After all, what is taking place here is human
growth; we can’t fence it. But, we definitely can provide for it to
take place in a regulated manner.
Whether the city should be allowed to grow
further in spatial terms or not is now no more an issue. That, in any
case, is happening. If we allow this to carry on, it would not be
possible to make a plan later, least of all implement it. These
pockmarks on the beautiful face would remain. Rather than allow these as
random eruptions, let them come up as planned beauty spots.
We have had a few
instances of planned expansion across the periphery area. Panchkula, SAS
Nagar, cantonment, etc., have served a definite purpose. Though a
macro-level lack of planning may be pointed out. They came up
independent of each other. It would be better if future satellite towns
coordinated with all the players in the region. Today, commuting between
these towns, for example, is cumbersome.
Slums, a bane of urban
development, play their part in Chandigarh too. The slum-dwellers are
usually treated as something to get rid of and their abodes an eyesore.
But the fact remains that the "planned" citizenry pays them to
stay here. The interest is mutual. Like it or not, unskilled labour is
the engine of our economies, and their legitimate needs have to be
catered to. As things stands today, they are just pushed around, forced
to be an "eyesore."
Immigration of all kinds
of people is likely to continue. And that’s welcome, for it indicates
the city is desirable, and, thus, alive.
The middle class, which
incidentally makes for the flesh of the city, has a common complaint. It
finds living here unaffordable in terms of rent and land cost. Sandeep
Chouhan, a young entrepreneur running an IT start-up, found it too
expensive to operate from within the city. While he is getting business,
yet he found it better to shift his office to the outskirts. Residents
feel that while their incomes are those of a small city, the rents are
metropolitan—a mismatch.The source of all this trouble seems to be a
lack of legitimate scope for expansion.
Where to now?
The mother planners of the
city provided for a legislation to check unplanned growth around the
periphery of the city. The core city itself seems to have run out of
space; otherwise why would people of all hues, from labourers to retired
bureaucrats, indulge in illegitimate construction in violation of the
Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act. They are not criminals, just
ordinary citizens trying to meet their legitimate needs, albeit in
violation of the law.
M. Ramsekhar, a bureaucrat
with experience in urban development who has just completed his
four-year tenure as Deputy Commissioner of the city, points out that the
Act does not inhibit growth per se; it is only against unplanned
growth. The governments concerned can always make proper town plans and
have them duly sanctioned.
No law can be kept frozen
for all times, he feels. There has to be dynamism in the laws that
govern a city. Our modes of living change, and laws have to be adapted
accordingly, striking a balance between individual freedom and ordered
living. This very Act can actually provide for regulated expansion.
Then why do the powers
that be not make plans and let the city grow? Well, one can’t ask a
bureaucrat that; vectors of power and politics have to be understood for
that. But residents can definitely make a cry for an opportunity to make
the city grow under a "greater" masterplan.
Says Ramsekhar, any plan
has to provide for a meaningful existence for all residents. Which means
all aspects of life, like income and individual growth, and not just a
clean living space.
Why no one has made a move
on making further plans is probably because that is just where all the
troubles and challenges begin. For all the competence that Le Corbusier
may have had and all the pains he took, he’s had his share of
criticism. But that should not dissuade us, the body of citizens and
administrators as a whole. Any expansion plan made in sincerity would be
better than no plan, which is the case right now.
Rajvinder Singh Bains, a
resident of long and a lawyer, feels whatever the plan, we must ensure
that the city does not lose its livability, which is its most prominent
asset. And this is borne out by a host of independent surveys that have
declared the city among the most livable places. We even see people from
cities like Ludhiana shifting to Chandigarh while carrying on their
industries in Ludhiana.
The building of towns, big
or small, from scratch is a costly proposition a poor country like ours
can ill-afford, he feels. "Why not improve our existing villages
and townships, using modern principles of town planning in rhyme with
their natural layouts?" These could all be made well-connected and
attractive, given their greener environment. Also, it would save money
in terms of drainage, etc, as we would only have to improve existing
infrastructure; no land acquisitions either. There would also be no wild
experimenting in terms of planning.
As regards the expansion
of the core city, there cannot be many alternatives, for it has
necessarily to extend the existing grid. If architects and town planners
can come up with improvements on that, it will be that much better.
Only one thing needs to be
kept in mind. The principle of a breathing city should not be lost. We
could maintain "lungs" at intervals in the expansion plan.
Ramsekhar also feels that
the trend of the upper class moving out to greener suburbs could soon
catch on in India too. It only needs promotion in terms of better
connectivity to city centres. This could free a lot of property in the
cities. Up to 80 per cent of the land is used by 20 per cent of the
people. But the trouble is even the 20 per cent left for the rest is not
optimally utilised, which needs attention from town planners. It is the
Administration’s job to ensure everyone finds a spot in the sun.
Challenges
The first obstacle to any
expansion plan is the clash of interest that exists among the residents
themselves. The early birds do not want late arrivals to vie for the
juicy bits. Expansion would mean Chandigarh being described as something
more than the Capitol Complex, PGI, and the cremation ground. This would
"spoil the immaculate conception" for them.
Ramsekhar feels a major
aspect missing in development plans is regional planning. All
administrations concerned have to work on evolving a functional
coordinating body—something on the principles of the National Capital
region (NCR), though even that is not working ideally.
In making rehabilitation
plans for the poorer sections, which have drawn criticism in Chandigarh
for encouraging slums, he would want that those who benefit should have
a stake in the city. At the same time, the Administration should not
seem like a soft state, being made a fool of.
While he’s not opposed
to expansion, he would like it to be under a detailed plan, which is,
more importantly, implemented strictly. So far, the Periphery Act has
served its purpose, but only to an extent. More teeth are needed. The
best of plans would be worth nothing if their bylaws are not
implemented.
Expansions usually have
meant acquisition of land. Earlier, such exercises have led to a lot of
heartburn. Plans on making "new Chandigarhs" have fallen
through most of the times on charges of unjust profiteering. Whatever
the plan, says Bains, it should be made public long in advance and
should be stuck to. Acquisitions, however, will have to be made, feels
Ramsekhar, for private developers will not work for the poor. Though
Bains would have it that the government should only act as a
facilitator, making mandatory provisions for the poor, where necessary,
while allowing private developers to work under a masterplan. Certain
new areas developed in Ludhiana by private enterprise have come up
neatly, and without much dispute with the original landowners, who stood
to gain. Angrez Singh, president of the Pind Bachao Action Committee,
Badheri, Chandigarh, says people whose lands are acquired should be
offered equitable gains, whether in the form of money or land.
One major problem to be
contended with, of course, is lack of political will or political will
working in a wrong direction. Politicians have the potential of
misleading people and obstructing bureaucrats. But the people of
Chandigarh are among the more aware in the country; hopefully they would
lead their politicians positively!
A dream
Plans may be functional,
but ideals should always be lofty. Implementing an NCR (Delhi) kind of
idea, the region could develop towns like Patiala, Ambala, Ropar,
Parwanoo, and all areas that fall in between to draw a synergy for
growth. There’s no doubt that all neighbouring states stand to gain
from the satellite towns, so there is no point in any state not
cooperating.
All these spots of growth
could have connecting highways, both asphalt and cyber. Moving across
the network, a common man should not feel the hindrances and hurdles
associated with crossing state borders. After all, if the European Union
could do it, why not states of one country.
As for economic growth,
rather than experiment, the city could further promote tested fields
like education, research, tourism and the IT sector, instead of
conventional industry.
To complete the dream, it
would be nice to have a representation of all states (a la foreign
missions) in the only possible metropolis of the region.
This way or that, it’s
the beauty and spirit of the city under threat. Urgency in action is the
need.
|