Thursday,
May 2, 2002, Chandigarh, India
|
Analysis New Delhi, May 1 TDP supremo Chandrababu Naidu said the party was not happy with Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee's response and abstained from voting after the party made four specific demands that included Mr Modi's replacement. The TDP would "continue to fight on issues" and mount pressure on the Centre for Mr Modi's removal, Mr Naidu said in Hyderabad. The government, which won the trial of strength comfortably by a margin of 94 votes, said the entire exercise only helped in scoring political points. Samajwadi Party leader Mulayam Singh Yadav said the Opposition had succeeded in developing cracks within the ruling NDA at the Centre. Asked whether his party's relationship with the BJP would remain the same, Mr Naidu said: “We are fighting on issues. It will continue”, indicating that there would be no change in the present status of “issue-based outside support” to the Central coalition. On what prompted the TDP to boycott voting, he said: “We decided to boycott because we were not happy with Prime Minister's response to our demands”. “Some parties are trying to politicise the Gujarat issue and many parties have changed their attitude several times. But we are consistent. We are interested in the issue and have been asking for change of leadership in the interest of the nation”, the Chief Minister said.
PTI |
Naidu’s stance a political compulsion New Delhi, May 1 Mr Naidu had telephoned Mr Vajpayee yesterday and assured him that he had no intention of destabilising or rocking the BJP-led NDA government. At the same time, he explained that he had his own political compulsions and could not allow the TDP’s main rival — the Congress — to wean away the minorities in Andhra Pradesh. After having taken a stand at his party’s politburo meeting without leaving any escape route, Mr Naidu is now having to work overtime in sticking to the high moral ground of seeing the sack of Mr Narendra Modi as the Chief Minister of Gujarat. This was evident from Mr Naidu’s press conference in Hyderabad today where he stated that the TDP was unhappy with Mr Vajpayee’s response in the Lok Sabha in the wee hours as it did not meet its primary demand of Mr Narendra Modi being sacked. Mr Naidu has reaffirmed that despite the fissures that have developed with the BJP, the TDP is not giving up the present arrangement of supporting the Vajpayee government from outside. The Chief Minister realises the delicate situation that he is in on account of the poor financial health of Andhra Pradesh. He believes like the Central leadership that the heat and dust created by the communal carnage in Gujarat since the Godhra incident will die out in the next few months, thanks to public memory being short. At no point during the marathon debate in the Lok Sabha on the Opposition censure motion did the TDP give the slightest inkling that it was in sync with the Congress or any other Opposition party. It is because of this approach adopted by the TDP that the Prime Minister’s effort to send a singular message from the presiding officer of the Lok Sabha to the people of Gujarat to promote and strengthen the forces of communal harmony came a cropper. At this juncture, TDP parliamentary party leader Yerran Naidu got up and announced that the TDP members were staging a walkout in protest against the Prime Minister’s reponse. In the opinion of the TDP supremo, it may have sent a proper message to the people at large in Andhra Pradesh but the desire of certain senior party leaders to send a united and strong signal from the Lok Sabha proved to be an exercise in futility. Mr Vajpayee is also aware of the compulsions of Dr Farooq Abdullah’s National Conference, which abstained from voting on the Gujarat debate, as also Mamata Banerjee’s Trinamool Congress, which voted with the NDA government but did not lag behind in lambasting the Centre for its inaction and continuing with Mr Narendra Modi as the Chief Minister of Gujarat. “These are the compulsions of coalition politics and the Prime Minister is abreast with the political predilections of each of the constituents of the NDA,” an aide of Mr Vajpayee said as a matter of fact. He conceded that it would have been too much to expect the National Conference to vote with the Vajpayee government, especially when the Assembly elections in Jammu and Kashmir are barely six months away. It is for these reasons that Mr Vajpayee refused to accept the resignation of the Union Minister of State for External Affairs, Mr Omar Abdullah. On his part, Mr Omar Abdullah had offered to resign as he felt it was untenable for him as a minister to abstain during the voting on the Opposition’s censure motion. |
Modi dares opponents Ahmedabad, May 1 Invoking the name of Atal Behari Vajpayee, a defiant Modi also lashed out at the Opposition for firing its salvos at the Prime Minister by exploiting the situation in Gujarat.
PTI |
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 122 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |