|
With this incident in background, one has to say that, unless the both
the famous museums ensure that the most modern surveillance equipment is
installed in the vaults, where the Nizam’s Jewels are to be displayed
(including the Jacob Diamond priced at 432 crore of rupees) the
treasures are in grave danger of being taken away by international
thieves, who will find ready buyers for these centuries-old Mughal
treasures in the West or the Sheikhdoms of the Middle East. Anybody who
would have seen the famous cinema Topkapi, which
showed-technically-how a famous diamond can be stolen out of the one of
the world famous museums, would know that our museum security systems
are no match for the international hoodlums.
In the 1950s, a
complete ceiling panel fresco was cut out of the famous Bagh cave
murals, as if slicing away a piece of cake, with such sophisticated
modern equipment, that none of the nearby frescos were damaged. Only the
fresco "ordered" by the foreign masters was removed by the
"looters" and taken away. An enquiry showed that even the
Archaelogical Survey of India did not have such a modern gadget.
Only in Moscow of the
1970s, where I had gone to have a look at the Diamond Reserve of the
Soviets, in the treasure vaults of the Kremlin have I seen a security
system that might, with the latest improvements in modern
science-computer operated technology, enable India to care of the Nizam’s
Jewels. The Diamond Reserves of the Soviets, consisting of fabulous
Russian national heirlooms and caskets holding hundreds of kilos of
diamonds/rubies/emeralds was displayed in a hall which was a steel-lined
safety vault in itself. Nothing was allowed inside the vault other than
the dress you are wearing and even that was checked with metal
detectors.
All the paraphernalia
of the tourists, including ladies handbags/cameras had to be deposited
in a security checkpost far away from the Diamond Reserves and you were
accompanied into the vault by as many security guards as there were
visitors. Once your group went into the vault, it was locked from
outside as if you were inside a Godrej safe 100 feet by 100 feet. As I
accompanied the English-speaking Russian guide explaining the history of
the treasures, she paused in front of one huge diamond, embellished with
carvings. "This is the famous Shah diamond "she said, "
This is an Indian treasure that was taken out of Delhi by the Persian
Emperor Nadir Shah in 1739 and presented by a later Persian monarch to
the Czar of Russia, as an apology for the murder of a Russian Ambassador
in Teheran". As she said these words, I went near the "bomb
proof/bullet proof" heavy glass guarding the display case to have a
look at the diamond stolen from India. Meanwhile the tourist group had
moved away to other exhibits. As I gazed intently at the diamond,
suddenly I was aware that I had been surrounded by three of the security
guards (although those were the days of cordial Indo-Soviet relations).
Only when I moved away from the showcase and joined the tourist group
did the guards leave me. In the 1960s, Raj Kapoor, the most popular of
our film stars was visiting the Tower of London, where the fabulous Koh-i-noor
diamond is kept.
Accompanying him was
the diminutive comedy actor Mukri. Raj Kapoor wanted to play a practical
joke on Mukri. He went quietly to the security guard in the display room
and whispered to him that Mukhri was an Indian terrorist, dedicated to
take away the Koh-i-noor for India-its original homeland. In a
second, Mukhri found himself surrounded by heavily-armed guards and no
amount to apology/explanations from Raj Kapoor that he was joking could
rescue the victim. Mukri was taken to the high security prison and only
after the High Commissioner for India to United Kingdom, prodded by Raj
Kapoor stood guarantee for Mukri he was released.
I was in the Gulestan
Palace Museum of Teheran in the 1970s having a look at the Nadiri
Peacock Throne and other Iranian treasures displayed there. Suddenly the
sirens began to wail and all the doors of the treasure chamber came down
with a rapid action, imprisoning the sightseers in the treasure room.
Reason?... One of the tourists had gone too near the bombproof/bullet
glass protecting the treasure display cases...It had set off an alarm.
The sightseers were marshalled out of the vault by the security police
and those who pleaded that they had not seen all the treasures, were
allowed back after a careful search even of their "g arments",
and had to reenter bracketed with two heavily armed guards. Most of the
tourists decided to opt out of the second visit.
These were the sort of "Treasure
guarding" in foreign countries in vogue 30 years ago. The computer
security systems much be more alert and sophisticated now... As such
unless the National Museum and the Salar Jung Museum invests in such
"state of the art"precautions, we will find that what happened
to a greater treasure (Mahatma Gandhi’s spectacles) will happen to the
Nizam’s jewels also. The authorities of the Gandhi Memorial at Delhi,
found that some visitor in the early 1950’s had walked away with the
original spectacles of the Mahatma, displayed along with the blood
stained clothes, worn by him when he was assassinated. The scared
"security" staff went to the Juma Masjid area, bought a cheap
pair of spectacles and kept it near the clothes! Only decades later the
nation knew of the fraud. — MF
|