The Tribune - Spectrum

ART & LITERATURE
'ART AND SOUL
BOOKS
MUSINGS
TIME OFF
YOUR OPTION
ENTERTAINMENT
BOLLYWOOD BHELPURI
TELEVISION
WIDE ANGLE
FITNESS
GARDEN LIFE
NATURE
SUGAR 'N' SPICE
CONSUMER ALERT
TRAVEL
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
CAPTION CONTEST
FEEDBACK

Sunday, July 27, 2003
Books

Bookmark
Remembering a humanist
Suresh Kohli

  Bhisham Sahni  IN the death of Bhisham Sahni we have lost the one writer who had been, almost effortlessly, carrying forward the Premchand legacy. One last met him about little over a month ago by design shortly after return from a shooting spell in Kashmir. He had looked and sounded visibly healthy. He had appeared his compassionate self on the phone. Death is, in any case, a silent stalker. He listened attentively, head bent but a little raised, to one's account of shooting in the Valley, and briefly recounted cherished moments of his own visits to Kashmir decades ago, bemoaning the fact that violence had torn into shreds happiness of a heavenly piece of land. He recollected, painfully though, the long forgotten tragedy of Comrade Maqbool Sherwani, a progressive who had been mercilessly gunned down by the Pathan invaders in 1948. A sensitive poet he had risen above socio-political, religious considerations, and fought to protect his land from the invaders. A warrior long forgotten by his people without even a memorial.

One had sent a brief note to Bhisham Sahni in April this year seeking his formal permission to include his widely hailed short story in a long delayed anthology of Indian stories that one had been in the process of editing. So strong and lingering had been the impact of the story Chief ki Dawat (A Dinner for the Boss) that one forgot when it had actually been written. Several translations of this story are available in different anthologies, though one feels Gillian Wright's effort makes the best reading. Chief ki Dawat is, indeed, an ageless work. An early Bhisham Sahni work (some critics in Hindi strongly contend that it is in his stories that the late writer's commitment to humanism is most palpable).

 


One had actually been trying to work on an anthology of somewhat later works, written in the sixties and the seventies. As was his wont, he was prompt in responding to the note on April 14, 2003. "My dear`85..Please excuse this hurried postcard. I have your letter of 8th April concerning your interest in a new anthology of Indian short stories and your desire to include my story Dinner for the Boss in it. You are welcome to include the story. But if you are looking for stories written during the seventies, then this is not the one, for it was written during early 50s. It is for you to decide`85." And when we met, on a surprisingly pleasant summer evening, in the lawns of India International Centre in New Delhi, and settled on another story, one of his favourite I guess, little did one realise that it would be our final encounter. We parted on the note of understanding that one would shortly visit for a longer overdue chat in his by then residence of a few years. One now only has memories of his West Delhi house. A place where he gave form to most of his writings.

He is one of the few writers who never published a single forgettable work. And though Mayyadas ki Maarhi (The Mansion) is his more ambitious and enduring work, he will be better remembered for his intense Partition saga Tamas because of Govind Nihalani's sensitive and competent television adaptation. One had reviewed Mayyadas ki Maarhi and found faults with his own translation, saying the English version had left a lot to be desired, had been in archaic language and style, even though he had been himself a university level English language teacher for over four decades. Another writer of his stature would have picked up cudgels against the reviewer, even sent a nasty rejoinder to the newspaper. But not Bhisham Sahni. He would have died of guilt and embarrassment even to bring up the subject. That could also be because of the security of the knowledge and confidence in his own capabilities.

Paeans can be written, and one is certain it would be so at least in Hindi, about Bhisham Sahni's charm and humility. Though both the coveted Bhartiya Jnanpith and Saraswati Samman eluded him, he never carried a grudge about it. During all the decades of knowing him, meeting him over a cup of tea or a drink, at seminars and literary get-togethers, one cannot recount a single incident when he might have lost his cool. He was never agitated, and appeared as cool as a cucumber. His stance was never rushed or hurried. Untouched by ego or rivalry in almost every matter, he would talk to a newcomer, and an unknown entity with as much attention as one would give to someone of his own stature, or above. Though for a writer of his accomplishments there almost seemed no one to look up to. Down, perhaps, yes.

In a writing span of nearly seven long decades, Bhisham Sahni published six novels, and also six full length plays of which Hanush and Madhavi are more famous, and over a hundred short stories that are obtained in ten collections, apart from a biography of his actor-brother, Balraj Sahni for the National Book Trust, My Brother, Balraj, a book that has run into several editions. One spoke to him at some length about Tamas, which had been included in the NBT's Aadaan-Pradaaan series, last year during the making of a bilingual documentary on the scheme. Though his response was elaborate, here are a few important bits of information, in his own words:

"There was no attempt in Tamas to weave a story around a character or a main incident or a series of incidents. It was an effort to show a human situation`85.The novel is episodic and it is these episodes that bring about the spectrum. There are characters whose future has been taken into account and most characters have actually been put not in a narrative context but in the context of their being members of a class, group, community and society as far as I could help it`85my essential concern has been the depiction of the situation of communal frenzy that gripped the West Punjab of pre-Partition days. I have shown how it affected the people as individuals, as members of a caste and a society`85while the whole novel is based on facts, the first chapter is the work of my imagination. I have never seen a pig being killed. I have never been to a piggery. Though I must admit that before I wrote the novel, I had a great desire to see a pig being killed, but the desire died out after I created the scene of the opening chapter."

One wishes one could go on. May be there will be another occasion.