AGRICULTURE TRIBUNE | Monday, April 22, 2002, Chandigarh, India |
Nefarious pest of rapeseed-mustard Feasible alternative to synthetic pesticides ‘Follow sanitary practices for safer milk’ Diversification: is it as simple as it sounds? |
|
Nefarious pest of rapeseed-mustard Rapeseed-mustard is one of the important
oleferous crops and constitutes the major source of edible oil for
human consumption and cake for animals. Every effort is being made to
increase the productivity of this crop by adopting improved package of
practices such as use of high-yielding varieties, optimum use of
fertilisers, irrigation and plant protection measures in order to meet
the growing demand of oils. Thirtyeight insect-pests are known to be
associated with different stages of the rapeseed-mustard crop in
India. The mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.), is the key past in
the rapeseed-mustard growing areas. Yield losses due to this pest vary
with the variety, agro-technological practices and the environmental
factors. However, it is known to cause yield losses up to 42 per cent
under different agro-ecological conditions. The damage is caused by
nymphs and adults which are louse-like, pale, greenish insects. They
are seen feeding in large numbers, often covering the entire surface
of flower buds, shoots, pods etc. This insect is most abundant from
December to March when it infests various cruciferous oilseeds and
vegetables. During summer, it is believed to emigrate to the hills and
there is some evidence that aphids also survive on abandoned stray
plants of cabbage and on cruciferous weeds in the plains. The pest
breed parthenogenetically and the females give birth to 26 to 133
nymphs. They grow very fast and are full-fed in seven to 10 days.
About 45 generations are completed in a year. Cloudy and cold weather
(20° C or below) is very favourable for the multiplication of this
pest. Both the nymphs and adults suck cell-sap from leaves, stems,
inflorescence or the developing pods. Due to very high population of
the pest, the vitality of plant is greatly reduced. The leaves acquire
early appearance, the flowers fail to form pods and the developing
pods do not produce healthy seeds. The yield of an infested crop is
reduced to one-fourth or one-fifth. Prevention: — Raya
varieties Varuna, RCC4, T-6342, RC-199 and RH-7846 were found tolerant
to the mustard aphid attack as against brown sarson variety BSH-1,
Gobhi sarson variety HPN-1 and yellow sarson variety YST-841. — The
lines/genotypes possessing phenotypic characters like apetalous white
flower, glossy stem and leaves and purple leaf colour in B. Juncea (L)
provided initial resistance to mustard aphid, but turned into
susceptibility under severe aphid pressure at the later stage of crop
growth. — Early sowing fist fortnight escaped aphid infestation
without any appreciable yield loss as compared to the late-sown
crop. — Sowing in rows 30 cm or 45 cm apart with a plant space of
10 to 15 cm is found to minimise the incidence of pest. — Removal
of aphid infested twigs from the fields in the first week of January
can save the cost of one to two insecticidal sprays. — The economic
threshold level of mustard aphid incidence worked out to be nine to 10
aphids on central twig/plant on 10 per cent of the plants. Hence it is
recommended that the crop be sprayed with exydemeton methyl (0.025 per
cent) or dimethoata (0.03 per cent) or phosphamidon (0.025 per cent)
in afternoon to avoid mortality of pollinators and predators. — The
appearance of predators coccinella septempunctata linnaeus and
parasite and diaeretiella rapae (curtis) during February resulted in
sharp decline of the mustard aphid. — Rains of light intensity in
January and up to mid-February resulted in the population build-up of
mustard aphid while the rains in the last week of February or March
had adverse effect on the population of pest. |
Feasible alternative to synthetic pesticides Insect-pests cause
considerable damage to agricultural crops. A number of chemical
insecticides have been developed and are being effectively used to
control noxious insect populations. The continuous use of these
synthetic insecticides causes increasing problems for human health and
to the environment. Now, it is widely realised that insecticides thus
developed exert immediate side-effects and sometimes long-term
indirect effects on living organisms and environment. Potential
insecticide e.g. DDT that once proved effective in controlling many
species of pests was found to persist in the environment for 15 to 20
years and accumulate at an alarming concentration through food chains.
As a consequence in North America, many species of birds were severely
depopulated. Further, many of the targeted insects have become
resistant to a majority of insecticides. As a result, more number of
sprays with higher concentrations had to be applied to control the
insect-pests of different crops. In addition, due to non-selectivity
beneficial species are also killed. In view of above abuses of
insecticide use, alternative means of controlling harmful insects have
been felt. Naturally produced insecticides by plants or
micro-organisms could prove effective substitutes which are feasible
and economical also. In addition, these compounds are highly specific
for a target insect species, biodegradable and slow to select for
resistance. Mention can be made of bacterium Baccillus thuringiensis
(Bt). At present, 90 per cent of bioinsecticides used, take the
advantage of the insecticidal properties of Bt. This bacterium
comprises a number of strains, each of which produces different toxin
that can kill certain specific insects. For instance one of the
strains being toxic to American bollworm and another control
mosquitoes and black flies. Bt’s mode of action: Unlike
most of synthetic chemical insecticides, Bt toxins are not contact
poisons, they must be eaten to be toxic. These are consumed by the
insects while feeding on the leaves. Toxin binds itself to the
receptors present in insect’s mid gut, thereby leading to paralysis
followed by death of the insect. This happens only in an alkaline
medium. So we, with our acidic guts, do not need to worry. Bt toxins
can be used for protecting crop plants by two ways — insecticidal
sprays and transgenic (Bt) plants. Insecticidal sprays: The
Bt has been used to produce biological insecticides for foliar
application for over 50 years. These products were, and are still,
produced by fermentation of single Bt strains in crude, inexpensive
media. The most common formulations include wettable powders, or
dispersible granules but oil and aqueous-flowable preparations have
also been produced. Despite numerous merits of biological
insecticides, their use is still limited due to their low field
remanence. Indeed, the toxins are rapidly degraded by solar UV
conferring short-term protection and requiring frequent sprayings.
However, these inherent disadvantages can be overcome by developing
plants with inbuilt Bt gene (Transgenic plants). Transgenic (Bt)
plants: To make plants resistant to insects, take the Bt gene and
put it in the plant. Plants expressing these toxic genes (which could
as such be considered "plant pesticides" have several
advantages over classical chemical means in plant protection. Borers,
for example, are difficult to reach by conventional means once they
have penetrated plant tissues. Since, toxin expression can be achieved
throughout the whole plant during the entire lifecycle, the deployment
of transgenic plants would allow the control of major insect-pests.
Furthermore, pests are exposed to the toxins at their most sensitive
stages (early larval instars) and conversely, plants can be protected
when they are most sensitive to insect attack. Such transgenic plants
have proved more effective to control insects that have developed
resistance to chemical insecticides such as American bollworm, the
most destructive pest of cotton. The active compound is maintained in
the plant tissues and has the potential of lowering cost of sprays.
Finally, due to their selectivity and other advantages, transgenic
plants expressing Bt toxin genes can easily be integrated in an
integrated pest management (IPM) scheme. The Bt gene has been
transferred to impart resistance in several major crops like cotton,
maize, rice, potato, tomato, tobacco, etc. Bt cotton and Bt corn have
been commercialised in the USA, Canada and Australia. Bt cotton in the
USA resulted in insecticide savings as high as $ 60 to $ 120 per acre.
In the USA, more than 10 million acres of transgenic-insect resistant
crops, including cotton, corn and potatoes, were planted in 1999 and
are on the verge of extensive plantings. however, at present,
insect-resistant transgenic crops have not been released in India. It
is now a established fact that Bt crops are environmental friendly,
non-toxic for mammals and effective in controlling the specific
insect-pests unlike hazardous synthtic pesticides. In view of this
discussion, it is, therefore, imperative to test their efficiency
against pest which are otherwise difficult to control. Resently, the
Indian Government has given "biosafety clearance" to the
controversial genetically engineered cotton developed by multinational
Monsanto for large-scale cultivation and marketing. Bt cotton would
help farmers save money they currently spend on chemical pesticides. |
‘Follow sanitary practices for safer milk’ After the Green Revolution, Punjab has successfully
moved towards White Revolution by producing the highest per capita
milk in the country, but the dairy experts of the Punjab Agricultural
University (PAU), Ludhiana, have warned the policy makers and the milk
producers that unless sanitary practices and judicious use of
pesticides are followed by milk producers and farmers, the future of
this sector is highly questionable. They have cautioned that it is
not the animal rights activists like Ms Maneka Gandhi, but the
presence of aflatoxins, particles of the DDT, the HCH and other
harmful insecticides above permissible limits found in the milk
produced in the state which would affect the demand for milk and milk
products in the domestic and international markets. In fact, recent
studies conducted by the Department of Veterinary Microbiology and
Veterinary Public Health have found that more than 50 per cent of the
samples of milk taken from Ludhiana and its surrounding areas were
contaminated due to the presence of these particles. They have
recommended simple sanitary practices and judicious use of pesticides
to enhance the quality of milk. A study conducted by the Department
of Veterinary Microbiology has found that most of the milk produced in
the region is contaminated by highly toxic aflatoxins — produced by
the fungus present in low quality animal feed — which can cause
liver damage, cancer and suppression of the immune system. The study
has observed that aflatoxin is indeed found in milk and milk products
even in the developed countries like the USA, Germany, the Netherlands
and the UK, but in much lower quantity. It has revealed that out of
125 samples of milk and milk products taken from rural and urban
areas, more than 50 per cent samples had up to 500 ppt per litre
aflatoxin as compared to 10 ppt per litre found in Switzerland. The
experts warn that aflatoxin is only partially affected by
pasteurisation, sterilisation or processing into cheese, butter, burfi,
khoa or paneer. They said that indiscriminatory use of anti-biotic by
the farmers over the years has also resulted into passing of their
residues to the animal milk. The contaminated feed, especially the
readymade one, prepared by some dubious companies in the region, has
badly affected the quality of milk. The problem is aggravated in the
rainy season, from July to September, due to high humidity in the
weather, they say. Another recent study conducted by Dr JPS Gill,
Department of Veterinary Public Health, PAU, has also observed that
though DDT has been banned in the state, its particles are still found
in the animal milk, much more than the safer limits recommended by the
World Health Organisation (WHO). Elaborating the process of
contamination, Dr Gill, says,‘‘ The overuse of the DDT to check
malaria till recently, and now indiscriminate use of pesticides like
the HCH and other organochlorine over different crops especially
cotton result in accumulation of their residues in the final produce.
Later the fodder and oilcakes used for animal feed often result in
accumulation of their residues in the animal fat and muscles, and are
finally transferred to milk. The presence of these harmful particles
has been found in more than 85 per cent of the samples.’’ He
admits that these particles are also found in developed countries as
well, but within safe limits. In the long run, the consumers can be
afflicted by various diseases like breast cancer, decrease in
immunity, etc. Dr S.K. Jand, Professor of Bacteriology, Department of
Veterinary Microbiology, PAU, has also done extensive work on the
regulation of aflatoxins in dairy products. He says, ‘‘We should
not be panicked over this matter since the situation could be easily
controlled by following sanitary practices and judicious use of
pesticides by the farmers. There is a need to create mass awareness
among the farmers about its effects on consumer health, and export of
milk and milk products.’’ Incidentally, the Milkfed has already
started a pilot project to promote sanitary practices among commercial
dairy farmers in the state. It has started showing some positive
results, claimed the officials at the Verka Milk Plant in Ludhiana. |
Diversification: is it as simple as it sounds? Punjab has a new government installed.
Excitement is writ large on the new incumbents’ faces and there is a
lot of enthusiasm being portrayed to get Punjab prosper again.
Diversification remains the keyword amongst the top policy makers in
Punjab. Somehow the articulation ignores one simple question? What
does the government actually mean when it uses the term
diversification? Does the word simply mean shifting from one crop to
another or does the diction have substance attached to it? Is the
process as simple as it is made to sounds? If not then what would be
the measures taken to bring about a positive change in the once
prosperous agriculture economy of Punjab? Diversification would
involve a very meticulous approach starting from the point of
sincerity that enables a clear direction to the bureaucracy, the
agriculture university, the departments concerned and the farmer. In
my opinion at the first instance, it would be the renewal of the lost
trust between the government and the farming community that would be
imperative to the success of whole process of diversification. The
word diversification as it is known to all and sundry can be heard and
read in every seminar or newspaper. It is in every economist’s armor
but yet the paradigm. But yet there is no concrete step that can be
termed as a step towards diversification. Rather there are
challenges. — Have we identified which areas in agriculture we want
to diversify in. If yes, then which part of Punjab needs to start
diversifying at the earliest, for everybody does not need to change?
We need to change one-third of the cropping pattern. — Is it
oilseeds, agro forestry, dairy farming, aquaculture or horticulture
that we have identified? — If it is horticulture then is it
vegetables or fruits? — If fruits then what kind of a long-term
strategy are we looking at in terms of infrastructure, post-harvest
management and, most importantly, marketing of the produce. — What
kind of a timeframe are we looking at when we would be able to say
that Punjab’s agri-economy is cosmopolitan? — Is the plan WTO
friendly? When I use the term WTO friendly I mean the competitiveness
of Punjab’s agriculture vis-a-vis international guidelines and
secondly, it should be within the legal framework as laid down by the
WTO secretariat. — Are we ready to initiate land reforms to make
agriculture a viable enterprise? — With small land holdings and
very low incomes, will our farmers dare to diversify? — In the
absence of a strong economic package and a marketing back-up, do we
think farmers would be in a shape to diversify? No wonder we want to
use the easy way out by paying the farmer to keep his land barren. But
still if the suggestion seems to be the best plausible answer then
what is the hitch of implementing it. Go ahead and implement it. One
has serious doubts whether we have a strategy in place to counter this
bundle of questions that accumulate everyday. Attention is drawn not
only to the serious crisis in the political will to respond to the
momentous problem of surplus foodgrains but to the different stances
taken by different political parties when in opposition or in power,
respectively. During the last procurement season for paddy, the
Congress, which is the ruling party now, was quite convinced that the
Akalis would not be able to get the farmers’ paddy procured, thus,
resulting in a great political advantage. Today, the Akalis have
pinned their hopes on inadequate procurement of wheat. With such
political stances can we hope of a long-term solution? Is the
political jugglery limited to foodgrain procurement and not beyond? In
the end the only suggestion that comes to my mind is that we need to
derive one simple conclusion from the crisis "where there is
political will there is a way." |
|
Farm operations for April Ornamentals Annuals
The borders and beds intended to be used
for summer flowering annuals should be cleaned and prepared for the
purpose. As soon as the summer flower seedlings e.g. cosmos,
gaillaridia, comphetrena, cochia, zinnia, etc. are ready, they may be
transplanted in the above noted well prepared beds. Transplanting work
may preferably be carried out in the evening followed by water. Seed
should be collected from the already selected winter flowering
annuals. After proper drying and cleaning, the same may be stored for
the next season. Permanent plants Pruning and training of
permanent trees, shrubs and creepers, if found, may be carried out
wherever required, liberal quantity of manure may be spread around the
plants and mixed well in the soil. Keep irrigating these plants
regularly. Do not allow the weeds to grow around them. Cannas will be
at their best and should now be selected for propagation purpose. If
the cuttings of shrubs are not sown so far, the same be sown early
this month. ChrysanthemumIn the case of large-flowered chrysanthemum, encourage the growth in beds by regular watering. In pots, limit the watering to check the growth. In the case of small-flowered chrysanthemum. branching may be encouraged by pinching back to 10 cm from the ground. RosesMajor flowering of the rose will be over in this month. Keep removing the faded flowers and suckers from the root stock. Timely watering, weeding and hoeing will keep the plants in good conditions. LawnsFor having lush green lawns, their timely watering and frequent mowing is very important. Irrigation of lawns through sprinklers is the best for getting excellent results. If the growth of the grass is poor, a light dose of nitrogenous fertiliser may be given. Pot plantsFoliage plants in pots will have resumed activity. The delicate ones should be moved away from the positions exposed to the direct sun. Bulbous plantsThe bulbs of "nargis" and "gladiolie" which have become dormant and their leaves are dried up, the same may be taken out from the soil, cleaned, treated with some fungicide, dry them and then store in some cool dry place. The bulbs of calediums and "football lilly" may be planted, if not planted last month. Horticultural operationsIt is the month marked with a lot of change in weather. The temperature rises rapidly and humidity gets low. The growers are advised to adopt the measures to save their valuable fruit trees from drought, windstorm and sun injury. Whitewash the trunk, provide shelter to young trees and give frequent irrigation. The heavy bearing cultivars of peaches like Shan-e-Punjab and of plum like Kala Amritsari and Sutlej Purple normally need thinning in early days of the month to minimise the danger of limbbreakage and to improve the marketable size and quality of the fruits. Apply second dose of inorganic fertilisers to the fruit trees of citrus, pear litchi, plum, grapes etc. The stock sprouts emerging from the newly planted fruits below the bud union should be removed/pinched off regularly. In young orchards sathi moong can be sown in the last week of April. To check pathological fruit drop in citrus give one spray of 2: 2:250 Bordeaux mixture during the month. To check zinc deficiency in citrus, spray the affected trees with 0.3% zinc sulphate solution, without addition of lime, to spring flush in April. In order to get only winter seasons guava crop, spray urea 10% during April-May when maximum flowers have opened. also withhold irrigation during this period. Spray 625 ml of Nuvacron 36 SL (monocrotophos) or 670 ml of Rogor 30 EC (dimethoate) in 500 litres of water on citrus crop to control citrus psylla. To check insect-pests and diseases in grapes, spray 500 ml Nuvacron, Bavistan 400 litres of water for controlling anthracnose and belytan 40 g in 100 litres of water for the control of powdery mildew and Bavistin @ 400 g/400 litres of water for controlling anthracnose. In ber, spray 250 ml of Rogor or 100 ml dimecron in 250 litres of water for the control of lac insect. To check peach leaf curl causing aphids early in the month. Spray 500 ml rogor in 500 litres of water. Fodders— For early kharif fodders, sowing of bajra, maize, cowpea, etc may be carried out after harvesting of rabi crops. Cowpea is a very quick growing leguminous fodder which can be sown in mixture with maize or bajra. — Berseem crop for seed production should be frequently irrigated. Kashni and other weeds should be rogued out of the crop meant for seed production. — Gram catterpillar attacks the berseem crop for seed. Spray 500 ml of Thiodon 35 EC in 100 litres of water/acre at the irrigation of flowers. Repeat after 10 days, if necessary. — Stop irrigation to lucerne after full blossoming to arrest further vegetative growth for better seed production. — Cultivate perennial fodder on some area. For this purpose, guinea grass and napier bajra can be sown in April. Progressive Farming, PAU |