike. If anything, he makes the riddle of the Indus Age all the
more enigmatic.
|