Wednesday,
February 27, 2002, Chandigarh, India
|
CIA chief rushing to Pak
on Osama hunt New Delhi, February 26 Mr Tenet’s Pakistan visit is fraught with immense operational and strategic significance, well-placed sources here told The Tribune today. During his visit, Mr Tenet will hold discussions with President Pervez Musharraf and the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) chief, Lt-Gen Ehsan-ul-Haq regarding the capture of Bin Laden, the brutal killing of US reporter Daniel Pearl and the extradition or deportation of notorious terrorist and the Jaish-e-Mohammad’s top leader Omar Sheikh, besides the overall situation regarding the curbing of terrorism in Pakistan.
|
New approach to Indo-Afghan relations
MR
Hamid Karzai, Prime Minister of the interim government in Afghanistan,
has concluded his delegation’s five-day visit to Teheran and is now
in New Delhi. He is heading a strong delegation of 24 members,
including 11 ministers. During his two-day visit to New Delhi, he will
be meeting the Prime Minister and also some Indian business tycoons. Soon after assuming the leadership of the coalition government, Mr Karzai undertook visits to major capitals of the world. In particular, his participation in the Tokyo meet was of much significance since that meeting was specifically organised to pool funding for reconstructing Afghanistan. As such, Mr Karzai is moving in the right direction because without massive foreign assistance, Afghanistan cannot heal its fractured economy. Therefore, Mr Karzai knows where the stability of his government lies. Of course, he has received encouraging response from almost all major capitals he has visited. Mr
Karzai visited Pakistan and held important and meaningful talks with
General Musharraf. Obviously, Pakistan remains an important neighbour
for Kabul, and has played an important role in the events of the
recent past in the region. Karzai’s diplomatic posture in conducting
his talks with the Pakistani counterpart is an indicator of how deftly
he wants to handle the complicated affairs of his state. He has
acknowledged the role of Pakistan in assisting the Afghans to beat
back the Soviet invasion of 1979 and has also expressed his gratitude
to Pakistan for having fended for nearly three million Afghan
refugees. Both the statements are facts of history. However, the
Afghan dignitary carefully circumvented the negative role of Pakistan
in Afghanistan and her ambition of carving “strategic depth” for
herself. These are somewhat irritating issues and it is better to
brush them under the carpet. Mr Karzai’s visit to Teheran has been
undertaken in the background of somewhat disturbing circumstances.
Washington has characterised Iran as one in the “axis of evil”.
Washington has accused Iran of facilitating the escape of Al-Qaeda
activists from Afghanistan and providing them shelter in her
territory, of providing arms and support to the Taliban remnants in
and around Kandahar and of abetting resurgence of Taliban insurgency
against the interim government of Hamid Karzai. This was by no means
an atmosphere conducive for Hamid Karzai to lead his delegation to
Iran and conduct business with an important neighbour. But reports
emanating from Teheran suggest that he has handled the visit with
utmost political skill and acumen so that neither the Americans are
annoyed nor are the Iranians confronted. It is remarkable to note that
Mr Karzai’s delegation to Iran included the son of Ismael Khan, the
Governor of Heat, the one who is suspected by the Americans of having
links with Teheran. Apart from its various advantages, Hamid Karzai’s
visit to Teheran has cleared the doubts and suspicions, if any, with
the regime in Teheran. Prime Minister Karzai is now in India at the head of a strong official delegation. This is his first visit to India after assuming the reins of power of the interim government. Soon after the installation of the coalition government in Kabul in December, at least three ministers visited New Delhi in succession. Prior to it, India had also been playing a background role at the Bonn deliberations, which brought the present government in Kabul into existence. Thereafter, General Fahim, the Defence Minister of Afghanistan, who is also the brother of late Ahmad Shah Masud, also visited India. There is regular communication between the two countries on matters of common interests contributing to the securing of peace in the region. With
the beginning of the Soviet incursion into Afghanistan, a situation
developed in that country in which India was sidelined. With the
advent of the Taliban, India’s role came to a total naught, thanks
to the animus working in Indo-Pak relations. Only a year back, General
Musharraf said that India had no role whatsoever to the north of
Pakistan. Indian political commentators and academics specialising in
the geopolitics of the region regularly advised the Government of
India not to be complacent with what was going on in Afghanistan and
the region. India was also warned from time to time that in case the
Taliban succeeded in pulling down the liberal regime in neighbouring
Tajikistan, it would be a great setback to India’s interests in
Central Asia. However, India’s pre-occupation in Kashmir, and the
USA not too realistic an appreciated of the impending threats in the
region proved obstacles in the way of New Delhi to be more active on
the subject. But now there is a sea change in Indo-Afghan relations. The coalition regime has a fund of goodwill for India. It is looking forward to investment by India in Afghanistan in a massive way. It needs Indian expertise in various fields leading to the stabilising of the interim government. Evidently, foundations have to be laid for long-term Indo-Afghan economic and cultural relations. There are several realities of the situation, which India should never lose sight of. The first is that although India has had good relations with the Northern Alliance leadership even during the days of Taliban dominance in Afghanistan, yet the fact of the matter is that the Pushtun ethnic segment of the Afghan population has to be given its due. India cannot afford to displease the Pushtun for historical and practical reasons. The second reality is that there are three million Pushtun refugees in Pakistan. Durand Line or no Durand Line, Pakistan has a strong clout with the Pushtuns. Given the fact that Pakistan has been left with the licking of her wounds in Afghanistan, her intelligence agency will make a strong effort to revive the Pushtun antagonism to the Northern Alliance and if possible to foment anti-government flames in Afghanistan. It is time that New Delhi tries to neutralise this probability by establishing direct contact with the Pushtun leadership in Afghanistan and also among the Pushtun refugees in Pakistan and Iran. The
third reality is that India has no overland route leading to
Afghanistan. As long as Pakistan remains antagonistic, we do not
expect to reach Afghanistan as briskly as we would like. Therefore, it
would require astute diplomatic skill to persuade the international
community to bring pressure on Pakistan to provide exit route to
Indian merchandise to Afghanistan. The USA has to understand that
India can play a major role in transforming the economic condition in
Afghanistan, which is the only key to an effort of stabilising a
moderate government in Kabul and ensuring the development of civil
society in Afghanistan.
|
||
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Editorial | | Business | Sport | World | Mailbag | In Spotlight | Chandigarh Tribune | Ludhiana Tribune 50 years of Independence | Tercentenary Celebrations | | 122 Years of Trust | Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail | |