Sunday, January 5, 2003
Special Issue
Countering
terrorism
Views of eminent experts and thinkers on
countering terrorism
Hari Jaisingh
Kanti
Bajpai
Asghar
Ali Engineer
Owen Bennett Jones
Shelley Walia
G.
Parthasarthy
T.
V. Rajeswar
Gen V N Sharma
Ashok
K. Mehta
Prakash
Singh
M. J. Akbar
|
Dynamic
democracy is the answer
Hari Jaisingh
CAN democratic regimes
withstand the onslaught of deadly terrorist activities that derive
sustenance from the well-focussed forces of Islamic fundamentalism? The
question is wide open as the world's two major democracies—the USA and
India—along with a few European countries are under tremendous threats
from the Osama bin Laden brigade operating globally and secretly.
Roots of terrorism
OVER the last few years
there has been a polarisation of the debate on terrorism — in the
agencies of the government and in public life. Two basic points of view
— a liberal and a conservative — have been vying for supremacy, as
India has grappled with militancy in Punjab, Kashmir, and the Northeast.
Are these two viewpoints the best way to think about the causes of
terrorism? Do we as ordinary citizens have any role to play in
containing terrorist violence, asks Kanti
Bajpai.
Fundamentalism & terrorism
Politics of religion and religion as politics
|
COMMUNALISM
is all about political or economic interests of a particular community,
while fundamentalism is enforcement of sectarianism for the political
mobilisation of a community with the aim of achieving the power-goals of
its elite.
|
Fundamentalism invariably leads to terrorism, says Asghar
Ali Engineer.
|
Pakistan: Eye of the storm
EVER since its creation, Pakistan has grappled with the issue of what role Islam should play in the state. Most Pakistanis do not want to live in a theocracy: they want their country to be moderate, modern, tolerant and stable, writes
Owen Bennett Jones.
|