Tuesday, July 23, 2002, Chandigarh, India





THE TRIBUNE SPECIALS
50 YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE

TERCENTENARY CELEBRATIONS
M A I N   N E W S

‘Transfer PPSC scam to CBI’
HC notice of motion to Punjab on PIL
Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, July 22
Acting on a petition filed by an advocate seeking the transfer of the Punjab Public Service Commission recruitment scam to the Central Bureau of Investigation, Mr Justice G.S. Singhvi and Ms Justice Kiran Anand Lall of the Punjab and Haryana High Court today issued notice of motion to the state of Punjab, the Home Secretary, the Director General of Police and two other respondents for August 5. The Judges also directed that the record pertaining to the transfers should be produced in the court.

Claiming that the state was involved in “operation cover-up”, advocate Rupinder Khosla, in his petition, claimed that the transfer of officers belonging to the intelligence wing in the middle of the investigations “may have been done to thwart the probe”. Giving details, he asserted: “So far as the strategy of emasculating the intelligence wing was concerned, the coup de grace was delivered when its head Additional Director-General of Police (intelligence) A.P. Bhatnagar, along with three colleagues was unceremoniously shunted out”.

He added: “It was this team that nabbed the PPSC Chairman and later unearthed crores of bribe-money collected by him. Transferring them in the middle of the case would no doubt affect the case. But what is more serious is the fact that the High Court Chief Justice had specially asked the particular officer to assist him in the probe against some judges alleged to be involved in the scam. Even more serious is the statement made by Mr Bhatnagar and widely reported in the press that an amount of Rs 2 crore out of the money lying in the lockers of chairman Ravinderpal Singh Sidhu stood unaccounted for and the same was most probably used to influence higher-ups”.

Arguing in person, he submitted that the scam was not being properly handled by the investigating agency and the police was not being permitted to perform its statutory duty of apprehending criminals and bringing them to justice. “Certain prime witnesses were allowed to flee the country after siphoning off a substantial amount of money from their lockers. Certain other witnesses were made to retract from their earlier statements. Besides this, the challans were not properly put up on time. Some high officers were allowed to go scot free whereas certain others were targeted. All in all, the feeling of the general public, including the present petitioner, was that it was being deliberately allowed to go by”, the petitioner submitted.  
Back

Home | Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial |
|
Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune
50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations |
|
122 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail |